Author Topic: Ascesis Foundation  (Read 17625 times)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
  • ascesis.a0001.net
    • View Profile
    • Ascesis
Re: Why You All Suck
« Reply #15 on: May 02, 2023, 05:51:56 pm »
>That is their fault, not mine. And their reaction only further proves my point.

Gahahhahahaha for someone who supposedly makes compassion the focus of their worldview, you certainly understand nothing about people. Are you comfortable with Backlash Herding then? Are you going to forget how raceless and malleable people are? Is that really it?

Because I can go to the same exact people you speak of, and invite them to work with their neighbors (regardless of ethnicity) to create community organizations that help facilitate Folkic celebrations and grassroots social services that brings their community together. Which method, my good friend, do you think actually reduces racial tensions?

>When do the "white" Manifest Destiny occupiers (which I what I think you mean) intend to return the land they stole? I am not even demanding that they personally emigrate. All they need to do is refrain from reproducing, and the land will cease to be inherited by their descendants. They refuse to do even this. This tells us all we need to know about them.

Many "white" people are not related to Western colonizers, do they get the Gulag too? I don't think Native people are too happy with "blacks" and "Asians" occupying their land either. Are you going to flip out when they refuse to refrain from reproducing? We all know Natalists suck, but your misanthropy has clearly made you delusional and politically useless.

>Which will prove my point about them.

No you idiot. If I were to make fun of you for being short, you'd probably end up finding a way to be proud of being short, even if its something you didn't care about before. Replace "shortness" with something actually bad, and the same affect occurs.

>If X steals from Y, then Z inherits the stolen item from X, and Z refuses to return it to Y on the grounds that Z was not the one who personally stole it, what does that tell us about Z?


This isn't even what we were talking about, you are strawmanning me with the backdrop of the random context you inserted. What do you want then, to empty America of all "white" people? To where, Europe? Return land to their ethnic Natives? Cool way to prevent ethnostates bro.

>And should we listen to someone (you) who then argues Z should not be blamed because blaming Z might lead to Z stealing even more stuff from Y?

I want Americans to recognize the ignobility the US was founded upon, and then come together to move forward and avoid those mistakes. You, on the other hand, want to crap on people for something bad that they were not responsible for, and act surprised when they choose arrogance rather than self-hatred.

>"whites" invented "black"/"brown"/"yellow"/etc. identities as well as the "white" identity.

Either all Americans drop the identity politics, or no one does. Full stop.

>I am not bolstering them. If I were, I would not be using "" around them.

I am going to call someone a piece of "shít" and then say that I didn't mean it, because I put quotes around "shít".

>It is socially acceptable for "non-whites" to be aware of who is oppressing them. As it should be.

You think "blacks" don't get screwed over people within "their own" group, or don't get help from those outside of it? Yes, "blacks" have to deal with racism and that should be addressed. But you don't seem to realize that the "blacks" being ACTUALLY oppressed like no other are the nine year olds in lithium mines, not consumerist Americans.

>Which gene pool invented electronics?


Which gene pools USE and IMPROVE them? Hint: virtually of them. Whatever happened to treating people like individuals?

>The same gene pool which invented electronics is the one actually controlling what the future will be like by its ongoing inventions

You really are doing Wignats a great service by attributing every modern invention to "whites" LOL. Besides, if you're concerned about electronics, then the demographic "gene pool" to oppose are the technocrats. And surprise! You'll find Technocrats everywhere; a marvel of human diversity if you ask me.

>Any "non-white" who still uses an identity (e.g. "black") given to them by "whites" does not yet hate "whites" enough. Encouraging hatred towards "whites" will lead to disgust towards identities invented by "whites", and hence ceasing to use them.


So you want people to hate identity politics by using identity politics to defeat identity politics? Truly a stroke of genius, I think I get it now.

This demonstrably does not work. BLM riled up quite a bit of hatred towards "whites" but did it cause "blacks" to drop their tribal consciousness? Nope, it only skyrocketed. Did it make "whites" any less racist? Nope, it only popularized racist groups.

>That is their fault, not mine. In any case, I am not addressing "whites" in the first place. I am addressing their victims.

Uhhh no. There are really no true complete living victims in the West. Everyone lives off of the suffering of animals, the devastation of the Earth, past genocides, and neocolonialism. Anything beyond that is a pissing match between people arguing who is getting screwed over less. Besides, hasn't this entire conversation been about the need to instill some good ole "white" guilt?

>I am telling their victims: there is nothing wrong with wanting to kill your oppressors. You are telling their victims: wanting to kill your oppressors might upset your oppressors.


Nope. I am saying that this is a classic case of slavemasters strategically throwing goy biscuits into a crowd to make different factions within it turn on each other, rather than charge into the bank.
« Last Edit: May 02, 2023, 05:53:28 pm by Ascesis »

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
  • ascesis.a0001.net
    • View Profile
    • Ascesis
Re: Why You All Suck
« Reply #16 on: May 02, 2023, 05:58:11 pm »
>factionalism

I'm not the one rewritting the main site boyo.

"Ascesis supports the original Aryanist ideal, as it was outlined on the main site for over a decade. If we're "factionalists" because we independently pursue success according to the original ideal, rather than allow Aryanism to fade into oblivion, then so be it. But like it or not, it takes more than a rule flatly saying "no factionalism" to prevent factionalism."

ascesis.a0001.net


>be change you want without petty arguing.


I think it'd be reasonable for you to infer that forum posting isn't our only form of action. I'm here because I care about this community, and I don't want to see it poisoned anymore. You're right though, this entire conversation is petty and stupid. But if that applies to me, then that applies to 90sRF as well. Its embarassing that Aryanism has come to this; this is why Ascesis was created.

Tyranny

  • Guest
Re: Why You All Suck
« Reply #17 on: May 02, 2023, 06:58:10 pm »
"Why You All Suck"

"I care about the members of this community..."

Whilst failing to tell us why we all suck mind you?

Cool story bro!  ??? ;D

You really believe everyone is stupid and you are some kind of genius don't you? How "white" of you!!! Rofl!

