Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - HikariDude

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 13
1
True Left vs False Left / Re: True Left breakthrough: antinatalism
« on: March 13, 2026, 05:41:07 am »
"Yes. It would be part of 3)."

Thanks for clarifying

2
True Left vs False Left / Re: True Left breakthrough: antinatalism
« on: March 12, 2026, 07:53:59 pm »
"They would also be prohibited from reproducing. (Reproduction itself is initiated violence, remember?)"
Well yeah I remember. I meant if we end the extinction of the predatory bloodlines first, we would still have the prey bloodlines.

"Actually, an alternative proposal is that if the prey species go extinct first, the predator species will follow automatically."
I might know what you mean regarding that problem since it is not that far from the final step - eliminating the predator species thereafter. Is it? Because reproducing predators (in contrast to reproducing pacifists) at least the reproduction is almost excused by the elimination. (Would antinatalist Aryanists still need to eliminate the remaining predator bloodlines if their reproduction continues?)

3
True Left vs False Left / Re: True Left breakthrough: antinatalism
« on: March 12, 2026, 07:46:14 am »
"We have to end this first before we can safely leave."

But would the less competitive animals in that case not still reproduce if they are saved before we go extinct?

Of course it is more important that the more competitive bloodlines (regardless of species) should be eliminated sooner.
But after that happens, should we (not myself of course as I refrain from reproduction) not still eliminate the less competitive bloodlines - who would eventually be more competent than us by that time?

4
Questions & Debates / Re: Random Thoughts....
« on: December 14, 2025, 07:23:55 am »
Makes sense.

And I actually kind of prefer paper and fire balloons better than plastic and helium balloons. Plastic balloons are kind of clownish (which frightens me). Paper balloons (and hot air balloons) just seem heartwarming.

5
Questions & Debates / Re: Random Thoughts....
« on: December 13, 2025, 06:55:52 pm »
I think you might have mentioned a similar point here about jeans:
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/issues/dress-decolonization/msg5622/#msg5622
The difference be that the Counterculture let it remain and never tried hard to discover anything beyond it.

But nonetheless, do they still not have the least chemical reactivity (and thus the most nobility) of all modern gases? Why would we still praise balloons and neon tubes (both which use noble gases)?

“The world we should never have left is the one in which only the pre-Renaissance elements were known:”
Some of those are noble metals (like gold and platinum), which are also supposedly resistant to corrosion. Not that it be purely true, but in theory, the most resistant to corrosion is also the least conditioned.

6
Questions & Debates / Re: Random Thoughts....
« on: December 13, 2025, 02:15:42 pm »
What do balloons, neon tubes and even plasma displays have in common? Answer:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noble_gas
Quote
The noble gases (historically the inert gases, sometimes referred to as aerogens[1]) are the members of group 18 of the periodic table: helium (He), neon (Ne), argon (Ar), krypton (Kr), xenon (Xe), radon (Rn) and, in some cases, oganesson (Og). Under standard conditions, the first six of these elements are odorless, colorless, monatomic gases with very low chemical reactivity and cryogenic boiling points. The properties of oganesson are uncertain.

So the least conditioned gases are the most noble gases. Sounds Aryan to me.


7
Volunteer / Re: Aryanism.net Book
« on: October 08, 2025, 03:23:47 pm »
Leave 90sRF alone. Give him time like you said you would.
From the main site:
Quote
In general, due regard for anyone engaged in a task is important. Except in the face of true emergencies, others should try their best not to disturb him. All offers of assistance in the task should be made prior to the beginning of work; once work has commenced, no further offers of assistance by others should be made, as this could adversely affect the confidence of the worker by implying that he needs help. If during the course of the task the worker finds that he indeed needs help, it is up to him to request it.

One delegated to do a task is obliged to inform the delegator of any relevant changes in circumstance, or of how the task is going in general. The delegator is not obliged to (and should not) regularly “check up on” the delegate in order to ask how the task is going, as again this could adversely affect the confidence of the delegate. In absence of news from the delegate, the delegator is only to assume the task is proceeding smoothly and steadily. (If it turns out otherwise, the delegate thus demonstrates that he is undutiful.)

PS: Quit calling him ‘AS’. In this site, he identifies as 90sRetroFan. That’s like transphobes identifying people by their biological gender like it matters so much.

8
Counterculture Era / Re: Is Counterculture Still Alive?
« on: September 14, 2025, 07:16:26 pm »
That’s actually a good point.
Though for the point about cars, sadly not every city/neighborhood is pedestrian friendly. Considering roads that are relatively large and distant, no wonder why people drive. To say nothing that some of them have crappy road management (which usually attracts crappy drivers, traffic policing, DMVs, etc) leading to more pedestrians involved in car accidents. Why do Westerners make simple living so difficult?

9
Counterculture Era / Re: Counterculture and Western Civilisation
« on: September 14, 2025, 02:29:34 pm »
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/issues/social-decolonization/msg21031/#msg21031
Quote
A better definition of "improvement" would be low body fat (achievable through cardio exercises such as running/swimming), which would produce a physique similar to Arno Breker statues.

While exercise does make it easier for non-ectomorphs to look like ectomorphs, most gym freaks would rather prefer to look like mesomorphs (achievable through strength training exercises).

