True Left

Imagine two people, one of whom is using an air conditioner to cool their own room by blowing the hot air into other person's room. When the other person objects, the air conditioner user says: "I'm not forcing to you use an air conditioner in your room, therefore you shouldn't force me to not use an air conditioner in my room."

You cannot demand privacy when your actions affect others.

Just remember Western civilization is an air conditioner:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/questions-debates/debate-with-the-progressives/msg14389/#msg14389

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/truth-knowledge/msg15668/#msg15668

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/true-left-breakthrough-folkish-imperialism/msg14823/#msg14823

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/debunking-rightist-anti-immigration-arguments/msg9868/#msg9868

See also:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/true-left-breakthrough-folkish-imperialism/msg10902/#msg10902

A non-industrial country does not prevent an industrial country from successful industry, therefore the industrial country is unjustified in invading the non-industrial country. A non-compulsory-schooling country does not prevent a compulsory-schooling scountry from successful compulsory schooling, therefore the compulsory-schooling country is unjustified in invading the non-compulsory-schooling country. And so on. (In fact it is the other way round: the non-industrial/non-compulsory-schooling/etc. countries should invade the industrial/compulsory-schooling/etc. countries in order to eradicate industry/compulsory schooling/etc.!)

In general, let X be an idea. If X is something that can succeed only if everyone practices it, invasion to impose X is justified. Whereas if X is something that can succeed with merely a fraction of people practicing it, invasion to spread X is unjustified (but invasion of practitioners by non-practitioners to eradicate X is justified!).