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 339
    • View Profile
Re: Why You All Suck
« Reply #18 on: May 02, 2023, 08:12:46 pm »
"Gahahhahahaha for someone who supposedly makes compassion the focus of their worldview, you certainly understand nothing about people."

"Gahahhahahaha" why should anyone have compassion for their enemies? Aryanists have compassion for the children of their enemies, that's about it...

By the way, "Gulag" is a Soviet\Communist\Jewish\Western word:
Quote
The Gulag[c][d][10][11][9] was the government agency in charge of the Soviet network of forced labour camps which were set up by order of Vladimir Lenin, reaching its peak during Joseph Stalin's rule from the 1930s to the early 1950s.[12] English-language speakers also use the word gulag in reference to each of the forced-labor camps that existed in the Soviet Union, including the camps that existed in the post-Lenin era.[13][14] The full official name of the agency changed several times.

The Gulag is recognized as a major instrument of political repression in the Soviet Union. The camps housed a wide range of convicts, from petty criminals to political prisoners, a large number of whom were convicted by simplified procedures, such as NKVD troikas or other instruments of extrajudicial punishment. In 1918–1922, the agency was administered by the Cheka, followed by the GPU (1922–1923), the OGPU (1923–1934), later known as the NKVD (1934–1946), and the Ministry of Internal Affairs (MVD) in the final years. The Solovki prison camp, the first correctional labour camp which was constructed after the revolution, was opened in 1918 and legalized by a decree, "On the creation of the forced-labor camps", on April 15, 1919...
en.wikipedia.org


Why do you find it so difficult to not be "white"?: https://trueleft.createaforum.com/colonial-era/the-'black'-and-'white'-identity-politics-scam/

"Ascesis supports the original Aryanist ideal, as it was outlined on the main site for over a decade."

Please explain the "Aryanist ideal" that you supported "decades" ago, which has somehow changed present day, or are you full of horse shyte?

BONUS SONG:

Why Reconcile?

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
  • ascesis.a0001.net
    • View Profile
    • Ascesis
Re: Why You All Suck
« Reply #19 on: May 02, 2023, 08:14:23 pm »
>"Why You All Suck"... "I care about the members of this community..."

If you think that's bad, consider how 90sRF talks to people on the regular. There's a reason why so many people have left Aryanism over the years, and that's one of them.

>Whilst failing to tell us why we all suck mind you?

Hi flake. Did you not read the FAQ? Its posted in this thread:

ascesis.a0001.net


To be fair, you would have been able to see it better if this account wasn't censored (all of my posts are redirected to this thread), but holy śhit does it speak volumes that you guys seem to love critiquing Ascesis without actually reading its material.

>You really believe everyone is stupid and you are some kind of genius don't you? How "white" of you!!! Rofl!

Do you? Because I never said that.
« Last Edit: May 02, 2023, 08:30:33 pm by Ascesis »

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
  • ascesis.a0001.net
    • View Profile
    • Ascesis
Re: Why You All Suck
« Reply #20 on: May 02, 2023, 08:22:12 pm »
>Aryanists have compassion for the children of their enemies, that's about it...

Looks like we actually agree then! My whole point is that treating the children of ignoble people like they're already evil, is going to make them actually evil.

>"Gulag" is a Soviet\Communist\Jewish\Western word

Which is why I used it a negatively :)

>Please explain the "Aryanist ideal" that you supported "decades" ago, which has somehow changed present day, or are you full of horse shyte?

Basically the fact that we went from recognizing the inherent ignobility of Backlash Herding, to joining the people inducing it. If you deny that the main site is being rewritten, then perhaps you yourself are full of horse shyte.
« Last Edit: May 03, 2023, 11:55:41 am by Ascesis »

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 364
    • View Profile
Re: Why You All Suck
« Reply #21 on: May 02, 2023, 08:32:21 pm »
I really have no dog in this fight and I’m just gonna let 90sRetroFan defend himself, but this idea that the website is being rewritten in order to change the inherent ideology, is only an assumption. From what 90sRetroFan has said about it, the website is being updated to make it more relevant to the current times and current events. The website has stayed largely the same for a long time now, so it makes sense to me. I don’t really expect anything to change about the website on an ideological level if it ends up being finished in a timely manner, because 90sRetroFan’s politics have stayed basically exactly the same over the years. They’re at the very least consistent, and I’m sure that you would concede that. And I don’t notice any discrepancies between what they currently believe, and what the pre-update articles say. At least, not any of the sort that would lead me believe that 90sRetroFan is consciously aware of those discrepancies and is choosing to bury them. I just think you’re mixing up your own interpretation with what 90sRetroFan was attempting to convey. And that’s understandable, because we all have our own interpretations about some of the little things in the main website
« Last Edit: May 02, 2023, 08:37:35 pm by SirGalahad »

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15124
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Why You All Suck
« Reply #22 on: May 02, 2023, 08:35:22 pm »
"Are you comfortable with Backlash Herding then?"

Do you even know what a Backlash Herder is?

All Tips And Guide For Your Reference
Site Title · aryanism.net


Quote
propagandists responsible for promoting attitudes such as Islamophobia, racism (implicit or explicit) towards so-called “Third World” ethnicities, and an overarching admiration of and desire to preserve Western civilization.

Duchesne is a Backlash Herder. Culture Critic is a Backlash Herder. If you dislike Backlash Herding, go after them (like I do!).

"Are you going to forget how raceless and malleable people are?"

I am not a communist. Are you?

"I can go to the same exact people you speak of, and invite them to work with their neighbors (regardless of ethnicity) to create community organizations that help facilitate Folkic celebrations and grassroots social services that brings their community together. Which method, my good friend, do you think actually reduces racial tensions?"

How does reducing tensions lead to justice? (Trump supporters said that indicting Trump would "inflame tensions". They were not incorrect. Indicting Trump also is a better path to justice than not indicting Trump.)

"Many "white" people are not related to Western colonizers, do they get the Gulag too?"

If they call themselves "white", they are volunteering to be associated with the Western colonizers.

"I don't think Native people are too happy with "blacks" and "Asians" occupying their land either."

