The first thing we must never do is let an interviewer get away with portraying hostility towards Jews as "racism". The moment they make such a claim, even before getting onto the content of whatever we have said, we must first falsify their claim by explaining that hostility towards Jews is anti-racism. In Wiley's case, since he previously compared Jews to the KKK, he could have simply asked the interviewer:
1) Would it make sense to call hostility towards the KKK "racism"?
2) If not, then how does it make sense to call hostility towards Jews "racism"?
This then demands the discussion at least confront the actual teachings of Judaism (if only for comparison with KKK teachings) in order to continue meaningfully, which is how we want to steer all such discussions.
By the way:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_Klux_Klan#HistoryThe Klan used public violence against black people and their allies as intimidation. They burned houses and attacked and killed black people, leaving their bodies on the roads.[58] While racism was a core belief of the Klan, anti-Semitism was not. Many prominent southern Jews identified wholly with southern culture, resulting in examples of Jewish participation in the Klan.[59]