Author Topic: Homo Hubris  (Read 526 times)

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2852
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Homo Hubris
« on: July 19, 2020, 04:08:19 am »
(Old content will be reposted at a later date.)

Our enemy Duchesne has compiled all his Homo Hubris tweets into a single article:

https://www.eurocanadian.ca/2020/07/white-men-responsible-for-almost-all-greatest-achievements.html

Quote
The biggest reason why Whites are believed to be racist is that they are far the greatest achievers in human history and they created the nations non-whites crave to inhabit. The very existence of White Men goes against the principle of equality since they are responsible for almost 100% of the greatest achievements in all the fields of human endeavor since ancient historical times. This is a big reason why White nations are earmarked for total race mixing, and why White Males are the most resented group.

The following lists come directly from tweets I wrote over the last few months. These tweets are based on careful documentation and extensive research. One of the reasons I was suspended from twitter is that hundreds of complaints were regularly sent against me for speaking about the unique greatness of White men.

These lists (and some exaggerate a bit, for the sake of argument) will show that White men are responsible for almost everything that is noble, beautiful, and excellent in history, far surpassing the achievements of all the other races combined. The sheer fact that White men came up with all the disciplinary fields taught in our universities speaks volumes: archaeology, botany, economics, sociology, anthropology, history, biology, chemistry, genetics, physics, medicine, literature, theology, architecture...all of them.

The greatest painters, novelists, historians, biologists, physicists, classical composers, poets, car designers, mathematicians, architects are White men. White men were the greatest nation builders in history. They discovered and mapped the entire earth, every river, mountain, sea, desert -- including every territory inhabited  by non-whites.

"Greatest" according to Western standards only. Reject Western standards and suddenly everything Duchesne boasts about becomes indictment against Western civilization. One thing we can be sure about is that if the "white" men praised by Duchesne had been magically erased from existence before the Renaissance, the world could have been spared not only the entirety of the violence of the colonial era but also almost all of the macro-scale problems we currently face:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-sustainable-evil/

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-is-a-health-hazard/

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/if-western-civilization-does-not-die-soon/

(not to mention the ugliest aesthetics the world has ever seen:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-is-ugly-48/ )

So no, we do not see equality either. We see obvious Western inferiority. Nothing invented by Western civilization was invented with the prior consent of the rest of the world which is nevertheless forced to live with its consequences ever after whether we like it or not (and try to alleviate the suffering and clean up the mess they have caused as best we can). Yet Western civilization did not care in the slightest about this permanent violence any more than it cared about all the other violence it did over the last 500 years. This is part of what makes Western civilization uniquely inferior.
« Last Edit: July 19, 2020, 04:13:07 am by 90sRetroFan »

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter


90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2852
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Homo Hubris
« Reply #1 on: February 11, 2021, 12:27:40 am »
Right on schedule, our enemies rush to praise Brady:

https://www.eurocanadian.ca/2021/02/the-greatest-of-all-time.html

Quote
On Sunday night, I found myself at a local Super Bowl party. I went for the food, drinks, and camaraderie. I barely watched the television, usually getting sidelined into a conversation about the election, work, kids, etc. Still, I wanted Tom Brady to win. At one point, a Kansas City Chiefs fan complained loudly that the refs were “giving Brady the trophy” after a penalty call went in his favor. I watched the replay. It was a good call (defensive holding). As a few others and I defended the call, the KC fan – a White guy in a Mahomes jersey – sneered, “It’s because Brady is White.” Since it was neither my friend nor my party, I disengaged and went back to chatting about whatever over scotch.

But I agree – Tom Brady was getting the calls from the referees because he is White, but not for the same reasons the KC cuck lamented.
...
Pocket passers are field generals in every way. They are directing the team. They are watching the refs, defenders, players, coaches, and fans. The amount of cerebral capacity it takes to process so much stimuli in so short a period of time is astounding. They are applying the hours they studied of film and game plans to matters occurring in real time, within seconds. It also takes extraordinary restraint. You must process, analyze, interpret, and execute in seconds while trusting that the men coming to crush you will be stopped by the five men in front of you. In short, the ideal pocket passing quarterback is intelligent, studious, disciplined, and athletic.

In other words, the ideal pocket passing quarterback is White.

...
Thus, going back to the reason that Tom Brady has emerged as the Greatest of All Time – with seven super bowl rings, ten super bowl appearances, and a smoking hot wife – has everything to do with his race. The KC cuck was not wrong. The refs were giving preferential calls to Brady because he is White. But they were not doing so out of some silly systemic racism myth. They were doing so because Tom Brady, the White pocket passing quarterback, enjoys the intelligence, capacity, discipline, and athleticism to make them give him those calls. Tom Brady is capable of thinking and acting at the same time.

Consequently, Tom Brady’s career is the epitome of White Privilege – as in, he is privileged to be White.

Congratulations Tom!

In the old days, I used to counter rightist assertions that "white privilege does not exist" simply by asking the asserters whether they would not mind themselves magically being transformed into "non-white" if they could keep all their individual talents. Not one of them was ever willing to say they would not mind this, thereby undermining their own assertion. I guess this line of attack had an impact, as they now simply admit it.

Lastly, "smoking hot wife"?



How long before our enemies realize the joke is on them every time they make such statements? Because all we need to do in response is post a picture!
« Last Edit: February 11, 2021, 12:29:20 am by 90sRetroFan »

rp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 637
    • View Profile
Re: Homo Hubris
« Reply #2 on: February 11, 2021, 10:19:26 pm »
Tom Brady bailed out by refs: Super Bowl 55 rigged?:
https://youtu.be/8nLraMI5Au8

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2852
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Homo Hubris
« Reply #3 on: February 14, 2021, 11:59:44 pm »
Every time I read an enemy article like this one, I better appreciate just how apt the name "Homo Hubris" is to describe them:

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2021/02/14/a-few-great-often-forgotten-white-moments/

Quote
My goal is to entertain as well as enlighten the reader with a few not-as-well known, or so-well-known but taken-for-granted inventions, happenings, and ideas, and a modicum of names of White people who deserve to be listed in the pantheon of The Great Whites. Let us begin.
...
Arthur Scherbius
...
In 1918, he founded the firm of Scherbius & Ritter. He made a number of inventions, for example, asynchronous motors, electric pillows and ceramic heating parts; his research contributions led to his name being associated with the Scherbius principle for asynchrous motors. He applied for a patent in February 1918 for a cipher machine based on rotating wired wheels, what is now known as a rotor machine.
...
Scherbius’ Enigma provided the German Army with the strongest cryptographic cipher in the world at the time, until the code was broken by Polish mathematicians in the 1930s, as discussed in the following section.