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/ethnotribalism-the-computer-simulation/msg18545/#msg18545

Quote
Kevin Gover, Under Secretary for Museums and Culture, is “a citizen of the Pawnee Tribe of Oklahoma.”

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/issues/uniting-americans/msg69/?topicseen#msg69

Quote
Spoonhunter decided to put together the event, along with Micah Lott, as a way to “bring to light issues that we experience as people of color,” he said. He said the overwhelming response from the city, where you still regularly see Confederate flags hung in windows and in trucks, was positive. “There were people who shouted, ‘Hope you get the ‘rona,” he said. “But most people honked in support, or raised their fist, or if we shouted ‘black lives matter’ or ‘justice for Floyd,’ they would open their windows and yell it back.”

“As Indigenous people, we wanted to stand in solidarity with Black Lives,” Lott told me. “We put it on in Riverton, because of its older white conservative population and its prejudice toward Black, Indigenous, and People of Color.”

Quote
“Your fight is my fight #BlackLivesMatter,” “Racism kills. I can’t breathe” and “Justice for George Floyd” read some of the signs hoisted by the crowd.
...
“Just like our oppressions, our struggles are also linked. The anti-racist struggle in the United States is the same as that of Mexico and other parts of the world, the struggle of indigenous peoples is the same as that of blacks,” Bailey added.

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/issues/uniting-americans/msg2272/?topicseen#msg2272

Quote
What’s destructive about these takes is the unstated assumption that the country can’t heal if white Americans aren’t accommodated first.

If Biden is to truly heal a divided country, he should not coddle white racial anxieties rooted in a perceived loss of status and privilege. Policy should not be built on how it may assuage or enflame these pathologies. Americans—particularly those who are Black, Native American, Asian American, and Latino or Hispanic—have little use for policymaking that’s distracted by the threat of a racist backlash. Being a president to all Americans means not centering white grievances rooted in false notions of superiority.

"If I were to make fun of you for being short, you'd probably end up finding a way to be proud of being short, even if its something you didn't care about before. Replace "shortness" with something actually bad, and the same affect occurs."

So if someone does something actually bad, we should not disapprove of it lest they become proud of it. Your way of thinking is why there has been no accountability for:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/news/red-coup/

"This isn't even what we were talking about"

X are colonial-era "whites". Y are their victims. Z are present-day "whites". Do you know how to do substitution? If so, read this again:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/questions-debates/t1853/msg19138/#msg19138

Quote
If X steals from Y, then Z inherits the stolen item from X, and Z refuses to return it to Y on the grounds that Z was not the one who personally stole it, what does that tell us about Z?

Now answer me.

"What do you want then, to empty America of all "white" people?"

Yes.

"To where, Europe?"

You are illiterate:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/questions-debates/t1853/msg19138/#msg19138

Quote
I am not even demanding that they personally emigrate. All they need to do is refrain from reproducing, and the land will cease to be inherited by their descendants.

"Return land to their ethnic Natives? Cool way to prevent ethnostates bro."

You are illiterate. I have always supported open borders.

"I want Americans to recognize the ignobility the US was founded upon, and then come together to move forward and avoid those mistakes."

If you were serious about this, you would first demand eliminating the bloodlines that produced such behaviour.

"You, on the other hand, want to crap on people for something bad that they were not responsible for"

They are volunteering to take responsibility for it! If I join a gang today, and then am killed tomorrow in a retaliatory attack on the gang by victims that the gang victimized last month, the retaliators still did nothing wrong in killing me even though I was not among those who victimized them last month. I chose to join the gang despite knowing the gang's history, therefore I am volunteering to be associated with everything the gang has done in the past.

"and act surprised when they choose arrogance rather than self-hatred."

Does this sound like surprise to you?

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/superiority-cannot-be-taught/

"Either all Americans drop the identity politics, or no one does. Full stop."

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/ethnotribalism-the-computer-simulation/msg15977/#msg15977

You are LaCour/Levitt.

"I am going to call someone a piece of "shít" and then say that I didn't mean it, because I put quotes around "shít"."

Please link to at least one site where people are taught to be proud of their shittiness.

"lithium mines"

Who discovered lithium?

en.wikipedia.org


Quote
it was not until 1817 that Johan August Arfwedson, then working in the laboratory of the chemist Jöns Jakob Berzelius, detected the presence of a new element while analyzing petalite ore.[72][73][74][75] This element formed compounds similar to those of sodium and potassium, though its carbonate and hydroxide were less soluble in water and less alkaline.[76] Berzelius gave the alkaline material the name "lithion/lithina", from the Greek word λιθoς (transliterated as lithos, meaning "stone"), to reflect its discovery in a solid mineral, as opposed to potassium, which had been discovered in plant ashes, and sodium, which was known partly for its high abundance in animal blood. He named the metal inside the material "lithium".[7][70][75]

Arwedson later showed that this same element was present in the minerals spodumene and lepidolite.[77][70] In 1818, Christian Gmelin was the first to observe that lithium salts give a bright red color to flame.[70][78] However, both Arfwedson and Gmelin tried and failed to isolate the pure element from its salts.[70][75][79] It was not isolated until 1821, when William Thomas Brande obtained it by electrolysis of lithium oxide, a process that had previously been employed by the chemist Sir Humphry Davy to isolate the alkali metals potassium and sodium.[36][79][80][81][82] Brande also described some pure salts of lithium, such as the chloride, and, estimating that lithia (lithium oxide) contained about 55% metal, estimated the atomic weight of lithium to be around 9.8 g/mol (modern value ~6.94 g/mol).[83] In 1855, larger quantities of lithium were produced through the electrolysis of lithium chloride by Robert Bunsen and Augustus Matthiessen.[70][84] The discovery of this procedure led to commercial production of lithium in 1923 by the German company Metallgesellschaft AG, which performed an electrolysis of a liquid mixture of lithium chloride and potassium chloride.[70][85][86]

"Which gene pools USE and IMPROVE them? Hint: virtually of them."

Only after they were invented. By whom?

"Whatever happened to treating people like individuals?"

Each individual can choose to reproduce or to not reproduce. When someone with "white" parents and who knows "white" history nevertheless intends to reproduce, they reveal what kind of individual they are, and we will treat them accordingly.

