True Left

>That is their fault, not mine. And their reaction only further proves my point.

Gahahhahahaha for someone who supposedly makes compassion the focus of their worldview, you certainly understand nothing about people. Are you comfortable with Backlash Herding then? Are you going to forget how raceless and malleable people are? Is that really it?

Because I can go to the same exact people you speak of, and invite them to work with their neighbors (regardless of ethnicity) to create community organizations that help facilitate Folkic celebrations and grassroots social services that brings their community together. Which method, my good friend, do you think actually reduces racial tensions?

>When do the "white" Manifest Destiny occupiers (which I what I think you mean) intend to return the land they stole? I am not even demanding that they personally emigrate. All they need to do is refrain from reproducing, and the land will cease to be inherited by their descendants. They refuse to do even this. This tells us all we need to know about them.

Many "white" people are not related to Western colonizers, do they get the Gulag too? I don't think Native people are too happy with "blacks" and "Asians" occupying their land either. Are you going to flip out when they refuse to refrain from reproducing? We all know Natalists suck, but your misanthropy has clearly made you delusional and politically useless.

>Which will prove my point about them.

No you idiot. If I were to make fun of you for being short, you'd probably end up finding a way to be proud of being short, even if its something you didn't care about before. Replace "shortness" with something actually bad, and the same affect occurs.

>If X steals from Y, then Z inherits the stolen item from X, and Z refuses to return it to Y on the grounds that Z was not the one who personally stole it, what does that tell us about Z?

This isn't even what we were talking about, you are strawmanning me with the backdrop of the random context you inserted. What do you want then, to empty America of all "white" people? To where, Europe? Return land to their ethnic Natives? Cool way to prevent ethnostates bro.

>And should we listen to someone (you) who then argues Z should not be blamed because blaming Z might lead to Z stealing even more stuff from Y?

I want Americans to recognize the ignobility the US was founded upon, and then come together to move forward and avoid those mistakes. You, on the other hand, want to crap on people for something bad that they were not responsible for, and act surprised when they choose arrogance rather than self-hatred.

>"whites" invented "black"/"brown"/"yellow"/etc. identities as well as the "white" identity.

Either all Americans drop the identity politics, or no one does. Full stop.

>I am not bolstering them. If I were, I would not be using "" around them.

I am going to call someone a piece of "shít" and then say that I didn't mean it, because I put quotes around "shít".

>It is socially acceptable for "non-whites" to be aware of who is oppressing them. As it should be.

You think "blacks" don't get screwed over people within "their own" group, or don't get help from those outside of it? Yes, "blacks" have to deal with racism and that should be addressed. But you don't seem to realize that the "blacks" being ACTUALLY oppressed like no other are the nine year olds in lithium mines, not consumerist Americans.

>Which gene pool invented electronics?

Which gene pools USE and IMPROVE them? Hint: virtually of them. Whatever happened to treating people like individuals?

>The same gene pool which invented electronics is the one actually controlling what the future will be like by its ongoing inventions

You really are doing Wignats a great service by attributing every modern invention to "whites" LOL. Besides, if you're concerned about electronics, then the demographic "gene pool" to oppose are the technocrats. And surprise! You'll find Technocrats everywhere; a marvel of human diversity if you ask me.

>Any "non-white" who still uses an identity (e.g. "black") given to them by "whites" does not yet hate "whites" enough. Encouraging hatred towards "whites" will lead to disgust towards identities invented by "whites", and hence ceasing to use them.

So you want people to hate identity politics by using identity politics to defeat identity politics? Truly a stroke of genius, I think I get it now.

This demonstrably does not work. BLM riled up quite a bit of hatred towards "whites" but did it cause "blacks" to drop their tribal consciousness? Nope, it only skyrocketed. Did it make "whites" any less racist? Nope, it only popularized racist groups.

>That is their fault, not mine. In any case, I am not addressing "whites" in the first place. I am addressing their victims.

Uhhh no. There are really no true complete living victims in the West. Everyone lives off of the suffering of animals, the devastation of the Earth, past genocides, and neocolonialism. Anything beyond that is a pissing match between people arguing who is getting screwed over less. Besides, hasn't this entire conversation been about the need to instill some good ole "white" guilt?

>I am telling their victims: there is nothing wrong with wanting to kill your oppressors. You are telling their victims: wanting to kill your oppressors might upset your oppressors.

Nope. I am saying that this is a classic case of slavemasters strategically throwing goy biscuits into a crowd to make different factions within it turn on each other, rather than charge into the bank.