This is in contrast to the most popular exercise of the Counterculture era:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerobic_exercise#History
Quote
After World War II, health-oriented recreational activities such as jogging became popular.[19] The Royal Canadian Air Force Exercise Plans, developed by Dr. Bill Orban and published in 1961, helped to launch modern fitness culture.[20][21]

Physical therapists Col. Pauline Potts and Dr. Kenneth H. Cooper,[22] both of the United States Air Force, advocated the concept of aerobic exercise. In the 1960s, Cooper started research into preventive medicine. He conducted the first extensive research on aerobic exercise on over 5,000 U.S. Air Force personnel[23][24] after becoming intrigued by the belief that exercise can preserve one's health. In 1966 he coined the term "aerobics". Two years later, in 1968, he published a book of the same name. In 1970, he created the Cooper Institute for non-profit research and education devoted to preventive medicine. He published a mass-market version of his book The New Aerobics in 1979. Cooper encouraged millions into becoming active and is now known as the "father of aerobics".[25][26] Cooper's book inspired Jacki Sorensen to create aerobic dancing exercise routines, which grew in popularity in the 1970s in the U.S., and at the same time, Judi Missett developed and expanded Jazzercise.

In the 1970s, there was a running boom. It was inspired by the Olympics, the New-York marathon and the advent of cushioned shoes.[27]

Aerobics at home became popular worldwide after the release of Jane Fonda's Workout exercise video in 1982.[28][29] Step aerobics was popular in the 1990s, driven by a step product and program from Reebok shoes.
when ectomorphy was worshipped.

Aerobics/cardio can also be comparable to the stamina based labor of Neolithic subsistence farmers:
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/aryan-hearts/

What do you think of aerobics?

10
Questions & Debates / Re: Progressive Faustianism
« on: September 12, 2025, 09:35:26 pm »
“people of various different physiques/net worths/qualifications/etc. who all say that what they've got makes them feel confident, which would appear contrary to your proposal, but how many are telling the truth?”
Seems like confidence can based off of various kinds of parameters (as opposed to an amount of people that claim to base it off of certain parameters).

“People who lack confidence often try to portray themselves as supremely confident, so it is not always immediately clear whose apparent confidence is real and whose is an act.”
Sounds like most selfish people. They seem to lack confidence themselves leading them to focus on themselves more than others (which is ignoble especially if there is no completion point).

I read on a Reddit post about Jung’s concept of confidence and self esteem, which is about overcoming fears and other natural conditioning that leads to low confidence. This helps to resist selective pressure and to prevent any more loss of original nobility.

11
Questions & Debates / Re: Progressive Faustianism
« on: September 12, 2025, 06:31:34 pm »
“Because shorter "whites" still have partial Giant ancestry, whereas even taller "non-whites" do not”
I guess that is valid considering the majority of “non-white” NBA players (including “non-black” “non-white” players like Lin, Misaka, etc) have less giant blood compared to “white” players:
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/sexual-dimorphism-preferences/msg7138/#msg7138
An example of short Giants would be pre-MJ MTV artists:
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/counterculture-era/alice-cooper-vs-homophobia/msg3629/#msg3629

But you still haven’t confirmed whether or not:
Quote
unlike non-Western confidence, [Western (including Eurocentric) confidence] is always directed towards one side of the spectrum (regardless if someone expands it or a Eurocentrist follows it) as opposed to a part of the spectrum that helps complete their purpose?
The first point I tried to confirm

12
Questions & Debates / Re: Progressive Faustianism
« on: September 12, 2025, 10:05:37 am »
“All I have observed is that taller "white" tourists tend to get better treatment than shorter "white" tourists, but even shorter "white" tourists get better treatment than taller "non-white" tourists.”
Then why is giant worship still a reason for it?

13
Questions & Debates / Re: Progressive Faustianism
« on: September 11, 2025, 08:34:33 pm »
“I don't understand what you mean.”
Wouldn't giants visiting former colonies and other non-Western countries (especially those not visited by giants) have been sort of like Faustianism and progressivism as if they were the first/biggest to visit those countries (or cities, neighborhoods, etc) and appear in their surroundings’ eyes. Not saying it is Faustian (regardless whether or not it is) since Faustianism is not in their minds. Just saying what it appears to their surroundings.

“What is 'it'?”
Westernized (including Eurocentric) confidence.

14
Questions & Debates / Re: Progressive Faustianism
« on: September 11, 2025, 04:20:41 pm »
“Giant-worship by non-Giant Gentiles:”

Do you think giants’ heights have a little Faustianism in non-Western countries? This includes countries without exposure to giants, and hence wouldn’t some Faustianism come into play (though the “whites” have not intended so)?
So even if Eurocentrists make a mistaken assumption about pigmentation, they surely would not make one about height (another parameter in the first previous post).

But do you agree that, unlike non-Western confidence, it is always directed towards one side of the spectrum (regardless if someone expands it or a Eurocentrist follows it) as opposed to a part of the spectrum that helps complete their purpose?

15
Questions & Debates / Re: Progressive Faustianism
« on: September 10, 2025, 06:51:06 pm »
“an individual Faustian or individual progressive may not be consciously thinking about expansion when they do their stuff.”
Are you trying to say expansionism =/= Faustianism/Progressivism?

“Why can a "white" not be only a Faustian but not a progressive, or only a progressive but not a Faustian, or even neither a Faustian nor a progressive, and still have "non-white" Eurocentrist followers?”
Because they belong to an identity of Faustians/Progressives that have already colonized so much that colonized people see them as these high status that seek for some sort of approval/glory, which according to their Nietzschean/Achillean (both Western) desires is sign of their naturalist success.
So in a way, Faustians and Progressives (and sovereign neocolonialists) might have had some role in Eurocentrists’ perceptions

Why do you think Eurocentrists follow “whites”?

“because are neocolonialists”

Are all “whites” Faustians/Progressives? I predict you say ‘no’ considering not all “whites” are machinists:
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/leftists-against-progressivism/msg30896/#msg30896

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 13