Marian Rejewski, Henryk Zygalski and Jerzy Rozycki
...
Rejewski together with Henryk Zygalski and Jerzy Rozycki managed to build an Enigma double. They developed numerous techniques for defeating the plugboard and get all the components of the keys, thus making it possible for them to read all the German enciphered messages from 1933 to 1939.
...
Since the Germans were convinced that their technology could not be deciphered, they continued using the machine for different types of communications with their secret services, in the sky, and on the battlefield. The decoded messages were given to a few commanders who used it cautiously making sure that the Germans did not find out that their cipher was broken.

To a non-Homo Hubris mind, the conclusion is that it would have been better for the cipher machine not to have been invented in the first place. But Homo Hubris, in contrast, celebrates both the invention and the counter-invention.

Quote
Claude Shannon
...
In a 1939 letter to his mentor at Bell Laboratories, Vannevar Bush, Shannon outlined some of his initial ideas on “fundamental properties of general systems for the transmission of intelligence.”
...
Shannon’s theories have now become the standard framework underlying all modern-day communication systems: optical, underwater, even interplanetary.

His theories laid the groundwork for the electronic communications networks that now lace the earth.
...
His later work on chess-playing machines and an electronic mouse that could run a maze helped create the field of artificial intelligence

I know:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/if-western-civilization-does-not-die-soon/

Quote
Oscar H. Banker
...
Oscar H. Banker (b. Asatour Sarafian, May 31, 1895) was an Armenian-American inventor who patented a number of works, including an automatic transmission and power steering for automobiles. He is considered the “father of the automatic transmission.”

Which significantly increased use of cars.....

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-is-a-health-hazard/

Quote
The Columbian Exposition of 1893

The World’s Columbian Exposition celebrated the 400th anniversary of Christopher Columbus’s discovery of America. (Or as Wikipedia says, Columbus’s arrival in the new world.)
...
Fredrick Law Olmsted, possibly the world’s foremost landscape architect, laid out the plan to build on a swamp requiring wood pilings driven into the ground to support the buildings. He also created a system of lagoons and lakes in which full size replicas of Columbus’ ships, the Niña, the Pinta, and the Santa Maria floated. 40,000 skilled and unskilled laborers (making ten cents a day) constructed the fair’s buildings.

There were over 65,000 exhibits at the fair covering 630 acres. The Chicago skyline was dominated by a 250-foot-high Ferris wheel, designed for the fair by inventor George Ferris. It was 100 feet taller than today’s Ferris wheel at Chicago’s Navy Pier and had 36 cars capable of holding 60 people each. Fully loaded, it could carry 2,160 people and took a full twenty minutes to make one rotation.
...
The main entryway was a peristyle of forty-eight massive fluted columns on either side of an arch in the style of the Arc de Triompe.

Every US state built an exhibition house or building to show its products. California had, among other things, a full-size medieval knight on a horse made of prunes. Missouri showcased a replica of the Statue of Liberty made of sugar. Philadelphia sent the Liberty Bell to grace Pennsylvania’s building.

This was the first Fair to solicit exhibits from foreign countries and forty-six heeded the call. It seemed that each nation was in a fierce competition to excel the others. France built a nearly full-size wing of the Palace of Versailles.

On October 9, 1893, nearly a million people paid 50 cents to attend the opening where President Grover Cleveland pushed a solid gold button to switch on George Westinghouse’s electric lights that illuminated in a bath of brilliant whiteness the staff-laden buildings of the Fair. Nearly half of the total population of the US attended the Fair.

It is impossible to describe the awesome accomplishment of the White men and women who came together to create one of the wonders of the modern world. Everything about it was the biggest, the best, the greatest. It had the longest telescope in the world, the largest building in the world, and a choir of 2,500 singers.
...
Like George Ferris who was not content to allow the erector-set appearing Eifel Tower to stand as the crowning glory of civilization, there were others who motivated by money, fame, or ego, would scale mountains of obstacles, and leave their indelible record in the history books and in their genes for future generations.

You might also feel a bit wistful if not melancholy as you contemplate that White people descended to the deepest part of the oceans, climbed the highest land masses, and flew to the moon to go for a walk.

Can we ever attain the impossible tasks again? Or have we lost that intangible component, that antecedent of accomplishment, that precursor of victory, and that faculty of deliberative striving?

My worry is that they haven't lost it. And I don't recommend taking the risk to find out. The above paragraphs describe very well what Western civilization is all about. Hasn't the world had far more than enough of their **** already?

WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
« Last Edit: February 15, 2021, 12:01:24 am by 90sRetroFan »

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2852
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Homo Hubris
« Reply #4 on: February 18, 2021, 11:26:32 pm »
Our enemies can never write enough of these articles; do they realize that each such article further lowers our opinion of them?

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2021/02/18/the-pale-male-paradox-how-white-men-achieve-most-and-are-vilified-worst/

Quote
It’s one of the most interesting, enlightening and eye-opening books I’ve ever read: Simon Winchester’s Exactly: How Precision Engineers Created the Modern World (2018). Winchester tells a story of astonishing ingenuity, intelligence and effort from the steam-engine (44) to the “extreme ultraviolet” laser (296). And it’s almost exclusively a story of stale pale males—of White men from northwestern Europe.
...
slavery was neither necessary nor sufficient for the rise of Britain as an industrial and technological giant. Black slaves effectively played the role of horses and oxen: their muscles powered mechanisms and economic systems created by White ingenuity and foresight, but Blacks had no intellectual or creative role in what they powered.
...
White men have achieved most in all manner of fields, from engineering and mathematics to exploration and mountaineering. But they are also the most vilified group on earth and are held responsible for all manner of evils, from slavery and pollution to systemic racism and police brutality. Why does the highest-achieving group also receive the greatest opprobrium?

Because we never gave consent for you to modernize the world that all of us live in! But in typical Western disregard for seeking prior consent you did it anyway, thereby forcing the rest of us to live in this modern world that you created whether we like it or not.

Quote
I hadn’t heard of Maudslay and his “formidable skill in delicate engineering” (p. 54) before I read Exactly. Unlike George Floyd, Maudslay exerted himself to defeat crime, not to commit it. He helped perfect the effectively unbeatable locks of his mentor Joseph Bramah (1748–1814). He then went on, in Simon Winchester’s words, “to become the founding father of precision toolmaking, mass production, and the key engineering concept of perfect flatness.” (p. 62) Among much else, he invented a lathe that could “efficiently, precisely and [quickly]” make something that contributed far more to Britain’s wealth than “centuries of African enslavement.”

