True Left

Firstly, the answer to your question: Eurocentrist Xi.

Secondly, I would not want Australia becoming Chinese territory. Australia should be Nusantaran territory. Chinese territorial expansion should happen northwards.

Thirdly, Dugin is the one who wants China to be tempted into territorially expanding southwards:

Dugin envisions the fall of China. The People's Republic of China, which represents an extreme geopolitical danger as an ideological enemy to the independent Russian Federation, "must, to the maximum degree possible, be dismantled". Dugin suggests that Russia start by taking Tibet–Xinjiang–Inner Mongolia–Manchuria as a security belt.[1] Russia should offer China help "in a southern direction – Indochina (except Vietnam, whose people is already pro-Russia), the Philippines, Indonesia, Australia" as geopolitical compensation.[9]

However, I re-emphasize my belief that China's current lack of interest in Australia is not due to anti-Duginism, but merely due to being too psychologically colonized (hence also lack of interest in taking back Manchuria etc.).

India lacks pre-colonial-era historical ties to Australia. India is not the only former victim of British colonialism, so by your reasoning every former victim of British colonialism would have a similarly valid claim to Australia. In that case who should rule Australia?

You seem to be confusing economic justice (which is to be sought by migration by former victims of Western colonialism to the territories of former colonial powers) with statal ownership of territory. I would not mind Australia being demographically 100% populated by people of Indian ancestry, but that population should not be paying taxes to India, but should be paying taxes to whomever rules Australia in the future (preferably Nusantara). People of Indian ancestry in future Australia will be equivalent to people of Indian ancestry in present-day Singapore.

I disagree. Unless the Indian government offers the same security guarantee to all migrants from all countries to all countries, it would be applying an ingroup-outgroup double-standard. It should be the local government that offers any such security guarantees to immigrants. It is the one with the pragmatic incentive to do so, after all, since it wants to keep them around paying taxes, and indeed attract more immigrants (and hence their tax money) if possible based on the positive reviews of existing immigrants.

LET'S NUKE RUSSIA!!!!!!! NUKE RUSSIA NOW!!! **** IT!!! NUKE PUTIN AND RUSSIA ASAP!!!!! NUKE RUSSIA NOW!!!!

So what is NATO waiting for?

The countries boycotting Durban IV were: Albania, Australia, Austria, Bulgaria, Canada, Colombia, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Estonia, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Honduras, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Moldova, Netherlands, New Zealand, North Macedonia, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Ukraine, UK, US and Uruguay. The European Union also did not participate or speak at the commemoration.

Hmm, Albania?

In 2008, direct commercial flights began between the two countries.[19] The countries also agreed to eliminate the need for tourist visas between them.[20]

In 2020, Albania became the first Muslim-majority country to formally adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s definition of anti-Semitism and promise to fight anti-Jewish prejudice.[4] The measure to adopt the definition was proposed by Socialist Party MP Taulant Balla, and accepted unanimously by the Parliament of Albania.[4][31]

False Leftist stupidity:



China's best move is to offer a folkist deal to India whereby India, without needing to risk any Indian troops, receives a significant fraction of however much of Siberia's resources China manages to acquire. If India then were to sabotage China's invasion of Siberia, it would be sabotaging its own only chance (since India has no way to invade Siberia from its own territory) to access these resources. It should not be difficult for India to conclude that it gains far less from sabotaging China than by simply waiting to receive the free resources.

Woke comments:

I think you VASTLY overestimate the threat posed by India to China in the event of a Sino-Russian War.

I don't see how India would invade China. For India to do an invasion of China, they'd to go through the Himalaya's and just don't see that happening. There is territorial disputes in the area, but both China and India knows the cost of going to war with one another would be devastating to both.

Both nations have strict no first use policies regarding their nukes and operating military aircraft over the Himalayas has the same difficulties to overcome as civilian airliners. Thise can be overcome, but only in small scale operations. Any war between India and China will be of limited scale and result in no significant exchange of territory, only loss of life.

China invading Russia to get their own oil in Siberia....... Timing? Now? Russia can not win on 1 front, so most certainly Russia can not win on 2 fronts. Wait untill Ukraine is victorious? Russian men of fighting age will have been exterminated by then, but Russia is putting everything in building a military industrial complex at this moment , and that capacity would ba available when they stop fighting Ukraine. Seems to me this would be the ideal time for China if they want to take the Siberian oil.

The Nazis called it "liebensraum".... What will the chinese call it??

China will benefit if it takes areas like Lake Baikal and leaves Taiwan alone.

Taiwan which has preserved the culture while continuing to develop.

Taiwans main value to China, is a technological and economic powerhouse, that will never pose any serious threat. Instead, the cultural bonds, if carefully nurtured, would make an excellent ally in practice.

fingers crossed for a Mandate of Heaven to overthrow Xi

Chinese invasion of Mongolia is likely to 
2:18
push Chinese-Russian relations into outward  hostility

This is what China should want, as in so doing it would gain many new allies among countries currently hostile to Russia.

and simultaneously double China's 
2:23
border with Russia

This is thinking about it backwards. Instead, we should think that it would double Russia's border with China. Who should be more worried about a longer border: Russia or China?

at a time when China would much rather focus its military attention into the East and South China

2:32
seas.

This is precisely the mistake that Dugin wants China to make: https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/war/msg29540/#msg29540

And with no Russian troops there, Mongolia  is effectively a buffer state between China and 
2:37
Russia.

Again, this is thinking about it backwards. Instead, we should think that, with no Chinese troops there, Mongolia is effectively a buffer state between Russia and China. It is Russia that benefits more from such a buffer state (which is precisely why Russia set it up in the first place: https://trueleft.createaforum.com/colonial-era/russia-the-last-colonial-empire/msg15079/#msg15079 ) So why not remove this benefit from Russia?

there are still
3:36
very few reasons for China to invade Mongolia. It  wouldn't gain access to any mineral wealth that 
3:41
doesn't already dominate through trade

What about the mineral wealth in Russia that it could far more easily acquire later by invading Mongolia now?

it would have to rule over 3 million people who definitely don't want to be ruled by China.

Which is far fewer than the equivalent number in Taiwan. Therefore we should minimally agree that China invading Mongolia instead of Taiwan would be an immense improvement. (To say nothing about the racial gulf between Taiwanese and Mongolians such that eliminating the latter's bloodlines would only improve racial quality whereas far more care is required in dealing with the former's bloodlines.)

Related:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/ancient-world/re-turanian-diffusion/msg31420/#msg31420

Turanist comments:

Disagree. Shallow research. Mongolia have own long history and culture, language that define as unique to any other country. We been here as nomads, hunters for 5000 years with China and Russia. All this times we invade china and russia some point also lost recognition some point. But we never lost our uniq identity as Mongols. You will suprise that Mongols have independent happy rich country that 3 million people with enuogh recouce to survive next 5000 years. Hope you learn better undestanding of geography and world. Stop being stupid and ignorant. Disrespectful to Mongolian people.

Take it back? You better be careful when you talk about Mongols. We invented Russia and China. That is why we can manage our selfs😂😂😂 you will never understand

This is why it would be a good thing for your bloodlines to be eliminated.