"attributing every modern invention to "whites" LOL."

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/questions-debates/how-to-resign-as-a-jew/msg17926/#msg17926

"So you want people to hate identity politics by using identity politics to defeat identity politics? Truly a stroke of genius, I think I get it now."

Pacifists react similarly when I talk about Ahimsa.

"This demonstrably does not work."

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/issues/academic-decolonization/msg15836/#msg15836

"hasn't this entire conversation been about the need to instill some good ole "white" guilt?"

No, it is about instilling hatred towards "whites" by "non-whites".
« Last Edit: May 02, 2023, 08:44:20 pm by 90sRetroFan »

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
  • ascesis.a0001.net
    • View Profile
    • Ascesis
Re: Why You All Suck
« Reply #23 on: May 02, 2023, 09:52:16 pm »
>Do you even know what a Backlash Herder is?

Do you even know what Backlash Herding is? This is your own writing, if I am not mistaken:

"Can a liar already exposed as a liar continue to manipulate his victims? Yes, by advising the opposite of what he wants people to do, so that people fall into his trap by rejecting his advice. This tactic - commonly known as the reverse-bluff - has been in operation since the increase in rise of alternative media to challenge mainstream media. Those who believe they have escaped Zionist herding by turning to alternative media are behaving as if Zionists were unaware that alternative media exists. It makes more sense to consider that mainstream media and reactionary alternative media may be collaborating, with the former (whose credibility is in decline) reverse-bluffing to channel credibility to the latter, which can then easily manipulate their supposedly 'awake' viewers."

"On the issue of multiethnic society, every mainstream article written in apparent celebration of ethnic diversity in society is making its readers more racist, and this is the exact Zionist intention of such media: not to encourage unity, but to sow discord."

>How does reducing tensions lead to justice? (Trump supporters said that indicting Trump would "inflame tensions". They were not incorrect. Indicting Trump also is a better path to justice than not indicting Trump.)

There's a difference between punishing the ignoble, and doing what we can to allow help the people heal and unite.

>If they call themselves "white", they are volunteering to be associated with the Western colonizers.


Now this has got to be the most demonstrably schizophrenic part about you; you pretend as if most people who casually refer to themselves as "white" as a technical descriptor of themselves are doing so out of any political motivation, period. Virtually most people calling themselves "white" or "black" only call themselves that because that's how everyone else describes them. They haven't realized that the choice exists to begin with.

Speaking to every restaurant worker, middle school kid, or tradesman who peripherally considers himself "white" with disgust because you assume they want slavery back is only going to make them view your ideology to be just as delusional as you are

>https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/ethnotribalism-the-computer-simulation/msg18545/#msg18545

You clearly have never actually spoken to Natives before in person lol. I don't trust this rhertoric, as Liberals are infamous for worming their way into any community they can. I've seen this first hand with LGBT & BLM pretentiously stealing the spotlight from expressly pro-Palestinian events, and its unbelievably obvious what they're doing

>So if someone does something actually bad, we should not disapprove of it lest they become proud of it. Your way of thinking is why there has been no accountability for:

I'm not saying we shouldn't shame of ignoble behavior; I am saying that we shouldn't harshly shame people just for being vaguely related to those who did it, as doing so will either produce miserable groveling idiots, or arrogant pieces of śhit.

>X are colonial-era "whites". Y are their victims. Z are present-day "whites"

I am saying that I made the point if you treat "whites" like they're racist by default, they will actually become racist; you then basically accused me of defending colonizers. Its sad that you have to resort to arguing in bad faith to try to win this

Was this supposed to be your gotcha question? Because it doesn't even get us anywhere new; all this tells us is that people don't want to take responsibility for something they didn't do. You yourself know that killing, deporting, or getting every "white" to voluntarily refuse to reproduce not only is never going to happen, you will only worsen race relations for just trying.

>You are illiterate...

Do you want people to "return land to the Natives" (which presumably means leave America), or to stay in it to refuse to reproduce? Pick one.

>I have always supported open borders.

You are not going to have open borders by restricting an entire continent for an ethnic majority, or even if you are only looking to expel "only" one ethnic group. Racism would need to be very normalized to do this.

>If you were serious about this, you would first demand eliminating the bloodlines that produced such behaviour.


Where do you draw the line? Everyone is related to some horrible group of people. This really isn't even how genetics works either. People are often ignoble for purely environmental reasons, and you and I both know how common it is to find noble people of ignoble heritage, and ignoble people with commendable heritage.

>They are volunteering to take responsibility for it! If I join a gang today, and then am killed tomorrow in a retaliatory attack on the gang by victims that the gang victimized last month, the retaliators still did nothing wrong in killing me even though I was not among those who victimized them last month. I chose to join the gang despite knowing the gang's history, therefore I am volunteering to be associated with everything the gang has done in the past.

I understand that this is a metaphor, but its a bad one; your average "white" isn't in a gang. By "month", you mean "centuries". And by "gang", you mean demographics that have changed dramatically in both genetics and culture over hundreds of years.

>Does this sound like surprise to you

More bad faith. I said:

"I want Americans to recognize the ignobility the US was founded upon, and then come together to move forward and avoid those mistakes. You, on the other hand, want to crap on people for something bad that they were not responsible for, and act surprised when they choose arrogance rather than self-hatred."

Now how about you answer this, rather than try your best to convince me that I just cornered you in the argument by pretending you don't know what I meant.

>Please link to at least one site where people are taught to be proud of their shittiness.

Again with the bad faith. I am calling you out for race baiting, and you said that it doesn't count because you put quotation marks around the words "white" and "black". Hence me mocking you by saying I'm going to insult someone, but then say it doesn't count because I used quotation marks around the insult.

>Who discovered lithium?

Motherfücker who is USING Lithium?

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/c4/86/42/c486427e66bfeac82dc55a3b4abf7041.png

Again, you are attempting to ignore what I said because you can't disprove it. Which was, for the record, that:

"You think 'blacks' don't get screwed over people within 'their own' group, or don't get help from those outside of it? Yes, 'blacks' have to deal with racism and that should be addressed. But you don't seem to realize that the 'blacks' being ACTUALLY oppressed like no other are the nine year olds in lithium mines, not consumerist Americans."