What was the something? It was “that most essential component of the industrialized world, the screw.” (p. 63) Henry Maudslay, unlike George Floyd, helped hold the Western civilization together — and literally so. In a sane world, his story would embolden Whites to say “Screw you!” to inane and self-righteous anti-White groups like Black Lives Matter.

We have been building everything we needed in daily life for thousands of years without ever requiring screws. So in the eyes of all of us who oppose industrialization (which is an ongoing macro-scale crime against the entire planet that daily dwarfs anything Floyd could possibly have done), it follows that the screw is to blame, and hence its inventor is to blame. So no, screw Maudslay!

Quote
Nor did we hear about a Swedish engineer who contributed immensely to perhaps the most important part of precision: measurement. But Winchester points out that the Swedish engineer has been unjustly forgotten for a long time: “Carl Edvard Johansson died in 1943, respected and beloved in Sweden, and forgotten elsewhere.” Johansson (1864–1943) invented measuring instruments known as gauge blocks or Jo blocks, which come in varying sizes and can be fitted together to measure, for example, “any of the 1000 lengths from 3.000 to 3.999 mm in 0.001 mm steps.” Winchester writes that Jo blocks are “machined with such precision that there [are] no asperities whatsoever on their surfaces that might allow air to get between and form a point of weakness. They [are] so perfectly flat that the molecules of their faces [bond] with one another when they [are] joined [and it becomes] impossible to break them apart. … They can only be slid apart.” (p. 3)

Winchester adds that scientists still don’t fully understand the physical mechanism behind the bonding of Jo blocks. In a sense, White ingenuity is still defeating White ingenuity: Johansson’s measuring blocks created a mystery.

Whatever turns you on.

Seriously, again we had been doing fine for thousands of years without needing this type of measuring. so why do you expect us to be impressed with gauge blocks? They are nothing but another accomplice in industrialization, the negative consequences of which are manifold and inescapable:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-is-a-health-hazard/

Quote
they direct themselves outwards, creating ingenious and awesome machines, scaling the earth’s heights, plumbing the ocean’s depths, and landing in person or by proxy on the Moon, Mars and Venus.
...
So is it ironic that Kehinde Andrews and countless other anti-White ideologues go through life relying absolutely on White male invention and ingenuity without acknowledging the debt they owe, let alone expressing any gratitude?

We are forced to use your machines in reaction to you using the same machines, to prevent you gaining too great an advantage over us. This does not mean we enjoy using your machines. We would prefer they were never invented. So why should we feel indebted to you, let alone grateful?

Quote
No, I don’t think it is. I think it’s entirely predictable. One could hardly expect Kehinde Andrews to admit that merely one tiny White group like the Swedes have contributed more to science and technology than all Blacks who ever lived.

Indeed, the single Swedish male Carl Edvard Johansson contributed more to science and technology than all Blacks who ever lived.

Yes, and that is what makes Swedish engineers, not least Johansson, accomplices to industrialization and hence villains of world history.

By the way, Kehinde Andrews is the same person whom I recently posted about here:

http://aryanism.net/blog/other/when-history-is-written-by-leftists/

Quote
The culture of critique is already proclaiming that Black women “played a crucial part” in the Moon Landings and the creation of GPS, the global positioning system whose genuine White male creators are described in Winchester’s book.

Proud Black wimminz in, hate-filled honkies out

As Black women are written into the history of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics), White men will be written out. Our hostile elite aren’t really following the script of Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949), but they might as well be: “In his own schooldays, Winston remembered, in the late fifties, it was only the helicopter that the Party claimed to have invented; a dozen years later, when Julia was at school, it was already claiming the aeroplane; one generation more, and it would be claiming the steam engine.”

The steam engine, the aeroplane and the helicopter are all products of White male genius. The parasitic Party had already claimed two of them for its own in Orwell’s novel. In our reality, the parasitic culture of critique is beginning to assign the products of White male genius to Black women.

This is a False Left manouevre which as a True Leftist I have denounced over and over again. Any "non-whites" who wish they had invented any modern machines are in spirit no better than the machines' actual inventors, as they are in effect wishing they had contributed to industrialization. They too are Westerners, and hence our enemies. Nevertheless, this problem too could have been avoided if only the machines in question were themselves never invented in the first place! Most fundamentally to blame are still the actual inventors.
« Last Edit: February 18, 2021, 11:45:42 pm by 90sRetroFan »

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2852
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Homo Hubris
« Reply #5 on: March 17, 2021, 11:30:11 pm »
As I keep saying, the fastest way to understand someone's value system is to look at which words they use to insult those whom they dislike. The following should leave us in no doubt that Homo Hubris is the perfect name for our enemies:

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2021/03/17/mediocre-meghan-as-microcosm-how-meghan-markle-symbolizes-black-hatred-of-white-civilization/

Quote
Meghan Markle was a mediocre actress of mediocre intellect with mediocre looks. She snagged a surplus prince and won herself a spectacular wedding, hijacking great White architecture and ritual with Black narcissism, crudity and entitlement.

Reminder: one day we must cover Buckingham Palace in the 'Western civilization is UGLY' topic.

Oh, what the heck, here is a quick link for now (a Westerner wrote the page title, obviously):

https://www.askideas.com/31-very-beautiful-inside-pictures-of-the-buckingham-palace-london/

Quote
You could also hear mediocre Black narcissists around the world rushing to their keyboards to type passionate defences of Markle.
...
Mos-Shogbamimu went on to explain that “As a Black woman, I am so used to all the nuances of racism that vary from person to person. There is obvious racism, but there is also a more subtle form of racism, which can best be described as a form of white violence.” When racism becomes “more subtle,” it presumably doesn’t involve physical attacks. So how can “more subtle” racism be “best described” as “white violence”? Very easily, to the mediocre intellect of Mos-Shogbamimu.

That our enemies think only physical attacks count as violence reveals their total lack of honour.

Quote
Like Oprah Winfrey and Meghan Markle, Mos-Shogbamimu is a mediocre Black facing the grandeur and tradition of a great White institution.
...
the Monarchy remains a potent symbol of White Christian Britain and is still hated by those who want to destroy Britain and its traditions. Those who can’t create often wish to forget their inferiority by destroying what others have created.

No, we want to destroy what you have created because what you have created is inferior.

