Post reply

Name:
Email:
Subject:
Message icon:

Verification:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: January 15, 2026, 06:24:33 pm »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAXN1YYeQyA

False Leftist Cousins still does not understand that the best way to protect Iran, Venezuela, Colombia, etc. is to get the US busy in a war with EU countries first, towards which a US invasion of Greenland is the only move we have at present.

At this late stage, trying to prevent every war is futile. The best we can do is divert war away from where it would produce the worst consequences, which requires positively directing it elsewhere. (The same logic applies to why I keep saying China should invade Siberia: I am trying to protect Taiwan and Japan.)

The Russia vs Ukraine war is the best event that has happened in the 21st century so far. As a general rule, we should divert war away from the Global South and towards the Global North:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/issues/diplomatic-decolonization/msg22279/#msg22279

Quote

(Note the accurate inclusion of Israel within the Global North in the above map. Actually, a strong case can be made for countries such as Argentina to also be included within the Global North: https://trueleft.createaforum.com/colonial-era/argentina/ )

See also:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/war/
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: December 24, 2025, 05:15:15 pm »

Since you posted this video in this topic, please state what you consider to be wrong about the video.
Posted by: Dark Knight
« on: December 24, 2025, 05:32:00 am »

Why are right wing grifters all like Batman villains?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVMXAcSLULU

Former leader of the Aryanism site had a very similar blog post to this back in 2017.
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: October 18, 2025, 03:34:33 pm »

I do not trust Nair one bit, and reject his claim to speaks for the Global South. He is a False Left Duginist:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/enemies/duginism/msg29432/?topicseen#msg29432

Not only does he perceive Russia as not being Western/"European", but he tries to caricature anyone who is hostile to Russia as believing "Russians are evil and Ukrainians are good", which is obviously not the case with us. We celebrate both Russian and Ukrainian deaths! That they are killing each other means less work for us in the future! Why would we want them to stop? This True Left position should be the Global South position!

Lottaz is also a False Left Duginist, as he complains about anti-Russian bias (and compares it to anti-Jewish bias in National Socialist Germany!), as well as promoting multiple other False Left Duginists such as Sachs, Mearsheimer, etc..
Posted by: SodaPop
« on: October 18, 2025, 01:55:52 pm »

Unstoppable Change Will DESTROY Western Racist Hegemony | Chandran Nair
Quote
Has the world finally woken up to Western hypocrisy? How do we understand the power dynamics that have shaped our world for 500 years? What happens now that the veil of a 'liberal world order' has been lifted for the 85% of the world living outside the West?

To explore these questions, I'm joined by Chandran Nair, a Malaysian businessman and scholar. He is the founder of The Global Institute for Tomorrow, an independent think-tank based in Hong Kong and Kuala Lumpur.

In our conversation, we explore the deep roots of colonialism and racism in today's geopolitics, dissecting how events in Gaza have become a clarifying moment for the world. We also touch upon the shifting global economic order, Europe's subordination to the US, and the myth of deglobalization.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xya8bK4wxkc

Reiterating a warning from 90SRF which was shared with myself, never underestimate the survivalist mindset and it's aptitude for survival! Same reason you should never underestimate the Yahwist consciousness...
Posted by: rp
« on: October 10, 2025, 10:52:03 pm »

https://x.com/KyleKulinski/status/1886961510519378212?t=U6G2ozKrOyjPzSzkEuKOOQ&s=19
Quote
MAGA is a fascist cult. They openly support genocide and imperialism. They've regressed to dark ages morality and are completely smug and oblivious about it.
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: October 03, 2025, 06:14:06 pm »

I'm not saying don't post his videos, but you should also critique them as you post them.
Posted by: rp
« on: October 03, 2025, 06:02:20 pm »

I do like some of his other videos.
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: October 03, 2025, 05:09:34 pm »

www.tiktok.com/@theexaltedone666/video/7549975480431021334

I am finally starting to figure this guy out. I warned against this type on the main site:

Quote
the only disagreement within leftist circles is whether – the paganist view – traditional non-Western societies were virtually flawless prior to Western interruption, or whether – the National Socialist view - non-Western societies were already fallen long before Western interruption

I'm not saying don't post his videos, but you should also critique them as you post them.
Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: October 03, 2025, 04:49:32 pm »

Swaddling is imprisonment. Why is this idiot complimenting it?