If you keep on trying to derail the conversation to avoid admitting being incorrect, then I (and honestly everyone else) will consider it a concession from you.

>By whom?

...By the people who invented them. Is "whiteness" a fake social construct, and that everyone is an individual, or we going to hate categorically hate a large portion of Humanity because they vaguely look like someone who invented something centuries ago?

You think "non-whites" (such as the Chinese or Arabs) never invented anything that lead to something bad, in the ancient past or in the present? lol

>Each individual can choose to reproduce or to not reproduce. When someone with "white" parents and who knows "white" history nevertheless intends to reproduce, they reveal what kind of individual they are, and we will treat them accordingly.

Sure? But virtually every "white" couple with kids have not thought about it this deeply. So again, treat them like monsters and they'll become exactly that

>https://trueleft.createaforum.com/questions-debates/how-to-resign-as-a-jew/msg17926/#msg17926

Are you going to call for the genocide of the Han Chinese then? Because those people are quite high IQ, and have been warring for millennia.

>Pacifists react similarly when I talk about Ahimsa.


Too bad I'm not a Pacifist, and too bad we're not talking about Ahimsa. Try again.

>No, it is about instilling hatred towards "whites" by "non-whites".

Sounds kinda racist bro. Going after racist demagogues, politicians, CEOs, and bankers is one thing — but we all know how trying to pit the people against each other is going to turn out

« Last Edit: May 02, 2023, 10:14:45 pm by Ascesis »

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
  • ascesis.a0001.net
    • View Profile
    • Ascesis
Re: Why You All Suck
« Reply #24 on: May 02, 2023, 10:11:27 pm »
>this idea that the website is being rewritten in order to change the inherent ideology, is only an assumption. From what 90sRetroFan has said about it, the website is being updated to make it more relevant to the current times and current events.

I hope it is. But considering the delusional 180° 90sRF is taking Aryanism, we can only expect the worst. How vague and time consuming he's been with it doesn't help.

>because 90sRetroFan’s politics have stayed basically exactly the same over the years


It hasn't. He went from "detached justice" to "ooga booga revenge go jerk off with your enemy's blood". He went from "we are all individuals; the pan-Europeanism and pan-Africanism are fake ideas" to "wyppl bad because someone discovered Lithium in 1817". This isn't AS honestly changing his mind, its a sign of decay.

>They’re at the very least consistent, and I’m sure that you would concede that

Read the debate between us, and you'll understand why I don't.

>And I don’t notice any discrepancies between what they currently believe, and what the pre-update articles say. At least, not any of the sort that would lead me believe that 90sRetroFan is consciously aware of those discrepancies and is choosing to bury them.


If you ask me, this is why he not only decided to rewrite Aryanism, but completely wiped the doctrine off the main site. Why not just keep it up until the new material is done? I can't imagine the recruits and simple convenience Aryanism has lost because of this.
« Last Edit: May 02, 2023, 10:17:56 pm by Ascesis »

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1130
    • View Profile
Re: Why You All Suck
« Reply #25 on: May 02, 2023, 10:23:08 pm »
Quote
There's a difference between punishing the ignoble, and doing what we can to allow help the people heal and unite.

We can heal when "whites" are destroyed. We cannot heal if the "whites" let alive without punishment. We cannot trust every single "whites" anymore

Quote
I am saying that I made the point if you treat "whites" like they're racist by default, they will actually become racist; you then basically accused me of defending colonizers. Its sad that you have to resort to arguing in bad faith to try to win this

The aware "whites" will confess that they are racist by racial category and subjugate to our dominion. If they behave like what you assume, that is become racist because we criticize them, they will be our target of attack.

Quote
Speaking to every restaurant worker, middle school kid, or tradesman who peripherally considers himself "white" with disgust because you assume they want slavery back is only going to make them view your ideology to be just as delusional as you are

Being "white" means being ignorant that the word "white" is offensive, not merely glorifying the history of slavery of "colored people" by "whites". Anyone who identify themselves as "white" without feel shame and guilty must got harsh punishment like Otto Warmbier

Quote
You are not going to have open borders by restricting an entire continent for an ethnic majority, or even if you are only looking to expel "only" one ethnic group. Racism would need to be very normalized to do this.

That's the reason for enforcing anti-democratic government. To prevent the "white" majority for behaving more ignoble and more easily to be subjugated. The Hitlerian approach is the best way to do that.

Quote
..or getting every "white" to voluntarily refuse to reproduce not only is never going to happen, you will only worsen race relations for just trying.

Why should we sympathize with race who are preferable to Jews? We want to destroy them

Quote
>By whom?

...By the people who invented them. Is "whiteness" a fake social construct, and that everyone is an individual, or we going to hate categorically hate a large portion of Humanity because they vaguely look like someone who invented something centuries ago?

You think "non-whites" (such as the Chinese or Arabs) never invented anything that lead to something bad, in the ancient past or in the present? lol

"White" is this definition :

1. Pro-democracy
2. Pro-capitalist
3. Pro-progressivism
4. Pro-Judaism
5. Pro-Empiricism
6. Pro-Complexity
7. Pro-competition
8. Pro-Stoicism
9. Pro-Industrialism
10. Pro-communism
12. Pro-Relativism
13. Pro-Naturalism



Quote
As Ricardo Duchesne notes, the Indo-European legacy is key to understanding the restless, aggressive, questing, innovative, “Faustian” soul of Europe. Indo-Europeans were a “uniquely aristocratic people dominated by emerging chieftains for whom fighting to gain prestige was the all-pervading ethos. This culture [is] interpreted as ‘the Western state of nature’ and as the primordial source of Western restlessness.”[3]

On Arabs, they ever became "white" in the past which poisoned behavior of Islamic people. Because they spread "white" philosophical worldview from learning about Greece retard literature



https://trueleft.createaforum.com/ancient-world/islamic-golden-age-philosophy-and-humanities/msg18348/#msg18348

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/ancient-world/islamic-golden-age-philosophy-and-humanities/msg18978/#msg18978

Quote
Are you going to call for the genocide of the Han Chinese then? Because those people are quite high IQ, and have been warring for millennia.