Quote
The mediocre Black historian David Olusoga has done exactly that.
...
And so, after Meghan Markle attacked the Royal Family, Olusoga joined the hysteria in (where else?) the Guardian and announced that the interview with Oprah Winfrey “is not just a crisis for the royal family — but for Britain itself.” Yes, that’s how serious it is when a mediocre Black actress claims that an unspecified royal had enquired, in unspecified terms and an unspecified context, about the possible future skin-colour of her semi-Black embryo.
...
Black mediocrities side with Black barbarism rather than White civilization.
...
Oprah and Obama, united in mediocrity
...
his fellow mediocre Black, the Guardian journalist Afua Hirsch, extolled his “candour and courage.”

How is it that mediocre Blacks like Markle, Olusoga, Hirsch and Mos-Shogbamimu wield such power and influence in modern Western societies? How did a mediocre Black like Oprah Winfrey become a billionaire and a mediocre Black like Barack Obama become President of the United States?
...
That’s why Morgan still has a place in the mainstream media. He’s pro-Jewish, even if he’s prepared to criticize a self-proclaimed Black victim like Meghan Markle. But he didn’t discuss Black narcissism, mediocrity and hatred of White civilization, which are still taboo subjects in the mainstream.
...
Oprah Winfrey and Meghan Markle may be mediocre in intellect, but they and countless other non-Whites have proved quite capable of learning and applying the central message of the culture of critique: White racism explains all White success and all non-White failure.
...
It’s a simple message for simple minds and it will destroy the West unless it is firmly and irreversibly defeated by the truth. Whites are not the world’s greatest villains, but the world’s greatest creators. And they have a right to live in their own nations free of envious and hate-filled Black mediocrities like Meghan Markle and David Olusoga.

No, you are the world's greatest villains BECAUSE you are the world's greatest creators:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-sustainable-evil/

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-is-a-health-hazard/

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-is-ugly-48/

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/if-western-civilization-does-not-die-soon/

It is precisely the Western fear of mediocrity that has motivated Western civilization's transformation of the world (done without the consent of everyone else, in other words violently) into the monstrosity of complexity that it has become. And you think you are insulting us by calling us mediocre? You are only confirming to us that you are Westerners.

rp

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 637
    • View Profile
Re: Homo Hubris
« Reply #6 on: March 17, 2021, 11:41:23 pm »
"Reminder: one day we must cover Buckingham Palace in the 'Western civilization is UGLY' topic."
I already have:
Next stop: Buckingham "Palace" (360 degree tour courtesy of BBC):
https://youtu.be/FtGN2wK9g_s

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2852
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Homo Hubris
« Reply #7 on: March 24, 2021, 12:25:03 am »
OLD CONTENT

Recently you may have heard of this incident:

www.thedailybeast.com/columbia-student-from-viral-video-speaks-i-am-not-racist

A columbia university student just went on a drunken racist tirade shouting how whites built modern civilization. Of course, WN groups are claiming that this is not racist because he is merely "stating the facts". Any thoughts?

---

Quote
According to von Abele, his videotaped tirade was simply a plea for all races and cultures to openly appreciate their people’s accomplishments. “I believe that every single person should love themselves and love their culture, and we should all be allowed to be proud of our heritage,” he said.

There exist racist cultures. Therefore, if every single person should love their culture, there will exist some people who love racism.

There exist racist heritages. Therefore, if every single person should be allowed to be proud of their heritage, there will exist some people allowed to be proud of racism.

As for whether von Abele individually is racist, the answer can be found by considering: is the particular culture/heritage which he loves racist?

Quote
"**** yeah, white people. **** yeah, white men."

If it were not, it would never even have come up with the notion of "whiteness".

Therefore von Abele is racist. QED

Quote
"Look, I don’t hate other people, I just love white men."

I hate von Abele and all like him, and I would be ashamed of myself if I did not.

Quote
"I was theatrically and sarcastically demonstrating that whites are not allowed to embrace their cultural achievements"

Why should they be? Should Jews be allowed to embrace Jewish cultural achievements? Should people who experiment on animals be allowed to embrace their research achievements?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vivisection#François_Magendie_(1783–1855)

Quote
Magendie was a physiologist at the Académie Royale de Médecine in France, established in the first half of the 19th century.[15] Magendie made several groundbreaking medical discoveries, but was far more aggressive than some of his other contemporaries with his use of animal experimentation. For example, the discovery of the different functionalities of dorsal and ventral spinal nerve roots was achieved by both Magendie, as well as a Scottish anatomist named Charles Bell. Bell used an unconscious rabbit because of "the protracted cruelty of the dissection", which caused him to miss that the dorsal roots were also responsible for sensory information. Magendie, on the other hand, used conscious, six-week-old puppies for his own experiments.[15][16] While Magendie's approach was more of an infringement on what we would today call animal rights, both Bell and Magendie used the same justification for vivisection: the cost of animal lives and experimentation was well worth it for the benefit of humanity.[16]

Many viewed Magendie's work as cruel and unnecessarily torturous. One note is that Magendie carried out many of his experiments before the advent of anesthesia, but even after ether's discovery it was not used in any of his experiments or classes.[15] Even during the period before anesthesia, other physiologists expressed their disgust with how he conducted his work. One such visiting American physiologist describes the animals as "victims" and the apparent sadism that Magendie displayed when teaching his classes.

Speaking of which, who introduced experimentation on animals as a method of research in the first place?

Quote
"**** yeah, white people. **** yeah, white men."

Correct:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_animal_testing

Quote
The history of animal testing goes back to the writings of the Ancient Greeks in the 4th and 3rd centuries BCE, with Aristotle (384–322 BCE) and Erasistratus (304–258 BCE) one of the first documented to perform experiments on animals.[1]
...
In his unfinished 1627 utopian novel, New Atlantis, scientist and philosopher Francis Bacon proposed a research center containing "parks and enclosures of all sorts of beasts and birds which we use ... for dissections and trials; that thereby we may take light what may be wrought upon the body of man."
...
the dramatic "Experiment 41," which demonstrated the reliance of living creatures on the air for their survival. Boyle conducted numerous trials during which he placed a large variety of different animals, including birds, mice, eels, snails and flies, in the vessel of the pump and studied their reactions as the air was removed.[5] Here, he describes an injured lark:
…the Bird for a while appear'd lively enough; but upon a greater Exsuction of the Air, she began manifestly to droop and appear sick, and very soon after was taken with as violent and irregular Convulsions, as are wont to be observ'd in Poultry, when their heads are wrung off: For the Bird threw her self over and over two or three times, and dyed with her Breast upward, her Head downwards, and her Neck awry.[6]

(I strongly encourage reading the whole page.)

