At last a semi-sane ruling:
The court said conditions under the Taliban are so bad for women that individual assessment of asylum applications is now unnecessary.
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has ruled that each of the 20 million women in Afghanistan would qualify for refugee status inside the European Unionwithout the need for an individual application.
...
By listing the Islamist domestic policies of the Taliban, which returned to power in 2021, the whole package was interpreted as impairing human dignity through its cumulative effect.
But why only women? Plenty of Afghan men dislike Taliban domestic policies also. Is their human dignity not similarly impaired by having to pay taxes to fund policies they disagree with? Hence should the EU not similarly accept them as refugees?
With few reasons to doubt this description, the question remains whether the rulingaccepting any and every Afghani woman without the need for an individual asylum applicationis the right response.
Of course it is! And Afghan men should be accepted in the exact same way! And this principle should be expanded to apply not only to Afghanistan but to all countries!
it sets a legal precedent for would-be female refugees to argue that their own home states, such as some Gulf Cooperation Council members, create an equally hostile environment.
This is the point! And again, why only females? Why are Westerners so bad at ignoring gender and just treating people as people?