Author Topic: Homo Hubris  (Read 3213 times)


  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7384
    • View Profile
Re: Homo Hubris
« on: March 24, 2021, 12:25:03 am »

Recently you may have heard of this incident:

A columbia university student just went on a drunken racist tirade shouting how whites built modern civilization. Of course, WN groups are claiming that this is not racist because he is merely "stating the facts". Any thoughts?


According to von Abele, his videotaped tirade was simply a plea for all races and cultures to openly appreciate their people’s accomplishments. “I believe that every single person should love themselves and love their culture, and we should all be allowed to be proud of our heritage,” he said.

There exist racist cultures. Therefore, if every single person should love their culture, there will exist some people who love racism.

There exist racist heritages. Therefore, if every single person should be allowed to be proud of their heritage, there will exist some people allowed to be proud of racism.

As for whether von Abele individually is racist, the answer can be found by considering: is the particular culture/heritage which he loves racist?

"**** yeah, white people. **** yeah, white men."

If it were not, it would never even have come up with the notion of "whiteness".

Therefore von Abele is racist. QED

"Look, I don’t hate other people, I just love white men."

I hate von Abele and all like him, and I would be ashamed of myself if I did not.

"I was theatrically and sarcastically demonstrating that whites are not allowed to embrace their cultural achievements"

Why should they be? Should Jews be allowed to embrace Jewish cultural achievements? Should people who experiment on animals be allowed to embrace their research achievements?çois_Magendie_(1783–1855)

Magendie was a physiologist at the Académie Royale de Médecine in France, established in the first half of the 19th century.[15] Magendie made several groundbreaking medical discoveries, but was far more aggressive than some of his other contemporaries with his use of animal experimentation. For example, the discovery of the different functionalities of dorsal and ventral spinal nerve roots was achieved by both Magendie, as well as a Scottish anatomist named Charles Bell. Bell used an unconscious rabbit because of "the protracted cruelty of the dissection", which caused him to miss that the dorsal roots were also responsible for sensory information. Magendie, on the other hand, used conscious, six-week-old puppies for his own experiments.[15][16] While Magendie's approach was more of an infringement on what we would today call animal rights, both Bell and Magendie used the same justification for vivisection: the cost of animal lives and experimentation was well worth it for the benefit of humanity.[16]

Many viewed Magendie's work as cruel and unnecessarily torturous. One note is that Magendie carried out many of his experiments before the advent of anesthesia, but even after ether's discovery it was not used in any of his experiments or classes.[15] Even during the period before anesthesia, other physiologists expressed their disgust with how he conducted his work. One such visiting American physiologist describes the animals as "victims" and the apparent sadism that Magendie displayed when teaching his classes.

Speaking of which, who introduced experimentation on animals as a method of research in the first place?

"**** yeah, white people. **** yeah, white men."


The history of animal testing goes back to the writings of the Ancient Greeks in the 4th and 3rd centuries BCE, with Aristotle (384–322 BCE) and Erasistratus (304–258 BCE) one of the first documented to perform experiments on animals.[1]
In his unfinished 1627 utopian novel, New Atlantis, scientist and philosopher Francis Bacon proposed a research center containing "parks and enclosures of all sorts of beasts and birds which we use ... for dissections and trials; that thereby we may take light what may be wrought upon the body of man."
the dramatic "Experiment 41," which demonstrated the reliance of living creatures on the air for their survival. Boyle conducted numerous trials during which he placed a large variety of different animals, including birds, mice, eels, snails and flies, in the vessel of the pump and studied their reactions as the air was removed.[5] Here, he describes an injured lark:
…the Bird for a while appear'd lively enough; but upon a greater Exsuction of the Air, she began manifestly to droop and appear sick, and very soon after was taken with as violent and irregular Convulsions, as are wont to be observ'd in Poultry, when their heads are wrung off: For the Bird threw her self over and over two or three times, and dyed with her Breast upward, her Head downwards, and her Neck awry.[6]

(I strongly encourage reading the whole page.)

The Western idea of utopia implies unlimited experimentation on non-humans.

“We invented science and industry and you want to tell us to stop because, ‘Oh my God, we’re so bad!’”

Yes, you did. Yes, I do. Yes, you are.

"**** yeah, white people. **** yeah, white men."



Another one:

A man told customers that ‘white men created civilisation’ and ‘England is f***ed because it’s run by women and immigrants’ during a racist rant at McDonald’s.

The middle-aged man can be heard in the clip telling staff at the fast food chain on Brixton Road in London: ‘This place is run by bloody immigrants’.

After noticing a man filming his monologue, he tells the crowd waiting for their orders: ‘You feminist, weak, hairy-faced, “mangina”, soy boys… cut your balls off… you’re letting women run the world, shame upon you all.
The unnamed man refers to Mr Parvenu, who calls himself a ‘black bohemian’ on Twitter, as ‘bruv’ in the video and tells him: ‘The world is built by white men. You don’t like it, do you?’. The man goes on: ‘The entire civilisation was created by white men, white men created the world for you people.’

It's disturbing to think how WN never really took off in popularity until it incorporated misogyny into its ideology. And there used to be some desperate thinkers who thought promoting misogyny could end racism by leading to unification among men. I warned them that promoting misogyny would just make racism many times worse than it already was. They went ahead and did it anyway. Guess who was correct.....

The above is your creation, imbeciles, and now you have lost control over what you created.


It seems like every other day I read about random people being outed as closet WNs.

Although, funnily enough, the WN in question is Jewish!


"Although, funnily enough, the WN in question is Jewish!"

No surprises, as usual.

a resident radiologist at Montefiore Medical Center’s Moses Campus in the Bronx.

A radiologist. Think about that for a moment. How many "non-whites" might he have given cancer to over the years by deliberately scanning them slightly longer?

“The West has no use for [Muslims], and they’ll be just fine when they go home,” he wrote.

Let us thank him for demonstrating Western thinking: only people with exploitative value to the West have reason be allowed to live in Western countries. And even then, Western countries are not their home, even if they are born there.

“If we take the birth of a non-white in isolation from context, that birth isn’t inherently a tragedy to the white race … [my] point is the principle that the loss of a white child is far worse than the birth of a non-white, at least in theory,” Bechhofer wrote in another.

This is accurate analysis. If the "non-white" birth rate had been lower 600 years ago, world history would not have been too different. If the "white" birth rate had been lower 600 years ago, the colonial era might never have happened. Of course, what is worse in Bechhofer's eyes is better in our eyes.

In another post attributed to “Dov,” the doctor wrote, ” … Do I despise Blacks like [Colin] Kaepernick for milking the White cow despite the fact that he, his race, and all others are already in such objective debt to Whites? Absolutely.”

There is nothing objective about it. Only rightist "non-whites" feel indebted to "whites". Leftist "non-whites" do not. Kaepernick clearly belongs in the latter category:


Tucker Carlson’s racist remarks:

This commenter gets it:

Yes white people are responsible for the industrial revolution and the impending collapse of the biosphere as a result of the industrial revolution.


We should invite people like that over here.


“semiliterate primitive monkey.”

To be clear, if you are offended by being called a monkey, you have already been Westernized. The truth (which is so obvious that it shouldn't even need to be stated) is that monkeys have done almost infinitely less evil in the world than humans.

“culture where people just don’t use toilet paper or forks.”

“extremely primitive.”

Biologically, women are on average more neotenous than men. If Carlson is using "primitive" to mean underdeveloped, he would be correct. But if "primitive" means less evolved, then it would be men (who failed to become as neotenous as women on average) who are more "primitive". One thing is for sure:

Which is, of course, not to say that men in general are the problem:

See also: