Author Topic: Firearms  (Read 2501 times)

guest5

  • Guest
Re: Firearms
« Reply #30 on: February 15, 2021, 01:54:25 pm »
Child kills suspect after 73-year-old Goldsboro woman shot during robbery
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8abGQHCMi7w

Shouldn't be too surprising, children are often the most heroic among us.

guest5

  • Guest
Re: Firearms
« Reply #31 on: March 11, 2021, 09:16:11 pm »
Why Gun Reform is No Longer the 'Third Rail' of U.S. Politics
Quote
Moms Demand Action Co-Founder Shannon Watts joins Mehdi Hasan to discuss two new popular bill expanding background checks for gun sales that just passed the House, and the future of the legislation in the Senate.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Je5qA69ADso

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7321
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Firearms
« Reply #32 on: March 16, 2021, 11:44:55 pm »
RIP Nika Nicole Holbert:

Quote
field training officer Josh Baker from the East Precinct, was patrolling in the area of Brick Church Pike near the intersection of Ewing Drive when he spotted a black 2015 Chevrolet Camaro. Officer Baker was aware that the registered owner of the Camaro, convicted felon Demond Buchanan, had six outstanding drug warrants, charging five felonies and one misdemeanor, that were issued last month for possession of heroin, ****, methamphetamine, ecstasy, Xanax and crack ****. Officer Baker radioed to check on the airborne status of a police helicopter, believing that the driver of the Camaro might try to flee. The camaro stopped in the parking lot of the Dollar General store. Officer Baker found that it was being driven not by the wanted drug felon, but by Nika Nicole Holbert.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zFrF8PCR08

Finally another American who understands what the Second Amendment is for! Unfortunately, she panicked in the heat of the moment, which sharply lowered her combat effectiveness. Her first mistake was to let Baker see her draw her firearm (3:50), leading to him shooting her at the same time as she shot him. If you are going to keep a firearm in your car, keep it in a bag (so that it cannot be seen, but you can still shoot through the bag). But even then she could have salvaged the situation. Rather than flee in her car (4:14), she should instead have used the car to run him over, and then empty her remaining ammo into his head! She was dying anyway by that point; what did she have to lose?! This is what I keep saying about militarism as opposed to survivalism: the moment combat begins, you stop caring about your own life and focus on ending the life of your oppressor at any cost, so that even if you die too, at least you have accounted for yourself demographically. But she tried to save her own life, and the result was that she still died:

Quote
She died later Friday morning at a local hospital.

while her oppressor survived:

Quote
Officer Baker is in stable condition after undergoing surgery.

With that said, Holbert is still far more respectable than any of the countless victims who let the racist police slaughter them in total passivity. At least she can say she tried to fight, even if she lacked the skill to fight well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9pc5AkUVIE

This is the piece of **** who should have died but did not:




« Last Edit: March 16, 2021, 11:54:21 pm by 90sRetroFan »

guest5

  • Guest
Re: Firearms
« Reply #33 on: March 17, 2021, 11:00:15 pm »
With this device you could technically have the firearm in the firing position and pointing at the door (if you attached it to the door), this way all one need do is squeeze the trigger and fire through the door. A Desert Eagle would do the trick for sure.

https://www.amazon.com/Magnetic-Mount-Holster-Vehicle-Home/dp/B01LXCJHKG


rp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1088
    • View Profile
Re: Firearms
« Reply #34 on: March 23, 2021, 12:38:56 pm »
Boulder martyr on christian mohammedan solidarity:
« Last Edit: May 31, 2021, 12:43:07 am by rp »

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7321
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Firearms
« Reply #35 on: March 23, 2021, 10:42:02 pm »


Yes, he is. So why didn't you shoot 10 Trump family members (excluding Mary) instead of 10 random people? (If it is later revealed that the 10 people you shot were all Trump supporters, then fair enough, but still, why not go for the Trumps (excluding Mary) themselves given that you will only have one chance?)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kdfqvg1wFfM
« Last Edit: March 24, 2021, 02:49:59 am by 90sRetroFan »

rp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1088
    • View Profile
Re: Firearms
« Reply #36 on: April 18, 2021, 04:36:22 am »

rp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1088
    • View Profile
Re: Firearms
« Reply #37 on: April 20, 2021, 12:50:00 am »
Zaid Hamid (ex-Mujahideen) on firearms:
https://youtu.be/ipKERvXcVug

More on Hamid:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zaid_Hamid#Political_views
Quote
Hamid claims that the November 2008 Mumbai attacks, were part of a plan hatched by "Hindu Zionists", and that it was an attempt by the Indians to stage a false flag attack, which he accuses the September 11th Attacks of being.[5][8]

Hamid believes that Muhammad had declared war on India, and claims that India will be "trounced and enslaved according to sharia if Hindus donít repent and embrace Islam."[9]

The moment I saw Hamid was an ex-Mujahid on his Twitter bio, I knew he would have invaluable firearms expertise. One thing I like about Mujahids is their militaristic attitude toward combat, which distinguishes them from Westerners. It is something you can just "feel" just by watching the video; his determination to defeat the enemy at all costs, even his own life. I believe all non-Westerners should learn this style of combat, as it demonstrates the frame of mind they should have if they want to defeat Westerners: you should fight not because you want to, but because you have to. The only thing I worry about is that Hamid's anti-Indian views may be off-putting to them.

