My question:
"(the Chinese) do have a space program, and they do have industry, they do have AI, Et cetera."
Your response:
>Copying whom?
Technocrats. I'm not responsible for something bad, if someone else did it first?
You show a stunning amount of (willful) ignorance of Chinese history, if you ignore all of its eras of violence and technological innovation made by the Chinese well before the Italian Renaissance.
But does this mean the Chinese should go extinct? Yes, as does most of Humanity No. The Han Chinese, much like "whites", are a broad and often vaguely defined group of people. They have been violently Sinicizing people for millennia, which makes the definition of "Han Chinese" just about as vague as "white" is. Consider how the "white" club used to only include the English & French, but eventually, "white" began to mean Germans, Iberians, Italians, and Slavs. Nowadays, when you look at American census forms you'll even see Arabs & Hispanics grouped together as "white". Differences do exist between the Han and "whites", but this fact remains.
My point is that, when you look at broad and often loosely defined groups of people, you see a microcosm of Humanity; the noble, ignoble, and mediocre. Yes, the spiritual Jews exist within all these groups and should be dealt with. But will you actually decrease ethnic discrimination, and ethnic tensions, by lumping the noble and ignoble in one broad group, and say they should all just go extinct, while not applying the same standards to other groups? I think you all know the answer to this.