True Left

@Numinous

You are implying I am pedo for arguing against pedophilia, while ignoring the person outright supporting pedophilia? Okay pal

ok thnx for the heads up lmk how that goes

Massive truthbombs dropped by @Vrily in this thread, thank god someone finally stopped blindly taking whatever **** 90sRetroFan is cookin up

"sexual hedonism is antithetical to the spiritually minded nature of original nobility"

Point out what is sexual in the example video. Oh wait, you already refused to do so:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/questions-debates/re-eroticism-sexuality-2463/msg24017/#msg24017

>Point out (provide time intervals) in my example video... where Miyama is being adulterated, and explain precisely (provide as much detail as possible) which actions are adulterating and why.

Sorry kike, I am not going to timestamp for you.

"none of this looks good for you."

also nice admission of (((you))) datamining your users, bare user IPs should always be salted and or not shown at all

>Point out what is sexual in the example video. Oh wait, you already refused to do so

"If media of children is made to make them sexually tantalizing, then I do not need to provided specific timestamps in said media to prove that they are being sexualized. If you want specifics, look at that Cuties video I sent. Furthermore, you have failed to address the point that sexualization of children counter original nobility. Do you think no one notices it when you try to derail from points you cannot disprove?"

Plus by your own admission, it does not need to be full blown prnography to be sexual:


Therefore, it is an adulteration of original nobility. Considering this, it is obvious you just wanted me to timestamp for you as is common with pedos:



Therefore, I refuse to timestamp for you on the grounds that I don't need to watch your ~1H15M creepshit to debunk you, and that it was just an attempt for you to get sick satisfaction from trying to trick me into doing a humiliation ritual in a manner that provides you fap material.

>"none of this looks good for you."

???? Okay honest to God I only saw that when I checked to see if you responded. Even better, I can PROVE it was not me. Let's start with this:

• If it was a real supporter, they would come out immediately and say we're not the same person.
• I use Tor & VPN by default; these IPs are shared by a lot of people. You can post my other IP addresses I've posted with, and you'll see that they come from all over. This post, for instance, should come from a Norwegian IP.
• Any Aryanist reading this who knows me knows I'm not from the Netherlands.
• Anyone reading this can tell I am very confident in my argument right now. I don't need fake alts to self-hype (although you may). But if I were, I'd know to switch IP addresses. I have experience doing this, for instance, when you recently tried IP banning me.
• Thanks for doxxing Numinous retard.

But with the chance this is actually just 90sRF, I will say that even then I AM NOT FALLING FOR THE DISTRACTION PSYOP. Are you THIS DESPERATE? Are you so embarassed by Numinous' schizopostings that you want to make it look like I have been posting them? You are a pedofreak and you have lost the argument. Even now I DO NOT FORGET THAT YOU ARE TRYING TO DISTRACT FROM WHAT YOU CANNOT DEBUNK. ONWARDS:

>Initiated violence is problematic to Aryanists. Initiated violence is what you have admitted you want you do to people with non-violent sexual preferences that you dislike. Therefore you are problematic to Aryanists.

"This applies to LGBT and recreational sex, not pedophilia. The initiatory/retaliatory violence dichotomy is crucial, but it does not cover life's nuances. If I am "violent" for wanting to stop a kid from jumping into a pit of punji sticks and (at best) suffering lifelong physical and emotional scars because of it, then so be it.

But you are kidding yourself if you seriously believe that Aryanism does not support any initiatory violence itself. For instance, you can be non-violently racist by adhering to your tribe's clothing, food, music, culture, superstition, Et cetera by not hurting anyone or anything. But as monoculturalists, we know that even "non-violent racism" is bad in itself. Why? Because racism is still the prioritization of selfishness over honor. And in the real world, "non-violent racism" very quickly turns into tribalism and all the cruelty it entails. Just as we know that even "non-violent pedophilia" is bad in itself, as it is obscenely exploitative and easily one of the worse ways to adulterate original nobility. In the real world, your "non-violent pedophilia" quickly turns into child r@pe and human trafficking. "Plausible deniability" doesn't mean shít."

"I refuse to timestamp for you"

I know.

"I am very confident in my argument"

You are so confident in your argument that you refuse to argue.

Trump is so confident that there was election fraud against him in 2020 that he refuses to present evidence of it.

"I use Tor & VPN by default"
"I'm not from the Netherlands."

Yes, that's how VPN works.

"I don't need fake alts to self-hype"