True Left

" "

@gloom

“However, on the same website we read:”

On Wikipedia it also says the ‘Holocaust’ happened. Does this imply that every piece of information on Wikipedia is false?

As a matter of fact, there are also records of Siddhartha eating meat; he advocated freeganism among his original sangha:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freeganism

Nevertheless this has not prevented Buddhism from increasingly aligning with veganism after Buddhism became established within the economy (freeganism only works economically when the rest of society is non-freegan, whereas veganism can work economically for an entire society, therefore veganism is not a deviation from Buddhism, but the correct application of Buddhist ethics in conjunction with the instruction to spread Buddhism). This is the path that we are in the process of encouraging Mohammedanism to take also. We treat the article you linked to with the same contempt that we treat articles that argue that Siddhartha’s meat-eating makes meat-eating in general acceptable for Buddhists.

On our own main site we explicitly include the quote:

“An extended chapter of our talk was devoted by the Fuehrer to the vegetarian question. He believes more than ever that meat eating is wrong. Of course he knows that during the war we cannot completely upset our food system. After the war, however, he intends to tackle this problem also.” – Joseph Goebbels

http://aryanism.net/culture/veganism/

Like Hitler, Mohammed was preparing for and then fighting a war until the end of his life, therefore the same practical considerations would have applied. War is hell. This does not mean that veganism should not be rigorously pursued as soon as this can be done without jeopardizing strategic objectives.

Besides, I suggest taking the Bukhari hadiths with a grain of salt:

The Shi’a consider many Sunni transmitters of hadith to be unreliable because many of them took the side of Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthman in preference to Ali (and the rest of Prophet Muhammad’s family) and the majority of them were narrated through certain personalities that waged war against Ahlul Bayt or sided with their enemies such as Aisha that fought Ali at Jamal, or Muawiya who did so at Tiffin.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Four_Books

The sooner we end Islamophobia as a whole, the sooner we can start selectively criticizing corruptions existing within present-day and historical Islam, such as:

“Eid-ul-Adha”

It honors the willingness of Ibrahim (Abraham) to sacrifice his son

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eid_al-Adha

We of all people can be trusted to de-Judaize Islam, as we have repeatedly promised to do. If you truly cared about animal welfare, you would be helping us instead of attacking us.

“here we can gaze at the promotion of veganism/aryan values at the Nuremberg rally”

“I know that somebody must come forth to meet our situation. I have sought him. I have found him nowhere. And therefore I have taken upon myself to do the preparatory work, only the most urgent preparatory work. For that much I know: I am not He. And I know also what is lacking in me.” – Adolf Hitler

Thank you for demonstrating who is trying to build on National Socialist Germany by championing its ideals and who is trying to drag it down by zooming in on its imperfections.

I agree that it is impractical to overhaul the food system without winning the war first. But shouldn't the leaders at least possess the ethical judgement to individually avoid meat themselves? Or are you saying that meat obtained through freeganism is more ethical than vegan food obtained through a food system that will end up benefiting the meat-eaters and other violence doers indirectly (economically or otherwise)?

If the latter, I kind of do agree with you. Pacifist Jains, for example, who refrain from wearing silk but end up working at silk textile factories indirectly perpetuate violence as their labor benefits the violence doers. The same could be said of pacifist False Leftist "White" vegans (to say nothing of "Jewish Vegans").*

But since I would assume this only applies to freegans, are you saying that Siddhartha and Mohammed were both freegans, as opposed to being regular meat eaters? I would object to following a regular meat-eater as a "religious" leader, whatever the case is.

*Although the last two are oxymoronic, and therefore not even vegan