The Western idea of utopia implies unlimited experimentation on non-humans.

Quote
“We invented science and industry and you want to tell us to stop because, ‘Oh my God, we’re so bad!’”

Yes, you did. Yes, I do. Yes, you are.

Quote
"**** yeah, white people. **** yeah, white men."

WE WILL REPLACE YOU.

---

Another one:

metro.co.uk/2019/01/12/racist-says-white-men-created-civilisation-brixton-mcdonalds-8337918/

Quote
A man told customers that ‘white men created civilisation’ and ‘England is f***ed because it’s run by women and immigrants’ during a racist rant at McDonald’s.

The middle-aged man can be heard in the clip telling staff at the fast food chain on Brixton Road in London: ‘This place is run by bloody immigrants’.

After noticing a man filming his monologue, he tells the crowd waiting for their orders: ‘You feminist, weak, hairy-faced, “mangina”, soy boys… cut your balls off… you’re letting women run the world, shame upon you all.
...
The unnamed man refers to Mr Parvenu, who calls himself a ‘black bohemian’ on Twitter, as ‘bruv’ in the video and tells him: ‘The world is built by white men. You don’t like it, do you?’. The man goes on: ‘The entire civilisation was created by white men, white men created the world for you people.’

It's disturbing to think how WN never really took off in popularity until it incorporated misogyny into its ideology. And there used to be some desperate thinkers who thought promoting misogyny could end racism by leading to unification among men. I warned them that promoting misogyny would just make racism many times worse than it already was. They went ahead and did it anyway. Guess who was correct.....

The above is your creation, imbeciles, and now you have lost control over what you created.

---

It seems like every other day I read about random people being outed as closet WNs.

atlantablackstar.com/2018/07/28/bronx-doctor-gets-found-out-as-closet-white-nationalist-claims-hes-now-seeking-professional-help/

Although, funnily enough, the WN in question is Jewish!

---

"Although, funnily enough, the WN in question is Jewish!"

No surprises, as usual.

Quote
a resident radiologist at Montefiore Medical Center’s Moses Campus in the Bronx.

A radiologist. Think about that for a moment. How many "non-whites" might he have given cancer to over the years by deliberately scanning them slightly longer?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CT_scan#Adverse_effects

Quote
“The West has no use for [Muslims], and they’ll be just fine when they go home,” he wrote.

Let us thank him for demonstrating Western thinking: only people with exploitative value to the West have reason be allowed to live in Western countries. And even then, Western countries are not their home, even if they are born there.

Quote
“If we take the birth of a non-white in isolation from context, that birth isn’t inherently a tragedy to the white race … [my] point is the principle that the loss of a white child is far worse than the birth of a non-white, at least in theory,” Bechhofer wrote in another.

This is accurate analysis. If the "non-white" birth rate had been lower 600 years ago, world history would not have been too different. If the "white" birth rate had been lower 600 years ago, the colonial era might never have happened. Of course, what is worse in Bechhofer's eyes is better in our eyes.

Quote
In another post attributed to “Dov,” the doctor wrote, ” … Do I despise Blacks like [Colin] Kaepernick for milking the White cow despite the fact that he, his race, and all others are already in such objective debt to Whites? Absolutely.”

There is nothing objective about it. Only rightist "non-whites" feel indebted to "whites". Leftist "non-whites" do not. Kaepernick clearly belongs in the latter category:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/news/sports-as-a-platform-for-protest/

---

Tucker Carlson’s racist remarks:
www.motherjones.com/media/2019/03/tucker-carlson-calls-iraqis-semiliterate-primitive-monkeys-in-latest-round-of-tapes/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7TjXAwAAjTY

This commenter gets it:

Quote
Yes white people are responsible for the industrial revolution and the impending collapse of the biosphere as a result of the industrial revolution.

---

We should invite people like that over here.

---

“semiliterate primitive monkey.”

To be clear, if you are offended by being called a monkey, you have already been Westernized. The truth (which is so obvious that it shouldn't even need to be stated) is that monkeys have done almost infinitely less evil in the world than humans.

“culture where people just don’t use toilet paper or forks.”

web.archive.org/web/20120219201640/http://blogs.nationalgeographic.com/blogs/thegreenguide/2010/04/27000-trees-a-day-used-for-toilet-tissue.html

“extremely primitive.”

Biologically, women are on average more neotenous than men. If Carlson is using "primitive" to mean underdeveloped, he would be correct. But if "primitive" means less evolved, then it would be men (who failed to become as neotenous as women on average) who are more "primitive". One thing is for sure:

www.essence.com/news/politics/if-only-women-voted/

Which is, of course, not to say that men in general are the problem:

brilliantmaps.com/if-only-x-voted/

See also:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/issues/demographic-blueshift/


90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2852
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Homo Hubris
« Reply #8 on: March 24, 2021, 12:40:58 am »
OLD CONTENT contd.

Research confirms what I intuitively predicted a decade ago about how backlash politics works:

www.nytimes.com/2019/04/30/world/asia/sri-lanka-populism-ethnic-tensions.html

Quote
‘Overrun,’ ‘Outbred,’ ‘Replaced’: Why Ethnic Majorities Lash Out Over False Fears
...
That dynamic, sometimes known as a majority with a minority complex, is thought to be a major factor in the rise of right-wing populism in Europe, religious nationalism in Asia, and white nationalist terrorism in the United States and New Zealand.
...
These dynamics are rising globally, and not only when one group is a majority nationally and a minority regionally.

Asked in 2013 about Buddhist violence against Myanmar’s Rohingya Muslim minority that would later culminate in genocide, Aung San Suu Kyi, the country’s de facto leader, responded by warning darkly of “global Muslim power.”
...
And the rise of democracy, long considered a force for ethnic harmony, may be provoking majority backlashes instead, according to research by Jack Snyder, a Columbia University political scientist.

As democracy became the global norm, dominant ethnic groups found themselves under growing pressure to share power with minorities. They even lost the occasional election.

Anxiety around losing status can manifest as fears, however unfounded, of becoming outnumbered. In countries with weak institutions, that can lead to violence, possibly contributing to the stall in democracy’s once-rapid spread.

“We often see this phenomenon at moments of increasing democratization and increasing enfranchisement,” said Kate Cronin-Furman, a University College London political scientist, citing “horrible violence against the Rohingya breaking out at a time of increased democratization in Burma.”
...
Muslims, we hear at rallies for the Alternative for Germany and France’s National Front, will soon outnumber non-Muslims in Europe and impose Shariah law.

