Home
Search
Login
RegisterPosted by: HikariDude
« on: July 15, 2023, 12:26:23 pm »Next time, I probably should say that I do not intend to continue if I was that nervous.
Posted by: HikariDude
« on: July 15, 2023, 12:21:02 pm »Maybe to be frank, I do not have anything to reply about. I was also nervous and I think it was appropriate to leave it there.
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: July 15, 2023, 12:33:10 am »"I do."
I can't hold up the topic indefinitely just waiting for you to reply. I am moving ahead.
I can't hold up the topic indefinitely just waiting for you to reply. I am moving ahead.
Posted by: HikariDude
« on: June 24, 2023, 09:58:52 am »I do. I am just a little nervous because we have different tastes in music.
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: June 23, 2023, 10:46:41 pm »By the way, do you intend to continue the conversation here:
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/counterculture-era/recommended-music-to-listen-to/
in the near future? I was ready to post many more songs but you suddenly stopped replying.
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/counterculture-era/recommended-music-to-listen-to/
in the near future? I was ready to post many more songs but you suddenly stopped replying.
Posted by: HikariDude
« on: June 23, 2023, 10:39:58 pm »Thank you for making that clear.
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: June 23, 2023, 10:32:42 pm »Quote
A National Socialist state would outlaw all cosmetic surgery except for facial reconstruction following disfiguring accidents, and even in such cases surgery should only attempt to restore the pre-accident appearance rather than opportunistically alter it.
This refers to facial surgery. "Cosmetic" implies that its effects can be seen in public.
"Did you write that? How would you explain at this time and era?"
Yes, I wrote that and stand by it.
"wouldn't you think 'sex reassignment' surgeries contradicts a little with a movement that encourages people to be honest about physical appearance?"
No, because genitals are typically not visible in public. Also from the main site:
Quote
there need be no explicit sociological category referring to people who have undergone gender reassignment operations. We do not refer to cleft palate surgery outpatients as a special subgroup of society known as “transcraniofacials”,nor for that matter do we refer to people who do not require cleft palate surgery as “ciscraniofacials”, so why refer to genital surgery outpatients as a special subgroup of society known as “transgenders”, and the rest as “cisgenders”?
This suffices to imply that it was never our intention to outlaw genital surgery.
See also:
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/ancient-world/roman-road-construction/msg17886/#msg17886
Posted by: HikariDude
« on: June 23, 2023, 09:03:27 pm »I remember I saw a paragraph from the main page:
As much as I am against the concept of gender based standards, wouldn't you think 'sex reassignment' surgeries contradicts a little with a movement that encourages people to be honest about physical appearance?
Did you write that? How would you explain at this time and era?
Edit: If this should, would you like to put this post in:
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/questions-debates/
?
Quote
Whether or not we are personally lucky enough (and most of us are not) to possess the Aryan phenotype, we should present ourselves in daily life as though we do possess it. By this we mean that we should be wholly honest about our physical appearance and not try to enhance it through artificial means. Cosmetic products or cosmetic surgery must be understood as aesthetic deception and therefore unethical to all onlookers (in addition to being economically wasteful). A National Socialist state would outlaw all cosmetic surgery except for facial reconstruction following disfiguring accidents, and even in such cases surgery should only attempt to restore the pre-accident appearance rather than opportunistically alter it. By similar reasoning, makeup would be available only to actors who need greasepaint to look on stage/screen how they ordinarily look without makeup. The truth is that contrast-increasing makeup (e.g. eye shadow, lipstick, rouge, etc.) only improves the non-Aryan face; the Aryan face is so well-proportioned that increased contrast only makes it look worse.
As much as I am against the concept of gender based standards, wouldn't you think 'sex reassignment' surgeries contradicts a little with a movement that encourages people to be honest about physical appearance?
Did you write that? How would you explain at this time and era?
Edit: If this should, would you like to put this post in:
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/questions-debates/
?
Posted by: Vrilya
« on: June 23, 2023, 07:38:33 pm »mhm
Posted by: 2ThaSun
« on: June 20, 2023, 07:05:12 pm »
Posted by: Vrilya
« on: June 20, 2023, 06:32:54 am »>Giving a child candy without the child being aware that the candy comes with strings attached is deception.