If the Chinese still behave moderately to the West including Russia and preserve their retard communism, they will be another "whites". During colonial era, the Chinese usually worked together with their "white" master to extend the business and trade on the colonized people's land without sympathizing with the victim of colonialism


Quote
Sounds kinda racist bro. Going after racist demagogues, politicians, CEOs, and bankers is one thing — but we all know how trying to pit the people against each other is going to turn out

Jews also tell that we are "racist" because we incite hatred towards them. I don't take them seriously
« Last Edit: May 02, 2023, 10:42:31 pm by antihellenistic »

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
  • ascesis.a0001.net
    • View Profile
    • Ascesis
Re: Why You All Suck
« Reply #26 on: May 02, 2023, 10:39:54 pm »
>The aware "whites" will confess that they are racist by racial category and subjugate to our dominion. If they behave like what you assume, that is become racist because we criticize them, they will be our target of attack.

That's the issue — you are offering people either to be "subjugated under your dominion", or be attacked for not doing so. Both options are degrading and fail to transcend the slave identities put before us.

>"White" is this definition: Pro-democracy, pro-capitalist, pro-Progressivism, pro-Judaism, pro-Empiricism, pro-Complexity, pro-competition, pro-Stoicism, pro-Industrialism, pro-Communism, pro-Relativism, pro-Naturalism

Sounds a lot like China! Clearly you don't have to be "white" to be "white".

>On Arabs, they ever became "white" in the past which poisoned behavior of Islamic people... If the Chinese still behave moderately to the West including Russia and preserve their retard communism, they will be another "whites". During colonial era, the Chinese usually worked together with their "white" master to extend the business and trade on the colonized people's land without sympathizing with the victim of colonialism

So "whites" are the only source of evil in the world, but when other people act bad, its just because they were actually "white" all along? Don't get me wrong, Westernization certainly exists but if you think that everyone was perfectly noble until "whites" came along, you are delusional.

>Jews also tell that we are "racist" because we incite hatred towards them. I don't take them seriously

"Whites" do not have the extreme racial consciousness and inner cohesion that Jews do, so this does not apply.
« Last Edit: May 02, 2023, 10:42:11 pm by Ascesis »

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1130
    • View Profile
Re: Why You All Suck
« Reply #27 on: May 02, 2023, 10:56:23 pm »
Quote
That's the issue — you are offering people either to be "subjugated under your dominion", or be attacked for not doing so. Both options are degrading and fail to transcend the slave identities put before us.

Destroying "whites" means destroying them and people who behave like them, regardless of their racial origins. But I doubt that many so-called "blacks" succeed to behave like "whites" like other light-skinned people like "East Asians" and "Arabs" for example. The more light-skinned people are, the closer they to Yahweh's rule (Yahweh's rule mean Western Civilization, it's culture, politics, and philosophies) 

Quote
So "whites" are the only source of evil in the world, but when other people act bad, its just because they were actually "white" all along? Don't get me wrong, Westernization certainly exists but if you think that everyone was perfectly noble until "whites" came along, you are delusional.

Before "whites" rise, no one invented the complexity of material tools and applying bad and ignoble behavior into philosophical and ideological worldviews. When "white" rise, even the ignoble behavior got justified because there's "philosophical and ideological reason to do that". See how "whites"'s reproduction resulting Aristotelianism and Judaism-Christianity ideology and philosophy. The "whites" are considered "the source of evil" because they are adept at being evil, so we must expose them to make them take accountability. By the way, it was not "blacks" who invented what I already say before

Quote
"Whites" do not have the extreme racial consciousness and inner cohesion that Jews do, so this does not apply.

Even "non-whites" tend to prefer "white skin color" in advertising activity rather than using their fellows to do that. Therefore "white racial consciousness" is still alive today. If "Whites" do not have extreme racial consciousness, then there will be no "white nationalism" and the "white conservatives" will not exist anywhere on this world. And don't forget to see Israel too, they very consciously "white race"

« Last Edit: May 02, 2023, 10:58:18 pm by antihellenistic »

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15124
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Why You All Suck
« Reply #28 on: May 03, 2023, 12:08:46 am »
"This is your own writing"

This is your own illiteracy:

Quote
every mainstream article written in apparent celebration of ethnic diversity

I am not mainstream media, and I do not celebrate ethnic diversity:

"Do you even know what Backlash Herding is?"

Do you?

"Speaking to every restaurant worker, middle school kid, or tradesman who peripherally considers himself "white" with disgust because you assume they want slavery back"

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/ancient-world/marathon-the-battle-that-gave-birth-to-western-civilization/msg16801/#msg16801

Quote
as I said elsewhere, due to messy leftist messaging, there exist some sincere anti-racists who mistakenly think they have a social duty to identify as "white" in order to "acknowledge their privilege". Those who identify as "white" for this reason are not to be prematurely assumed to be "white" on account of their self-identification alone.

The most reliable way to tell whether or not apparent anti-racists who say they are "white" are actually "white", as always, is whether or not they voluntarily refrain from reproducing.

"if you treat "whites" like they're racist by default, they will actually become racist"

I do not treat individuals with "white" parents like they're racist by default, so long as they are voluntarily refraining from reproducing. Have I ever treated HikariDude like he's racist by default?

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/questions-debates/how-to-resign-as-a-jew/msg17907/#msg17907

"all this tells us is that people don't want to take responsibility for something they didn't do."

Z did not steal from Y. Z was given the stolen item by X, who stole it from Y. Should Z give back the item to Y?

If Z in response complains about having to take responsibility for something they didn't do, what does that tell us about Z?

Stop ducking the question.

"you will only worsen race relations for just trying."

You are worsening "non-white" spiritual health by telling them they should not hate their oppressors.

"Do you want people to "return land to the Natives" (which presumably means leave America), or to stay in it to refuse to reproduce?"

You are the one doing the presuming. I already said:

Quote
All they need to do is refrain from reproducing, and the land will cease to be inherited by their descendants.