A leader of Vox, the Spanish far-right party that just won its first Parliamentary seats, warned at a September rally of an “Islamist invasion.” The party supports policies to increase Spanish birthrates.

Many whites welcome pluralism and multiculturalism. But for those who see the decline of white dominance as destabilizing, any increase in the minority population is perceived as an attack.

A growing body of research suggests that this sentiment may be driving significant political change in the United States, which is projected to become “majority minority” — with whites less than half of the population — by 2050.

A study by Maureen Craig of New York University and Jennifer Richeson of Yale University found that white Americans who so much as read a news article on these demographic changes will express “more negative attitudes toward Latinos, blacks, and Asian-Americans” and “more automatic pro-white/anti-minority bias.”

The effect disappeared when the authors told participants that whites were expected to remain politically and culturally dominant
.

And yet many of them do not like to be called "white supremacists" even though this is precisely what they are.

(By the way, "white American" is an oxymoron.)

Quote
Other studies find that when white Americans learn about these demographic trends they become less supportive of immigration, affirmative action, welfare spending and health care spending, and more supportive of military spending and of President Trump.

In a 2016 poll, 57 percent of whites said “discrimination against whites is as big a problem today as discrimination against blacks and other minorities.”

Fears of ‘Replacement’

Whites are subject to the same forces as any other demographic group. Fears of being outnumbered can lead to violence.

A rising wave of white-nationalist terrorists repeatedly cite “replacement theory,” in which Jews are said to be orchestrating mass immigration in order to destroy the white race.

At the 2017 “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, white power activists chanted “Jews will not replace us” during their torchlit march on the University of Virginia campus.

Brenton Tarrant, who murdered 50 people in two Christchurch, New Zealand, mosques, described immigration and low white birthrates as “an assault on the European people that, if not combated, will ultimately result in the complete racial and cultural replacement of the European people.”

Jews indeed will not replace you: they - the ones who deliberately set up your backlash - obviously want it to succeed in creating additional ethnostates in the near future (whereupon Israel will acquire a much politically safer position by ceasing to be the only ethnostate in the world).

We, who defy the Zionist agenda to make ethnostates the norm in the 21st century, are the ones who will replace you.

www.wewillreplaceyou.com/

www.facebook.com/WeWillReplaceU/

www.instagram.com/wewillreplaceyou/

www.commondreams.org/organization/we-will-replace-you

newpol.org/we-will-replace-you/

www.houstonchronicle.com/local/gray-matters/article/Yes-we-will-replace-you-11942497.php

whatwouldjackdo.org/2017/09/16/you-will-not-replace-us-ah-but-we-can-and-will-replace-you/

www.teepublic.com/t-shirt/1848861-we-will-replace-you

---

This is very clear in the colonial context. People defended that Middle Easterners were uncivilized barbarians, but at the same time not only seemed to admire their way of life seemingly free of Western formality, a more honest and noble way of life, but also actively projected Western fantasies and obsessions on them. That's how the Middle East (the "Orient," as they called it) became a place of unrestrained debauchery and violence. It became the imaginary place where the West could finally live out and fulfil its deepest, most repressed fantasies. The sad thing is that this had very real consequences for the real people living in such places. But that's okay for the West, because at the end of the day they're not really people.

---

www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/couples-kissing-photo-with-dead-lion-goes-viral/ar-AAEteJh

A photo of Western civilization:



---

Feed them to the lions.

---

More Western thinking revealed:

www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2019/07/22/the-stars-at-stake-how-the-fight-for-equality-could-mean-the-death-of-humanity/

Quote
We need to get off the planet and establish permanent, self-sustaining bases elsewhere in the solar system and even the galaxy.
...
The money spent pursuing the unachievable goal of equality should have gone on the eminently achievable goal of permanent bases in outer space. ... And we could have been there by now, if we weren’t spending so much in the vain pursuit of equality. Indeed, right now we’re spending huge sums to increase the drag on progress and postpone the conquest of space.
...
While South African Blacks were killing albinos for their magically potent body-parts, South African Whites were building nuclear weapons.

Our enemies are now literally declaring that "whites" are superior because they build nukes..... You cannot make this **** up.

Seriously, if you were given a choice between either a world with no albino-killing or a world with no nukes, which would you choose? Albino-killing is just ordinary homicide that we can leave the police to deal with. In contrast, were the bombers of Hiroshima and Nagasaki (or, for that matter, those who left behind all the depleted uranium from manufacturing nukes) ever arrested, put on trial and punished? And albino-killing can end as soon as no one wants to kill albinos any more. In contrast, nuclear disarmament cannot occur even when all nuclear-armed states want to disarm, because no one is willing to be the first to disarm. So which is worse?

And one more thing. "Black" South Africans are not proud of the freaks among them who kill albinos. Yet "white" South Africans are proud of the freaks among them who build nukes. Which group is the real problem here?

Quote
I’ve never seen a feminist or an anti-racist write about the threat of an asteroid strike or another kind of mega-catastrophe. Why not?
...
Indeed, if it had been up to women and non-Whites, we wouldn’t even know about those threats and the repeated catastrophes that have visited the Earth. Modern science is a White male invention and White men have been the most successful and active explorers of our vast and ancient universe.
...
On their own, women and non-Whites would never have discovered the “iridium anomaly” that helped explain the extinction of the dinosaurs. But then women and non-Whites would never have discovered iridium or dinosaurs either. We owe our knowledge of that element and those animals to White men.
...
one species of mammal learnt about dinosaurs and the asteroid that had wiped them out.
...
Or rather: one sex of one race of that mammalian species learnt about those things. The species was Homo sapiens, the race was Whites, and the sex was male.

Why must we discover iridium or dinosaurs? Were earlier people who had never heard of iridium somehow deficient compared to later people? Does knowing about dinosaurs make one a better person compared to not knowing about dinosaurs? And even if so, then how much more that we currently don't know about must we also discover before we are considered "good enough" (whatever that means)?

Quote
the White race is travelling somewhere. We have a destination. And I fear that, like Lee Pomeroy, we will never get there, thanks to non-White dysfunction.

No, Homo Hubris, you do not have a destination. No quantity of discovery will ever satisfy you. You will simply move on to discovering the next thing, on and on without end. It is only those who realize the endlessness, and hence the fundamental valuelessness, of accumulationism who can speak of having a destination.

---

https://www.newsweek.com/nixon-reagan-racism-african-united-nations-1971-1451869

Quote
"To see those… monkeys from those African countries—damn them, they're still uncomfortable wearing shoes!"

They are correct to be uncomfortable wearing shoes!