As a matter of fact:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swaddling

Quote
During Tudor times, swaddling involved wrapping the new baby in linen bands from head to foot to ensure the baby would grow up without physical deformity. A stay band would be attached to the forehead and the shoulders to secure the head. Babies would be swaddled like this until about 8 or 9 months.[9]

so his claim about swaddling being exclusively non-Western is also false in the first place.

More about swaddling:

Quote
A child unswaddled would need constant watching; well swaddled it is cast into a corner and its cries are ignored
...
swaddling, particularly where the head is covered, reduces the baby's ability to cool its body temperature
...
swaddling simulates a strait jacket and prevents baby from moving their arms to self-settle.

I have always said that humans should look to gorillas to learn about childcare.
Posted by: rp
« on: October 03, 2025, 01:10:53 pm »

Posted by: rp
« on: October 03, 2025, 08:31:15 am »

Posted by: rp
« on: October 02, 2025, 09:38:22 pm »

Posted by: 90sRetroFan
« on: October 01, 2025, 06:08:37 pm »

Claiming Jews were not "white" in the US until the 20th century is false, as we have extensively documented:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/jews-have-nothing-in-common-with-us!/msg23429/?topicseen#msg23429

Quote
European Jews have been legally classified as white since the first US census in 1790, were legally white for the purposes of the Naturalization Act of 1790 that limited citizenship to "free White person(s)", and that they could find no legislative or judicial evidence that American Jews had ever been considered collectively non-white.[88]

Next, there is no contradiction in Jim Crow-era US saying an American of Japanese ancestry is "non-white" due to being non-"Caucasian" and also saying an American of Indian ancestry is "non-white" despite being "Caucasian". It simply means "Caucasianness" is a necessary but insufficient condition for "whiteness". This guy does not appear to understand elementary logic.

Also, originally, "Asian" meant Anatolian, not "Chinese, Japanese or Korean", as we have pointed out over and over again:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/colonial-era/russia-the-last-colonial-empire/msg12797/#msg12797

In older British Empire documents, Chinese/Japanese/Koreans/etc. were labelled as "Orientals" whie "Asian" was reserved for Indians/Pakistanis/Bangladeshis/etc.:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orient#British_English

Quote
In British English, the term Oriental is sometimes still used to refer to people from East and Southeast Asia (such as those from China, Taiwan, Japan, Korea, Mongolia, Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Malaysia, Singapore, Myanmar, Philippines, Indonesia, Timor-Leste and Brunei).[12] Judges in the United Kingdom have been issued with guidelines to encourage political correctness where oriental should be avoided because it is imprecise and may be considered racist or offensive.[13][14] Oriental is still a common name for Chinese takeaways and traditional chip shops in Britain.[15][16]

"Asian" in Great Britain usually refers to people who come specifically from South Asia (in particular Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Maldives, Bhutan, and Afghanistan), since British Asians as a whole make up approximately 9.3% of the population within the United Kingdom, and people of an ethnically South Asian background comprise the largest group within this category.[17] "Orientals" refers exclusively to people of East and Southeast Asian origin, who constitute approximately 0.7% of the UK population as a whole. Of these, the majority are of Chinese descent.[18] Orient is also a word for the lustre of a fine pearl.[19] Hong Kong, a former British colony, has been called "Pearl of the Orient" along with Shanghai. In the UK, and much of the commonwealth, it is not considered a pejorative term, with many East Asian people choosing to use it themselves - notably in the names of East Asian businesses such as restaurants and takeaway outlets.

This is still inaccurate, but at least somewhat less so by Roman standards:

Quote
This is particularly relevant when referring to lands and peoples not associated with the historic "Orient": outside of the former Byzantine (Eastern Roman) Empire and Sasanian Empire (Persia)

To claim that Chinese etc. were labelled"Asian" first and Indians etc. became "Asian" later is flat-out false. Even in the US, "Oriental" was in use for the former until relatively recently as a consequence of False Leftist pressure:

Quote
"With the U.S.A. anti-war movement in the '60s and early '70s, many Asian Americans identified the term 'Oriental' with a Western process of racializing Asians as forever opposite 'others'",[21] by making a distinction between "Western" and "Eastern" ancestral origins.
...
In 2016, President Obama signed New York Congresswoman Grace Meng's legislation H.R. 4238 replacing the word with Asian American in federal law.[22][23]

Also, the whole notion of associating "white" supremacism with capitalism is absurd. If it were true, why was the less capitalist Confederacy more strongly "white" supremacist than the more capitalist Union?
Posted by: rp
« on: October 01, 2025, 07:59:08 am »