"voluntary transaction activities do not result in a “non-violent” condition."
Yes, they do. Voluntary = non-violent.
Voluntary transactions give rise to a social order structured around economic activity governed by the laws of the market mechanism. These laws systematically generate social stratification, in which actors who are aggressive, competitive, dynamic, and innovative are structurally positioned to prevail in transactions and to appropriate the circulation of money within the economy. Conversely, those who are weak, vulnerable, sensitive, and more empathetic are structurally disadvantaged, tending to lose in market competition and to be excluded from access to economic circulation. Their systematic failure produces structural poverty and social brutalization, arising from the dominance and victorious position of aggressive market actors.
To date, you have failed to provide a concrete historical or empirical example in which the application of market mechanism laws has succeeded in abolishing social brutality, racism, and socially conditioned aggressiveness. For this reason, I continue to maintain my position.
Disadvantages of a Market Economy
Disadvantage =/= violence.
Poverty, social violence, and practices of domination exercised by actors who are aggressive, dynamic, innovative, and psychopathic over those who are sensitive, empathetic, and cooperative constitute structural consequences of the enforcement of market laws and of economic activity that is not centrally planned, but instead unfolds spontaneously and through voluntary transactions.
These consequences function as material barriers to the establishment of socialism and to the abolition of violence that has arisen from the operation of these so-called natural laws of the market economy.And yet, where exactly is the socialist movement that still accepts economic activity organized around voluntary transactions governed by so-called natural market laws? I contend that no genuine socialist movement has ever accepted such an economic conception, for it stands in direct contradiction to the very foundations of socialism itself.
Moreover, there is no historical evidence that Hitler—the figure you hold up as a model—ever endorsed the application of market laws or so-called “voluntary transactions.” You should therefore cease invoking Hitler as an inspiration in both online and offline political discussion forums. Hitler supported a planned economic structure rather than an economy based on voluntary transactions governed by supposedly natural market mechanisms.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
War has given rise to poverty everywhere, this indicates a chronic crisis in the body of an obsolete system [Additional information from my friend]