First article:
We need to use another economic system, which makes people’s lives better and freer from unnecessary debts from the “modern” Western economic system, for example, an economic system where money is printed or made according to the amount of gold a government or state has
We are opposed to metal-backed money. A national currency backed by gold will have its value subject to alteration by the quantity of gold available in
other countries, thus is not independent. The only way for a national currency to be independent is for it to be backed by national labour.
Second article:
If Western colonialism is beneficial for the colonized people, then in the historical recording of colonialism there will not be an event of rebellion carried out by those who colonized
This would imply that no rebels in history were ever misled. Are you sure about this?? I suggest you come up with a better argument about why Western colonialism is bad that does not depend on whether or not rebellion occurred. (In many Western colonies there were no rebellions; that does not imply colonialism was good in those places.)
when they were colonized by white people
Missing "" around "white".