"You are not going to have open borders by restricting an entire continent for an ethnic majority"

Which I never claimed to want to do.

"or even if you are only looking to expel "only" one ethnic group."

Which I explicitly said I would not be doing:

Quote
I am not even demanding that they personally emigrate.

but you are illiterate.

"Where do you draw the line? Everyone is related to some horrible group of people."

The period from the Renaissance onwards has been uniquely horrible, and only one group of people was behind it all.

"This really isn't even how genetics works either."

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/questions-debates/how-to-resign-as-a-jew/msg17926/#msg17926

"your average "white" isn't in a gang."

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/colonial-era/

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/news/ethnonepotism/

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/news/police-rightist-bias/

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/news/mainstream-media-rightist-bias/

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/news/state-subverters/

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/news/military-subverters/

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/news/crypto-lynching/

"Now how about you answer this"

I already answered you, you illiterate:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/questions-debates/t1853/msg19151/#msg19151

Quote
"You, on the other hand, want to crap on people for something bad that they were not responsible for"

They are volunteering to take responsibility for it! If I join a gang today, and then am killed tomorrow in a retaliatory attack on the gang by victims that the gang victimized last month, the retaliators still did nothing wrong in killing me even though I was not among those who victimized them last month. I chose to join the gang despite knowing the gang's history, therefore I am volunteering to be associated with everything the gang has done in the past.

Now how about you answer my XYZ questions?

"I am calling you out for race baiting, and you said that it doesn't count because you put quotation marks around the words "white" and "black". Hence me mocking you by saying I'm going to insult someone, but then say it doesn't count because I used quotation marks around the insult."

I am reacting to White Pride. Are you reacting to Shitty Pride? Hence me mocking you be demanding you link to a Shitty Pride site.

"USING Lithium?"

Only after it was discovered. By whom?

"Is "whiteness" a fake social construct, and that everyone is an individual, or we going to hate categorically hate a large portion of Humanity because they vaguely look like someone who invented something centuries ago?"

Even if no one had ever come up with the social construct of "whiteness", the distribution of machinism by ethnic background would still have looked roughly like this:



However, the social construct of "whiteness" is what convinces the high-machinism-potential gene pool that it needs to consciously preserve itself. The result of the social construct of "whiteness", therefore, is that machinism is sustainable, because the high-machinism-potential gene pool is being consciously preserved.

So, back to the present, if we end the social construct of "whiteness" but do nothing about the high-machinism-potential gene pool, it is possible that it could eventually dissipate by itself, but surely not before AI takes over machinism (whereupon it will be too late). In order to end machinism before AI takes over, we need to end the high-machinism-potential gene pool ASAP. This requires actively eliminating its bloodlines.

"You think "non-whites" (such as the Chinese or Arabs) never invented anything that lead to something bad, in the ancient past or in the present? lol"

You think if all "whites" (including Jews) had been removed from existence prior to the Renaissance, the world by now would still have AI/space travel/etc., or even any of the following?

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-is-a-health-hazard/

"virtually every "white" couple with kids have not thought about it this deeply."

That also shows what kind of individuals they are.

"So again, treat them like monsters and they'll become exactly that"

This too reveals what kind of individuals they are.

"Are you going to call for the genocide of the Han Chinese then? Because those people are quite high IQ, and have been warring for millennia."

Read the post FFS:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/questions-debates/how-to-resign-as-a-jew/msg17926/#msg17926

(Oh, I forgot: you are illiterate.)

"too bad we're not talking about Ahimsa."

Except we are talking about Ahimsa. Identitarianism is initiated violence. Do you need me to explain how?

"Sounds kinda racist bro."

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/true-left-breakthrough-anti-whiteness-476/msg16061/#msg16061

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/true-left-breakthrough-anti-whiteness-476/msg18976/#msg18976
« Last Edit: May 03, 2023, 07:40:11 pm by 90sRetroFan »

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
  • ascesis.a0001.net
    • View Profile
    • Ascesis
Re: Why You All Suck
« Reply #29 on: May 03, 2023, 11:15:54 am »
>I am not mainstream media, and I do not celebrate ethnic diversity:

We can infer that the activists bolstering such general rhetoric are complementary forces to the media. Even if you don't celebrate ethnic diversity, your politics have the same effect as those who do.

>as I said elsewhere, due to messy leftist messaging, there exist some sincere anti-racists who mistakenly think they have a social duty to identify as "white" in order to "acknowledge their privilege". Those who identify as "white" for this reason are not to be prematurely assumed to be "white" on account of their self-identification alone.

That is a different matter. Again, you are completely ignoring what I said which was:

"You pretend as if most people who casually refer to themselves as "white" as a technical descriptor of themselves are doing so out of any political motivation, period
. Virtually most people calling themselves 'white' or 'black' only call themselves that because that's how everyone else describes them. They haven't realized that the choice exists to begin with. Speaking to every restaurant worker, middle school kid, or tradesman who peripherally considers himself "white" with disgust because you assume they want slavery back is only going to make them view your ideology to be just as delusional as you are."


>The most reliable way to tell whether or not apparent anti-racists who say they are "white" are actually "white", as always, is whether or not they voluntarily refrain from reproducing.

 If by "white" you mean "racist technocratic Westerner", I would agree. But if by "white", you mean "ethnic European with beige skin" then you yourself are failing Aryanism 101. Good and bad genes exist everywhere, being what most people would call "white" doesn't mean you have ignoble genes by default.

>I do not treat individuals with "white" parents like they're racist by default, so long as they are voluntarily refraining from reproducing. Have I ever treated HikariDude like he's racist by default?

Virtually everyone with "white" parents consider themselves "white". You come along, and say they should die because you assume that means they want slavery back. Reread my quote from above.

>Stop ducking the question...


I already answered your question, just not the way you wanted me to:

"I am saying that I made the point if you treat 'whites' like they're racist by default, they will actually become racist; you then basically accused me of defending colonizers. Its sad that you have to resort to arguing in bad faith to try to win this. Was this supposed to be your gotcha question? Because it doesn't even get us anywhere new; all this tells us is that people don't want to take responsibility for something they didn't do. You yourself know that killing, deporting, or getting every 'white' to voluntarily refuse to reproduce not only is never going to happen, you will only worsen race relations for just trying."

