Author Topic: Right-left (Judeo-)Christian divergence  (Read 5504 times)

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11039
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Right-left (Judeo-)Christian divergence
« on: July 24, 2020, 04:09:54 am »
OLD CONTENT contd.

“Go forth, be fruitful, multiply” -Tanakh
Embedded in the Western psyche is the primitive biological drive to perpetually reproduce

---

www.yahoo.com/news/president-gave-us-much-hope-232747729.html

Quote
When the president beckoned the executives to the lectern to say a few words about their efforts, up first was Lindell — a major Republican donor, the Trump campaign’s chairman for Minnesota and someone who has called Trump the “greatest president” in American history and someone who was “chosen by God.”
...
“God gave us grace on November 8, 2016, to change the course we were on,” Lindell began, referencing the day Trump was elected president. “Taken out of our schools and lives, a nation had turned its back on God.”

Lindell then offered advice to families stuck at home because of various social-distancing guidelines: “I encourage you to use this time at home to get back in the Word, read our Bibles and spend time with our families.”

And this is why we need this reaction:

wbckfm.com/michigan-rep-rashida-tlaib-retweets-f-a-national-day-of-prayer/

---

Think carefully about this statement:

Quote
Europeans were in need of new frontiers to sustain their spirit, and so God ordained them to take lands in New World.

Duchesne explicitly admits that those like him can never be satisfied with what they possess (no matter how much), but will always be "in need of new frontiers". For them it is not about obtaining that which will bring lasting contentment (and thus end desire for more), but rather about endlessly reiterating the action of acquisition itself.

In other words, violently taking for themselves what belongs to others (and justifying it theologically) is what they will keep doing over and over again to everyone else for as long as they are allowed to continue existing. In light of this, how can anyone argue that they should not at the very least be prohibited from reproducing?

---

"Duchesne explicitly admits that those like him can never be satisfied with what they possess (no matter how much), but will always be "in need of new frontiers". For them it is not about obtaining that which will bring lasting contentment (and thus end desire for more), but rather about endlessly reiterating the action of acquisition itself."

This is fundamental to Turanian psychology, which necessarily thrives on the subjugation and plunder of other people, since Turanians, being nomads, did not themselves have a permanent territory which they could call home.

---

us.yahoo.com/huffpost/st-johns-fire-protest-donald-trump-004306778.html

Quote
After a press conference in the Rose Garden Monday evening, Trump walked from the White House to pose in front of St. John’s Church’s sign while holding a Bible. Law enforcement fired tear gas at hundreds of peaceful protesters to clear the way for Trump, The Associated Press reported.
...
Bishop Mariann Budde, leader of The Episcopal Diocese of Washington, told HuffPost that she was “outraged” about Trump’s appearance. “I am going to do everything in my power to disassociate our church from what the president did tonight,” she said.

Trump used the Bible and St. John’s Church as a backdrop for a message that is “antithetical to the teachings of Jesus and everything that our church stands for,” Budde said in a separate statement.

“He did not pray when he came to St. John’s,” Budde said. The president also failed to acknowledge the agony of people of color who are “rightfully demanding an end to 400 years of systemic racism and white supremacy.”

“In no way do we support the President’s incendiary response to a wounded, grieving nation,” she said.



This is beyond self-parody......

---

www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/church-isn-t-saying-black-050024877.html

Quote
This past Sunday, I held my breath, waiting to see what fellow white Christians would tell me about their church services. Would their white pastors speak out directly against racism, proclaim Black Lives Matter, and urge their congregants to join the uprising as white allies? What I feared—and what many of my own social media followers told me—happened. Many pastors opted to either completely ignore George Floyd’s murder (instead adhering to business as usual) or preached vague messages of peace and love. Some even threw in a MLK quote for good measure. Now white Christians have a choice to make. They know where their pastoral leadership stands. Do they stay, or do they walk away?

Christians are supposed to love others as they love themselves. The Bible is clear as day on this. The Bible also says faith without works is dead. Is prayer important in a believer’s life? It’s supposed to be. However, it’s not the sole method of loving God and others. Christians are supposed to be in-action, or as the Bible says, the hands and feet of Jesus. Another verse commands Christians to be “salt and light.”

You may have left the church, or decided it wasn’t for you in the first place, because you believe Christians are hypocrites. They say one thing and do another. I empathize with this pain. Why aren’t congregations across the country on their knees praying for people of color and then taking action by reading books on anti-racism, joining the protests, and electing woke candidates into governmental positions? If you have been jaded by the church, you are certainly not alone.
...
Some white Christians believe politics and social justice have no place in church. They prefer to sit comfortably in pews, sway to music, and hear sermons that coddle their fragility—messages that don’t rock the boat. They are quick to condemn what they believe to be wrong without every recognizing that they are, in fact, upholding white supremacy by doing nothing. They are dangerous, and they don’t even know it, oblivious that their silence is quite loud. They also believe that by sponsoring African children, using diversity stock photos on their websites, and being nice to people of color (including their “one black friend”), they are clearly not-racist. (Ahem, tokenism much?)

I truly believe that churches, just like each person, are either anti-racist or racist. Author Ibram X. Kendi explains that there’s no gray area or neutrality when it comes to racism.
...
saying nothing is saying something: that black lives do not matter.
...
A pastor who claims God loves everyone should also be willing to lay down his life for another. That’s what a true friend does, as the Bible says. We are supposed to be putting others before ourselves. We are also commanded to empathize, to weep with those who weep.

