Guess who's back?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/racist-penn-law-prof-makes-220129764.html‘Racist’ Penn Law Prof Makes Disturbing Claim U.S. Is ‘Better Off With Fewer Asians’
A controversial law professor at the University of Pennsylvania is taking heat—yet again—for her racist comments.
This time, Amy Wax was called out for being xenophobic in a recent interview with Glenn Loury, a social sciences professor at Brown University, and was quick to clap back at her critics. But her “defense” only made things worse, when she directly stated that because “most” Asian Americans support Democrats, “the United States is better off with fewer Asians and less Asian immigration.”
The social media backlash was swift, with former President Donald Trump’s niece Mary Trump even chiming in.
“It helps explain the situation this country finds itself in that an Ivy League university allows the morally and intellectually bankrupt racist #AmyWax teach the next generation of American lawyers. There should be consequences for this kind of hateful rhetoric @pennlaw,” she wrote.
...
“In the case of Asians in the U.S., the overwhelming majority vote Democratic,” Wax argued. “I find Asian support for these policies mystifying, as I fail to see how they are in Asians’ interest. We can speculate (and, yes, generalize) about Asians’ desire to please the elite.”
Or we could speculate about wanting to support policies that are fairer, something which is obviously alien to Wax. (In any case, are Blue policies more favourable to the elite than Red policies in the first place?)
About Wax:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_WaxWax was born and raised with her two sisters in a Jewish household in Troy, New York, where she attended public schools.[2][3][4] Her parents were immigrants from Eastern Europe.[4]
...
In an August 2017 piece in The Philadelphia Inquirer titled "Paying the price for breakdown of the country's bourgeois culture", she wrote with San Diego law professor Larry Alexander that since the 1950s, the decline of "bourgeois values" (such as hard work, self-discipline, marriage, and respect for authority) had contributed to social ills such as male labor force participation rates down to Great Depression-era levels, endemic opioid abuse, half of all children being born to single mothers, and many college students lacking basic skills. The authors asserted that "all cultures are not equal. Or at least they are not equal in preparing people to be productive in an advanced economy."[11][13] She told The Daily Pennsylvanian that "everyone wants to go to countries ruled by white Europeans" because of their "superior" mores.
...
In July 2019, at the Edmund Burke Foundation's inaugural National Conservatism conference, Wax said, "Embracing... cultural distance nationalism, means in effect taking the position that our country will be better off with more whites and fewer non-whites."[18]
...
In 2021, Wax wrote that "the United States is better off with fewer Asians," claiming Asians vote disproportionately for the "pernicious" Democratic Party, which she called "mystifying" because the Democratic Party "demands equal outcomes despite clear . . . group differences" and "valorizes blacks." She favorably cited Enoch Powell while calling for stricter race-based immigration restrictions against Asians.[20]
There are no "Asians" or "blacks". There are only "non-whites" ie. historical victims of Western colonialism. Wax does not understand this because Jews were never victims of Western colonialism (and in fact were among the Western colonialists - the ones who invented the notions of "Asian" and "black" and imposed them on their victims without their own consent).