Also his dietary prescriptions:
https://twitter.com/ZaidZamanHamid/status/1357999002885754883?s=20

While I have heard some say that it is necessary for warriors to adopt a non-vegan diet in order to foster the frame of mind needed for combat, I do not agree with this. How can vegan non-Westerners feel confident in being a vegan warrior when they see even other non-Westerners trashing the diet? What is your take on this?

This is why I feel it is important to distinguish between False Leftist (pacifist) vegans and True Leftist (militarist) vegans.
« Last Edit: April 24, 2021, 01:44:08 am by rp »

rp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1088
    • View Profile
Re: Firearms
« Reply #38 on: April 22, 2021, 01:53:41 am »
The guy I was talking about recruiting:
https://twitter.com/taiyogakure/status/1382925672603996162?s=20
Quote
Itís truly embarrassing that it is 2021 and no one has heroically put a bullet into this racist subhumanís skull yet
« Last Edit: May 22, 2021, 03:44:57 am by rp »

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7321
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Firearms
« Reply #39 on: April 24, 2021, 01:26:52 am »
"How can non-Westerners feel confident in being a non-vegan warrior when they see even other non-Westerners trashing the diet? What is your take on this?"

Is there a typo here?





rp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1088
    • View Profile
Re: Firearms
« Reply #40 on: April 24, 2021, 01:44:49 am »
I changed it. Here is the new sentence:
"While I have heard some say that it is necessary for warriors to adopt a non-vegan diet in order to foster the frame of mind needed for combat, I do not agree with this. How can vegan non-Westerners feel confident in being a vegan warrior when they see even other non-Westerners trashing the diet? What is your take on this?"
« Last Edit: April 24, 2021, 03:01:32 am by rp »

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7321
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Firearms
« Reply #41 on: April 24, 2021, 03:27:45 am »
"How can vegan non-Westerners feel confident in being a vegan warrior when they see even other non-Westerners trashing the diet? What is your take on this?"

Those who feel they must eat animal products in order to be ready to fight are reflecting only who they are racially. Even if it is true that those people are incapable of combat unless they eat animal products, it does not imply that we would also be incapable of combat unless we eat animal products. We and they are different, hence with different dietary requirements for optimizing performance, whether in combat or any other field. If we should lack confidence in our diets because people like them exist, then by the same logic they should also lack confidence in their diets because people like us exist! But they don't. So why should we?

(Of course, the ethical duty is on them to find a way to be adequately combat-ready without animal products.)


rp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1088
    • View Profile
Re: Firearms
« Reply #42 on: April 24, 2021, 03:40:26 am »
"If we should lack confidence in our diets because people like them exist, then by the same logic they should also lack confidence in their diets because people like us exist!"

I guess the point I am trying to get it at is that people lack confidence in fighting because of our diets. For example, those who consume animal products clearly have an advantage due to their higher aggression. And history reflects this, as non-Aryans almost always end up defeating Aryans. This is why I believe in creating combat methods separate for Aryans.*

*Perhaps this could account for why in NS Germany the Aryan SS was kept separate from the Wehrmacht, the latter of which mostly had non-Aryans in its ranks?


90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7321
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Firearms
« Reply #43 on: April 24, 2021, 04:15:49 am »
"those who consume animal products clearly have an advantage due to their higher aggression."

Are you saying the animal products chemically causes aggression in anyone who consumes them, or are you saying that those who are inclined to consume animal products are more aggressive anyway?

In any case, aggressiveness can be advantageous or disadvantageous depending on circumstances.

"And history reflects this, as non-Aryans almost always end up defeating Aryans."

I am not sure which examples you are thinking of. Aryan diffusion involved us defeating Gentiles many times. The main historical Turanian advantage over us is ergonomic: their food being able to walk with them while we had to carry our food! This allowed them to retreat back to the steppe whenever they needed to, and if we tried to pursue them, we would always run out of food first.

rp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1088
    • View Profile
Re: Firearms
« Reply #44 on: April 24, 2021, 04:26:32 am »
"Are you saying the animal products chemically causes aggression in anyone who consumes them, or are you saying that those who are inclined to consume animal products are more aggressive anyway?"

The former. But regarding the latter, I believe that Aryans who would be so appalled at animal slaughter might think that non-Aryans can defeat them because they possess more lightning than Aryans, i.e. the non-Aryans can bring themselves to kill humans because they have no compunction in killing innocent animals, but Aryans cannot bring themselves to kill humans since they do have such compunction.


"I am not sure which examples you are thinking of. Aryan diffusion involved us defeating Gentiles many times. The main historical Turanian advantage over us is ergonomic: their food being able to walk with them while we had to carry our food! This allowed them to retreat back to the steppe whenever they needed to, and if we tried to pursue them, we would always run out of food first."

Ok. I thought it was because of aggression, but now I see that this is not the case.
« Last Edit: April 24, 2021, 04:33:58 am by rp »