>You are worsening "non-white" spiritual health by telling them they should not hate their oppressors.

Individual or even systemic expressions of racism against "non-whites" is one thing, but your average "white" is being screwed by the same government and corporations as "non-whites" are my guy. I'd prefer that the people storm the bank rather than their neighbors.

>Which I never claimed to want to do... Which I explicitly said I would not be doing:


Then what does "return land to the Natives" mean, exactly? Telling a massive ethnic demographic that they need to all voluntarily refuse to reproduce is functionally the same as expelling them. Again you are dodging the fact that:

"You are not going to have open borders by restricting an entire continent for an ethnic majority, or even if you are only looking to expel 'only' one ethnic group. Racism would need to be very normalized to do this."


>but you are illiterate.


hahahaha I really must be getting under your skin. This isn't even illiteracy, you were ambiguously implying that you want to "return land to the Natives" by both expulsion and make "whites" not reproduce. Yes, you can argue that they eventually mean the same thing but when people say "return land to the Natives", that typically means expulsion.

Do you realize what a Jew you look like with all these semantic acrobatics?

>The period from the Renaissance onwards has been uniquely horrible, and only one group of people was behind it all.

I agree; the technocrats. Like it or not, the vast majority of people behind the Kaczynskiite anti-tech movement are what you would call "white".

>https://trueleft.createaforum.com/colonial-era/

Quit trying to dodge the question:

"I understand that this is a metaphor, but its a bad one; your average 'white' isn't in a gang. By 'month', you mean 'centuries'. And by 'gang', you mean demographics that have changed dramatically in both genetics and culture over hundreds of years."

Answer this, or shut up.

>I already answered you

No you did not. You ignored the question by overfocusing on one word, as usual. More bad faith. I said:

"I want Americans to recognize the ignobility the US was founded upon, and then come together to move forward and avoid those mistakes. You, on the other hand, want to crap on people for something bad that they were not responsible for, and act surprised when they choose arrogance rather than self-hatred."

Now answer this, rather than try your best to convince me that I just cornered you in the argument by pretending you don't know what I meant.

>They are volunteering to take responsibility for it! If I join a gang today, and then am killed tomorrow in a retaliatory attack on the gang by victims that the gang victimized last month, the retaliators still did nothing wrong in killing me even though I was not among those who victimized them last month. I chose to join the gang despite knowing the gang's history, therefore I am volunteering to be associated with everything the gang has done in the past.[/quote]


So that's your solution? Continuous, endless gang/tribal warfare?

>I am reacting to White Pride. Are you reacting to Shitty Pride? Hence me mocking you be demanding you link to a Shitty Pride site.

Again. You cannot address my points, you have lost the conversation. So now you are being a Jew by trying to derail the debate by overfocusing on semantics. Cope harder.

>Only after it was discovered. By whom?


I have already answered this, just not in the way you want me to:

"(Lithium/Electronic was invented)...By the people who invented them. Is 'whiteness' a fake social construct, and that everyone is an individual, or we going to hate categorically hate a large portion of Humanity because they vaguely look like someone who invented something centuries ago? You think "non-whites" (such as the Chinese or Arabs) never invented anything that lead to something bad, in the ancient past or in the present? lol"

Again, you are attempting to ignore what I said because you can't disprove it. Which was, for the record, that:

"You think 'blacks' don't get screwed over people within 'their own' group, or don't get help from those outside of it? Yes, 'blacks' have to deal with racism and that should be addressed. But you don't seem to realize that the 'blacks' being ACTUALLY oppressed like no other are the nine year olds in lithium mines, not consumerist Americans."


I already told you that if you keep on trying to dodge the question, I'll take that as a concession. I'll consider this one a win. ;)

>if we end the social construct of "whiteness" but do nothing about the high-machinism-potential gene pool, it is possible that it could eventually dissipate by itself,

It won't. Look at the Chinese, South Koreans, Japanese, Gulf Arab states, and literally any "non-white" country with any measure of industrialism. They are all addicted to technocracy and consumerism. Blame it on the eight year olds with beige skin all you want, its not their fault, and its not going to change this fact.

>You think if all "whites" (including Jews) had been removed from existence prior to the Renaissance, the world by now would still have AI/space travel/etc., or even any of the following?

Is the issue with "whites", or technocrats? Again, this argument falls flat when you consider how most the anti-tech movement is comprised mostly of people who you would call "white".

>That also shows what kind of individuals they are.

No dude this shows how most "sheep", "lemming", "cattle", raceless people in general are. Again, I'll state that most of these people don't even have to be enemies:

"I can go to the same exact people you speak of, and invite them to work with their neighbors (regardless of ethnicity) to create community organizations that help facilitate Folkic celebrations and grassroots social services that brings their community together. Which method, my good friend, do you think actually reduces racial tensions?"

>This too reveals what kind of individuals they are.

Yes, we have already established years ago that the "common man" reacts to things poorly. But are we going to misanthropically whine about how bad that is, or make the best of it?

>Read the post FFS...

I did read your empirical study, actually, and my point still stands that the Han Chinese have been both historically violent and technologically innovative for millennia. Are you going to genocide them too?

Oh, I forgot: you are illiterate.

Try a different angle, calling me "illiterate" a bunch isn't going to make it any less false. Calling me "senpai" would probably stick better, if you want to try that out

>Except we are talking about Ahimsa. Identitarianism is initiated violence. Do you need me to explain how?

So your reaction is to pit one end of the identitiarianism against the other? Awesome way to end identity politics. Again I will point out that BLM tried this and it only made people more racist. Considering their vast influence, they have done shocking little to help people in general "black" people as most of their money goes to the Democratic Party when not to luxury mansions in "white" HOA neighborhoods.

>https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/true-left-breakthrough-anti-whiteness-476/msg16061/#msg16061

My issue isn't dismantling the "white" (and "black") identity, or attacking downright Western racists. My issue is categorically oppressing a group of people for having a certain skin color.
« Last Edit: May 03, 2023, 11:37:54 am by Ascesis »