Author Topic: JEWS HAVE NOTHING IN COMMON WITH US!  (Read 16794 times)

antihellenistic

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 643
    • View Profile
Liberalism Resulting Western System of Economic Terror
« Reply #360 on: September 24, 2022, 02:26:14 am »
Many so-called "progressive" people see "the less progressives" like the "African" and "South East Asian" people are "bad". But they are worse through imitating western economic system which oppressing the society through debt and usury. And forcing other people to be productive at work in order to succeed at pay the endless debt which using usury...

Who are introduce the debt-based economic system? The answer is the "White Europeans" who are created Western Civilization.

And the main figure was Alexander Hamilton who introduce the debt-based economic system to the United States which emulate the British liberal economic system. See his written proposal to the "United States"'s constitution which available online below :

Soure : https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Hamilton/01-07-02-0229-0003

Quote
"Purchases and undertakings, in general, can be carried on by any given sum of bank paper or credit, as effectually as by an equal sum of gold and silver. And thus by contributing to enlarge the mass of industrious and commercial enterprise, banks become nurseries of national wealth: a consequence, as satisfactorily verified by experience, as it is clearly deducible in theory.

...

It is a truth, which ought not to be denied, that the method of conducting business, which is essential to bank operations, has among us, in particular instances, given occasion to usurious transactions. The punctuality, in payments, which they necessarily exact has sometimes obliged those, who have adventured beyond both their capital and their credit to procure money, at any price, and consequently to resort to usurers for aid.

...

The emitting of paper money by the authority of Government is wisely prohibited to the individual States, by the National Constitution. And the spirit of that prohibition ought not to be disregarded, by the Government of the United States. ... that the wisdom of the Government will be shewn in never trusting itself with the use of so seducing and dangerous an expedient.

The debt composing part of the capital, besides its collateral effect in enabling the Bank to extend its operations, and consequently to enlarge its profits, will produce a direct annual revenue of six per centum from the Government, which will enter into the half yearly dividends received by the Stockholders.

...

The last thing, which will require any explanatory remark, is the authority proposed to be given to the President to subscribe to the amount of two millions of Dollars on account of the public. The main design of this is to enlarge the specie fund of the Bank, and to enable it to give a more early extension to its operations. Though it is proposed to borrow with one hand what is lent with the other, yet the disbursement of what is borrowed will be progressive, and Bank notes may be thrown into circulation, instead of the gold and silver. Besides, there is to be an annual reimbursement of a part of the sum borrowed, which will finally operate as an actual investment of so much specie. In addition to the inducements to this measure, which results from the general interest of the Government, to enlarge the sphere of the utility of the Bank, there is this more particular consideration, to wit, that as far as the dividend on the Stock shall exceed the interest paid on the loan, there is a positive profit.

Explanation :

The western way of economy are not trust the government to handle the national's economy. Then they make a proposal to make the financial institution to be owned by the individual corruptor masquerade as "economic expert". Therefore the national economy are owned not by the state, but by individual who tend to oppress the state and their citizens with the usury economic system. And if the proposals are accepted by the government, then the government will force their people to be productive endlessly. The result is endless revenue and oppressive actions to the another nations with colonialism idea with pretext of "need another sources of income" in order to pay the debt and people's needs. Actually, people's needs are people's mortgage. But the Western nations are not feel that's a problem, because they can be a productive people with their ability to keep pay that usury. Seeing their productivity still benefitting them even though through exploit and colonize another communities.

And there's some people on "United States"'s constitution during that time who are tried to against Alexander Hamilton. But Alexander Hamilton's proposal was strong enough maybe, so even George Washington eventually signed that proposals and make that western economic system to be implemented on the state. See this information below :

Source : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Bank_of_the_United_States

Quote
Hamilton's bank proposal faced widespread resistance from opponents of increased federal power. Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson and James Madison led the opposition, which claimed that the bank was unconstitutional, and that it benefited merchants and investors at the expense of the majority of the population.

Like most of the Southern members of Congress,[13] Jefferson and Madison also opposed a second of the three proposals of Hamilton: establishing an official government Mint. They believed this centralization of power away from local banks was dangerous to a sound monetary system and was mostly to the benefit of business interests in the commercial north, not southern agricultural interests, arguing that the right to own property would be infringed by these proposals. Furthermore, they contended that the creation of such a bank violated the Constitution, which specifically stated that Congress was to regulate weights and measures and issue coined money (rather than mint and bills of credit).[14]

...

On February 25, 1791, convinced that the constitution authorized the measure,[16] Washington signed the "bank bill" into law.

And there's some wealthy individual who also signed the bank's bill to agree with that system too.



Bank of the United States check signed by John Jacob Astor in 1792

Source : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Bank_of_the_United_States#/media/File:ASTOR,_John_Jacob_(signed_check).jpg

Who are John Jacob Astor? See this information below :

Quote
John Jacob Astor (1763-1884). John Jacob Astor was born in Waldorf, Duchy of Baden (Germany) from a Jewish bloodline.

...

Astor became a banker, and sat on the board of 5 directors of the new national bank that Hamilton created for the U.S. government called the Bank of the United States. Astor owned a large block of the stock of the Bank of the United States. Astor also was fairly active during his life as a Freemason, holding several more key positions in the secret lodge life.

...

...“John Jacob Astor made a huge fortune out of the China opium trade .... it was the Committee of 300 who chose who would be allowed to participate in the fabulously lucrative China opium trade, through its monopolistic BEIC, and the beneficiaries of their largess remained forever wedded to the Committee of 300.”

Source : https://www.ganino.com/books/the_astor_bloodline

Another information about Alexander Hamilton. See this information below:

Quote
"The United States debt, foreign and domestic, was the price of liberty. ... to establish public order on the basis of an upright and liberal policy; these are the great and invaluable ends to be secured by a proper and adequate provision, at the present period, for the support of public credit."

..

An admirer of British political systems

...


"A national debt, if it is not excessive," Hamilton argued, "will be to us a national blessing."

Source : https://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/histdebt/histdebt.htm

Therefore liberalism ideology was sources of western colonialism and economic terror too beside the Judaic-Christian teachings which influence it. Because liberalism promoting separation of power from the national leader which make easy for the oppressive individuals to control some part of national constitution and make anything to influence the national's policy into benefit them and oppress anothers.
« Last Edit: September 24, 2022, 02:31:41 am by antihellenistic »