“The music that has the greatest emotional impact on me is Counterculture music.”
Are you sure it’s not because it’s what you grew up with? Because the ones I knew who thought so were born in the middle of Counterculture (who’s outlook peaked in their teens right before 9/11).
If I’m wrong then maybe it could be because music has been more prominent in pop culture than music was in ancient times (which, along with pronunciation-dependent languages, survived less than pottery, architecture, clothing, visual artwork, pronunciation-independent languages, etc), so of course there’s going to be more counterculture music to chose from.
If you actually think Counterculture was the peak of culture, go ahead. But don’t be surprised if someone later than yourself with your current ranking thought the purpose wasn’t fulfilled and finds a later music culture better than Counterculture:
But then again, I got to do some self discovery to see if I’m worthy or not. I might be. I might not be. Who knows. I have to find out. I have to know myself and my qualities, discover my passion, and if there is something in need of fulfillment, then I might use my inner qualities to fulfill it. If there is something I’m passionate about, I would contribute faithfully. If I were to create, I’d have to already have been a fan. Just to be sure, it is what you said about Eurocentrist New China:
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/issues/media-decolonization/msg26470/#msg26470The correct attitude is for you as an artist to start off subjectively as a fan of the pop culture product you yourself are producing. If even the producer is not a fan, how can the consumers be expected to become fans? Yet this is the attitude most absent in "New China". Instead, prod
And Sailor Moon vs Crystal
https://trueleft.createaforum.com/counterculture-era/the-archetype-of-the-warrior-how-films-help-empower-us-all/msg24643/#msg24643I am firmly in the camp that appreciates the original series precisely for not sticking to the comic book source material (unlike Crystal).
And from the example of legendary figures of many cultures, their cultures were deficient in quality, so it needed a hero with empathy to make it strong. That’s when they come in. But they weren’t toying with fame, honor, etc. Because the cultures didn’t provide that. They were toiling with growing their culture to what it later became. Do you think Motown provided the Jacksons with a good life and that they were in for the trends? No. The Jacksons (especially Michael) made the best of what they got and used their inner strengths. They went through the struggle so they deserve the success
Of course this is more about already existing cultures. This is not to say one should create a culture to grow it.