What if there isn't any? According to you guys, that would make it okay.
>What you fail to understand is the fact that after a successful Aryanization process has taken place, the adulterated will no-longer exist. Which also means human-beings will have gone extinct...
But has it? NOPE. Excellent plan retard.
What if there isn't any? According to you guys, that would make it okay.
>What you fail to understand is the fact that after a successful Aryanization process has taken place, the adulterated will no-longer exist. Which also means human-beings will have gone extinct...
But has it? NOPE. Excellent plan retard.
Posted by: HikariDude
« on: June 18, 2023, 09:06:54 pm »What I see between 'age of consent' laws and 'sovereign citizens' is that both concepts are tribalistic. The former concept is when someone who is at least a minimum age can 'give consent' but others cannot. Similarly for the latter concept, a 'sovereign citizen' can break the rules while others cannot. The guideline I remember is that rules should apply to everyone, so I hope now I see the correlation.
"We want the rules changed, not the rules to remain but some people to think the rules do not apply to themselves."
As long as the rules apply to everyone. On the other hand, even if they change, it is possible that there will be 'sovereign citizens' that will break the changed rule too. That is unless the law tries to favor the 'sovereign citizens'.
"We want the rules changed, not the rules to remain but some people to think the rules do not apply to themselves."
As long as the rules apply to everyone. On the other hand, even if they change, it is possible that there will be 'sovereign citizens' that will break the changed rule too. That is unless the law tries to favor the 'sovereign citizens'.
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: June 18, 2023, 08:33:27 pm »"Do you not count age of consent laws as rules?"
"So is there a consistency between those?"
We want the rules changed, not the rules to remain but some people to think the rules do not apply to themselves. Similarly, we want to end elections, but we also want Trump held accountable for the Red coup:
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/news/red-coup/msg3147/#msg3147
"So is there a consistency between those?"
We want the rules changed, not the rules to remain but some people to think the rules do not apply to themselves. Similarly, we want to end elections, but we also want Trump held accountable for the Red coup:
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/news/red-coup/msg3147/#msg3147
Quote
If we have three countries A, B and C whose people have the characteristics:
A: agree to not have elections
B: agree to have elections and then respect the election results
C: agree to have elections but then do not respect the election results
it is perfectly possible to consider B (which displays commitment to keeping contract) superior to C (which fails to keep contract) without considering B superior to A (which does not fail to keep contract, but merely has better contractual content). So here is how the split works:
False Left worldview: B > C > A
True Left worldview: A > B > C
Posted by: 2ThaSun
« on: June 18, 2023, 08:06:52 pm »"Giving a little kid candy for a good time is "consent", but it will still cause scars that will last a life time."
Giving a child candy without the child being aware that the candy comes with strings attached is deception.
"You clearly have never personally known anyone who has fallen to pedophilia if you think "consent" makes any of those perversions okay."
If deception in any form is involved how could it be deemed consent?
"Seriously, for people daring to call themselves fúcking ARYANISTS who supposedly hold COMPASSION at the center of their worldview"
What you fail to understand is the fact that after a successful Aryanization process has taken place, the adulterated will no-longer exist. Which also means human-beings will have gone extinct...
Giving a child candy without the child being aware that the candy comes with strings attached is deception.
"You clearly have never personally known anyone who has fallen to pedophilia if you think "consent" makes any of those perversions okay."
If deception in any form is involved how could it be deemed consent?
"Seriously, for people daring to call themselves fúcking ARYANISTS who supposedly hold COMPASSION at the center of their worldview"
What you fail to understand is the fact that after a successful Aryanization process has taken place, the adulterated will no-longer exist. Which also means human-beings will have gone extinct...
Posted by: HikariDude
« on: June 18, 2023, 08:00:12 pm »"What is the supposed inconsistency?"
Do you not count age of consent laws as rules?
"You seem to suggest it is inconsistent to despise "sovereign citizens" while being opposed to age of consent laws."
So is there a consistency between those?
Do you not count age of consent laws as rules?
"You seem to suggest it is inconsistent to despise "sovereign citizens" while being opposed to age of consent laws."
So is there a consistency between those?