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barefoot#Health_implications

Quote
Feet that have never worn shoes rarely exhibit problems such as bunions, corns, and "fallen arches",[109][110] are not prone to more than ordinary foot eversion on standing and walking due to the associated weakness or stiffness of the joints of the foot and weakness of the muscles controlling them,[111] as well as having a much reduced incidence of problems such as callouses.[112]

Walking barefoot results in a more natural gait. People who are used to walking barefoot tend to land less forcefully, eliminating the hard heel strike and generating much less collision force in the foot and lower leg.[113] A 2006 study found that shoes may increase stress on the knee and ankle, and suggested that adults who walked barefoot may have a lower rate of osteoarthritis,[114] although more study is required to elucidate the factors that distribute loads in shod and barefoot walking. A 2007 study examined 180 modern humans and compared their feet with 2,000-year-old skeletons. They concluded that, before the invention of shoes, humans overall had healthier feet.[113] A 1991 study found that children who wore shoes were three times more likely to have flat feet than those who did not, and suggested that wearing shoes in early childhood can be detrimental to the longitudinal arch of the foot.[109] Children who habitually go barefoot were found to have stronger feet, with better flexibility and mobility, fewer deformities like flat feet or toes that curve inwards, and fewer complaints.[115]

---

It gets worse:

www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/liverpool-lord-mayor-stripped-title-16669078

Quote
Liverpool Lord Mayor and patron of anti-racism charity stripped of title after sharing racist video
...
the video made comparisons between a black person and a monkey.

Cllr Brennan is a patron of the Anthony Walker Foundation - the charity set up to promote racial harmony in the memory of the shocking racist murder of black teenager Anthony Walker in Huyton.

Anthony was killed by Michael Barton on this exact day in 2005.
...
“This appalling video was circulated 14 years to the day since the promising and talented Merseyside teenager Anthony Walker was brutally murdered in a horrific racist attack.

---

How Westerners pose for photos:

https://www.newsweek.com/jimmy-johns-trends-after-old-photo-owner-elephant-he-killed-goes-viral-again-1455872




90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2852
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Homo Hubris
« Reply #9 on: March 24, 2021, 01:05:09 am »
OLD CONTENT contd.

This one needs a smackdown:

www.amren.com/news/2019/08/the-woody-allen-fallacy/

Quote
Both whites and non-whites complain about each other, but only one side is making sense. Observe:

Proximity to non-whites makes whites suffer. Therefore, whites denigrate non-whites because they want less of them.
Proximity to whites makes non-whites prosper. Therefore, non-whites denigrate whites because they want more of them.

Which perspective is more honest and reasonable?

Why do bandits run away after raiding? Because proximity to the victims makes the bandits suffer (by getting punished).

Why do victims of the raid chase after the bandits after being raided? Because proximity to the bandits makes the victims prosper (by recovering the stolen property and exterminating the bandits).

Does the above make the bandits "more honest and reasonable" than the victims?

Also this does not imply that we want more bandits. We would rather no raid ever occurred in the first place. But that does not mean that, given the reality that the raid did occur, we are willing to let the bandits get away with it unpunished.

Quote
An honest and reasonable approach would be for non-whites to praise whites for creating great civilizations, and also to state explicitly that non-whites have it better among whites than among their own kind.

Would it make sense for the victims to praise the bandits for creating great raids? Should the fact that the victims can recover their stolen property only from the bandits and not from other victims (duh!) be spun into an interpretation that victims "have it better" among bandits than among other victims?

Quote
If they were honest, they would show more respect for their generous white hosts and for the Truth.

Do bandits deserve respect? Can bandits to claim to be "generous" with property that they stole? (And is the mysteriously capitalized "Truth" the same one used by Trump?)

Quote
But these people don’t show respect. They act like invaders, and they never fail to give in to anti-white bigotry in their politics. And when whites quite naturally resist this, they redouble their efforts against the whites, the very people who’ve been their benefactors all along – all because they want more out of white people, not less.

Is storming the bandit hideout to demand return of stolen property "invasive"? Is it "anti-bandit bigotry" to demand the bandits be punished?

I agree that it is natural for bandits to resist returning stolen property and to resist being punished. It is also to the victims' credit that they redouble their efforts to bring the bandits to justice. And yes, the victims should want as much justice as possible.

Quote
What is a white supremacist? In the eyes of non-whites, a white supremacist is a white person who wants to get away from non-whites: to effectively give them smaller portions, or none at all.

Yes. A bandit who belives that bandits owe their victims nothing, and hence wants to get away from the pursuing victims to prevent them from recovering their stolen property - in other words that initiated violence is respectable but retaliatory violence is not - can accurately be called a bandit supremacist.]

Quote
This is why they demonize and promise to wage war against the very people who’ve been their benefactors for decades. It all boils down to the Woody Allen Fallacy: The very thing they profess to hate is what they desperately want more of.

We do not want more bandits to exist. What we want is to leave no existing bandit unpunished.

Quote
Non-whites need to be called out for this. They also need to understand that they have no right to complain about white people, because white people don’t owe them a portion of anything.

Compare the two parts in bold.

Quote
Non-whites don’t come to America or Europe because they are doing such a bang-up job running their own countries, after all.

I was unable to find where the author explains why "whites" came to America. Or everywhere else around the world they ever colonized, for that matter.

---

Our enemies again set themselves up for us to laugh at them:

www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2019/09/13/the-esthetic-prop-revisited/

Quote
In Wilmot Robertson’s watershed book The Dispossessed Majority (1972), in the chapter titled “The Esthetic Prop,”[1] he describes the Esthetic Prop, which he associates most closely with the “Nordic physical ideal,” as a “genetic resource” and “an enduring, deeply-ingrained esthetic preference on the part of most Americans.”[2] It is also a source of White (i.e., European) racial feeling and allegiance and one of the few remaining props supporting the White position:

It is the…Esthetic Prop which helps the American White Majority to hold on to the trappings, but not the substance, of its former power. Only in the sector of esthetics, through the pervasiveness of the idealized Nordic [i.e., Northern European] biological type and its continued acceptance as the national template of physical charm and attractiveness, has the Majority been able to mount a small but successful holding action in the present racial melee.[3]
...
Robertson’s words point us toward a still active beacon of light which has been given too little consideration. We should give new heed to what his words clearly suggest: that the Esthetic Prop is a latent source of power that could and should be activated to help our cause.
...
Its proper appropriation, which we should use to full advantage, would be to prop up the race to which it belongs, to help inspire and motivate the upward trajectory of a White resurgence, by helping us clearly see what this time we really are fighting for.

