True Left

"Both face shapes are terrible. I'm not sure what you are trying to get at."
Gukesh's face is a little narrower, eye sockets shallower...


"which is millennia after the Vedic invasion, therefore I am not sure how we can credibly claim it is Aryan. Unless you have information indicating that it already existed during Indus Valley civilization?"
We at least have this much:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Damnthatsinteresting/comments/zqw9wh/this_ancient_chess_board_was_excavated_from/?rdt=38408

"Also, how according to your theory do you explain the the overtly Turanian pieces?"
Perhaps it was a later addition, and the pieces were not named as such before?

"I personally have never enjoyed chess anywhere near as much as I have enjoyed dice-based board games.  "
I liked the mental challenge that came with chess, but soon I found that winning it was basically psychological manipulation. But part of me wants to think it isn't necessarily this way? Anyway, in the short term I support "non Whites" reclaiming it (and restoring its non Western origins) from "Whites" (including Jews).

"We at least have this much:"

This could be more like checkers, which is known to be much older than chess:

A board resembling a checkers board was found in Ur dating from 3000 BC.[4] In the British Museum are specimens of ancient Egyptian checkerboards, found with their pieces in burial chambers, and the game was played by the pharaoh Hatshepsut.[2][5] Plato mentioned a game, πεττεία or petteia, as being of Egyptian origin,[5] and Homer also mentions it.[5] The method of capture was placing two pieces on either side of the opponent's piece. It was said to have been played during the Trojan War.[6][7]

so, as you suggested, Turanians probably came across checkers, decided it was not complicated enough, and modified it into chess.

"Racists will say the "blacks" are inferior they're more mature (like here), but then they would also say "blacks" are inferior because they're less mature."

To be fair, what our enemies mean is that "black" children reach puberty at an earlier age on average:



but "black" adults have lower sexual dimorphism than "white" adults (due to the latter having a heavier puberty) on average:



In short, our enemies think that "blacks" are inferior because "black" children aren't really children and "black" adults aren't really adults, just like they think "blacks" are inferior because "black" women aren't really women and "black" men aren't really men. We could say that Western civilization, in addition to valuing high sexual dimorphism, also values high pre/post-pubescent dimorphism. This is consistent with Westerners being not only homophobic and transphobic, but also MAP-phobic.

We also see this in how, at the same time as Western civilization is praised by our enemies for having fiction with the most adult themes:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/sexual-dimorphism-preferences/msg16234/#msg16234

it is also only Western civilization has an explicit category of fiction called "children's fiction". In every other civilization prior to the colonial era, it was considered normal for children and adults to consume the same fiction.

Even the stupidity known as:



was a Western idea:

The British Board of Film Classification (BBFC)[3] is a non-governmental organisation founded by the British film industry in 1912

Ultimately, Western civilization is the most age-segregationist civilization. (Compulsory schooling for children is the most cruel manifestation of this.)