If white Christians continue to support their complacent and “neutral” churches with their efforts and dollars, they are choosing to continue to harm their black brothers and sisters. Subjecting children to whitewashed, white privileged teachings means raising future racists. Likewise, giving tithes (that Christian talk for financial donations to the church) to an entity that upholds whiteness is feeding white supremacy.



I would put it even more strongly: you can either be "white", or you can be Christian, but you can't be both.

---

Our enemies are conceding Christianity to us:

www.counter-currents.com/2020/06/speak-the-truth-or-kiss-it-all-goodbye/

Quote
These are very dark days, but one fact shines out: this is not happening because the mobs have more power than we do. It is happening because we are allowing it to happen. We have given them the power they have. A healthy society, a healthy white majority that was sure of itself and morally unconfused, could have shut these mobs down in one day. But what of the Leftist elite? Don’t they have greater power than us? There too, they derive their power from our consent. We have consented to make them moral authorities. We have allowed them to define the limits of “acceptable” discourse. Cravenly, we have again and again conceded them the moral high ground. Why? Ultimately, the reason has to do with the fact that Leftist ideology is the distilled essence of a certain sermon on a certain mount, which we have all been virtue-signaling our approval of, but never fully believing in, for almost two thousand years.

As I have said before, we are not "cultural Marxists". If anything, we are cultural Christians. And now even our enemies are gradually understanding this.

---

Is Hanukkah a Racist Holiday?*
www.westernspring.co.uk/is-hanukkah-a-racist-holiday/

*YES

Quote
If it was a holiday for non-Jewish Whites seeking to jump out of the melting pot and have their own culture and not be assimilated it would be called that.

You be the judge. Substitute Whites for Jews and imagine what anti-White bigots might be saying about it.

Antiochus IV Epiphanes of Syria, a ruler who sought to end conflict among people, tried to make his empire a peaceful place by eradicating differences among the diverse groups in his empire (sound familiar?).

This well-intentioned, or evil, ruler, depending on your point of view, wanted all people to have one religion (his religion) so that there would be no religious disputes. He also wanted all people to have one culture (his) so there would be no cultural disputes, and he wanted all people to be of one race (his) so there would be no racial disputes. His solution was to create a great melting pot (familiar concept, isn’t it?) where various minority peoples–and especially the Jews–would be assimilated into his brave new world.

A few “extremist” Jews (i.e., those who didn’t agree) said “No thanks, we like ourselves just as we are.” These grassroots “extremists,” led by Judah Maccabee, a peasant, resisted blending in, and they were hated and reviled as what we would now call “racists,” “bigots,” “extremists,” “separatists,” supremacists,” etc., and, to coin a term, “judeocentric.”

Not all Jews helped Maccabee. In fact, the elites of Jewish society favored the blending away of the Jews (much as our modern elites favor the blending away of whites) and they helped the tyrant in his attempt at assimilating Jews into non-existence.

The “extremist” Maccabees, weren’t having it and they fought against both the Syrian tyrant and their own Jewish elites. In time, the Maccabees won, and Jews who didn’t assimilate, became the only Jews, and they celebrated their victory over the forces of assimilation with Hanukkah.

So, Hanukkah was about Jews being able to have their own identity and religion as they themselves decided was right for themselves, and it was a struggle against their extinction by assimilation.

There are lessons in Hanukkah for both modern Jews and non-Jews alike.

Isn’t it time, today, for more Maccabean type of thinking? But from non-Jewish awakened Whites, this time?

The evil forces that want to blend all nations, all religions and all races together are working overtime to accomplish this and their primary target is White people and White nations.

If they can flood formerly White nations with enough non-Whites, nature will take over and the White genotype will be absorbed into the non-White genotype and Whites will go extinct. Look around where you live. Isn’t it starting to look less White? It’s not your imagination. You’re seeing genocide in action on a daily basis.

Evil is creeping in on soft feet. It is White extinction that is happening right in front of our eyes with one act of bedroom genocide at a time, and we are being told that “diversity,” “multi-culturalism,” “the rainbow of humanity,” is a good thing and that if we want to remain White, it is a bad thing.

Whites should not buy the lies and they should trust their eyes and their reason and they should struggle to stay White in all ways possible.

One can almost imagine Antiochus singing John Lennon’s song, IMAGINE.

Funny, when you hear Lennon singing this, the blending away of distinct races, nations and religions doesn’t sound evil, does it?

But, it is evil to those of us who believe that distinct races, nations and religions have a right to exist as they choose to exist and to remain separate and have their own self-identification and self-determination without interference from other races, nations and religions.

Fight the genocide and the haters by having many more White children. The more of us, the better for all of us and the greater the chance that we will survive as Whites.
WNs are confirmed Judeophiles.

---

For the record, the Orthodox Church is more Tanakh-heavy than the others:

Quote
"the "Anagignoskomena" (ἀναγιγνωσκόμενα, "things that are read") comprises ten of the Old Testament books rejected in the Protestant canon,[109] but deemed by the Eastern Orthodox worthy to be read in worship services, even though they carry a lesser esteem than the 39 books of the Hebrew canon.[110] The lowest tier contains the remaining books not accepted by either Protestants or Roman Catholics, among them, Psalm 151."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Orthodox_Church#Bible

Quote
"The Eastern Orthodox canon includes the deuterocanonical books listed above, plus 3 Maccabees and 1 Esdras (also included in the Clementine Vulgate), while Baruch is divided from the Epistle of Jeremiah, making a total of 49 Old Testament books in contrast with the Protestant 39-book canon.[83]"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deuterocanonical_books#Eastern_Orthodoxy

Look at this ****:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3_Maccabees#Synopsis
« Last Edit: July 24, 2020, 04:28:39 am by 90sRetroFan »