OK? And then here come their examples:

Quote





But wait, they have celebrity examples too!

Quote









That profile view in the second picture is almost cartoonishly subhuman.

It's not over yet:

Quote
There is certainly a great degree of personal preference on this subject, especially in terms of particular ranking, but there should be general agreement (outliers always excepted) as to qualification. Some such safe examples I could cite would be Audrey Hepburn in Roman Holiday (1953), Vivien Leigh in Caesar and Cleopatra (1945), Elizabeth Allan in A Tale of Two Cities (1935), Greta Garbo in Queen Christina (1933),[7] and Grace Kelly in any of the films of her brief career.

I'm even going to do the work for them. Hepburn in Roman Holiday:



Leigh in Caesar and Cleopatra:



Allan in A Tale of Two Cities is the cartoonishly subhuman profile view covered above. Here is a front view:



Garbo in Queen Christina:



Kelly:





Remember: these are the best our enemies could find. In other word, when they think of the ultimate in "white" beauty, this is what is in their minds.



Quote
To counter the power of White beauty they have long labored to deconstruct and relativize it, and even to debase and debauch it

No, all I have to do is repost the exact same pictures that you yourself posted, and exhibit the same examples that you yourself chose. And laugh about it.

Quote
Garbo was a personal favorite of Robertson. He had a large picture book of her in his library which caught my eye. When I pulled it off the shelf and started looking through it he became quite animated and enthused about what she meant to his generation (he was eighteen when Queen Christina was released) for whom she personified the ultimate esthetic ideal.

Fine, let's do another Garbo:



One thing I will say: her face goes perfectly with the Western chair. (This is not a compliment, of course.)

And then from the comments:

Quote
the beauty of our women creates jealousy and provides even more motivation to destroy our gene pool.

Quote
The urge to decry, belittle and destroy beauty, be it white women, or the incomparable best of white civilisation and art, is of course founded upon the Nietzschean concept of ressentiment, or more simply sour grapes.

And this is why we aptly call them Homo Hubris. Hubris is not just when they have a ridiculously high opinion of themselves, but when they are convinced that everyone else does as well, and interpret all criticism as motivated by jealousy. Meanwhile back in reality, we are honestly bewildered as to how it is even possible to call the above examples "beauty". Or, more to the point, how racially inferior our enemies must in order to indeed perceive beauty in the above examples.

Homework: graphically visualize our enemies jacking off to the above pictures.

---

Also from the comments:

Quote
I nominate Elizabeth Taylor, Penelope Cruz, and Sophia Loren as famous exemplars of European beauty

Taylor:



Cruz:



Loren:





Quote
Monica Vitti wasn’t bad either

Vitti:



Quote
Sissy Spacek-type women work fine for me

Spacek:



This is turning into a Cro-Magnon skull yard sale! Does anyone still think (in this case Giant) blood memory is not real?
« Last Edit: May 09, 2021, 01:02:35 am by 90sRetroFan »

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2852
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Homo Hubris
« Reply #10 on: March 24, 2021, 01:24:24 am »
OLD CONTENT contd.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/boys-from-elite-toorak-college-filmed-chanting-sexist-song-20191021-p532uj.html

---

Richard Spencer praises "slaveowning badassery" of Robert E Lee, says it was "high culture" (LOL)

---

Forced sterilization when?

---

www.amren.com/features/2019/11/on-faith-and-purpose/

Quote
What is whiteness? Think of the protests when Apollo 11 launched. Black leaders said we shouldn’t be going to the moon while there was still poverty in America.
...
If they want to call that “whiteness,” let them. That’s what I’m fighting for. It’s something greater than just the existence of our people. It’s for the very possibility of human progress, meaning, and upward development. Without us, there’s just this dead rock.
...
In any event, if they are “people of color,” what are we? Someone jokingly suggested on Twitter we should be called “people of light.” It didn’t catch on, but it appealed to me.

I do think of our people as the torchbearers of the human spirit, the Faustian civilization, people who carry something essential that nobody else does. We carry light into the darkness, even into outer space. “People of light” seems appropriate.
...
We must have utter faith that we will survive, that we will be stronger. And when we emerge from the darkness, the achievements, glories, and victories of our past will be nothing compared to what we are going to do in the future.

Yes, we know:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/if-western-civilization-does-not-die-soon/

That's the reason why we cannot allow you to survive. As your own last sentence reflects, your civilization is fundamentally insatiable. This insatiability is what you carry that no other civilization does. "People of hubris" is the accurate term for you.

---

Western hubris endangers everyone:

www.eurocanadian.ca/2019/11/beyond-environmentalism.html

Quote
Whites have produced virtually all of the world’s creative geniuses; this has made Western civilization the wealthiest and most powerful that has ever existed.
...
the best environmental policy is to encourage more industrial economic activity, i.e. more factories, more smokestacks, more burning of fossil fuels and more R & D, but only in white racially homogeneous societies.
...
Environmentalists are too pessimistic; the large number of geniuses that have shaped the course of Western civilization since the time of Plato and Aristotle are the white man’s greatest resource. Average men see limited resources, but to a genius, the list of potential resources is infinite; for all we know, man’s next most vital resource may be all around us, like water or air. All that is lacking are the men with the IQ and creativity to discover novel industrial uses for them. The scientific method ensures that man is not the prisoner of his own biology or even the laws of thermodynamics. As Western man’s knowledge increases, his limitations quietly recede into the background.
...
Conserving and increasing the white man’s stock of natural resources for future generations will not be achieved under some neoliberal system of world governance, where national interests are subordinated to economic ones, but by cultivating the white man’s most important resource, his ability to create the world’s great geniuses. This can only be done by implementing a pro-natalist policy that encourages high quality whites to have as many children as possible.

The irony is that this attitude is what got us into the current environmental disaster in the first place. If the Renaissance and consequently the Industrial Revolution had never happened, there would today not even be an environmental problem requiring a solution. And yet they claim the solution is more of the same thing that created the problem.....

---

www.amren.com/commentary/2020/01/roger-scruton-rip/

Quote
Defending beauty means defending Western culture’s achievements. Because Western Civilization is white civilization, attacking beauty means attacking whites and deconstructing our history, culture, and aesthetics. This is why so many people celebrated when Notre Dame burned. It’s also why journalists repeatedly linked Sir Roger to the Alt-Right simply because he defended beautiful buildings.

Can anyone imagine any other civilization saying the same thing about itself (claiming a monopoly on beauty)?

By no coincidence, the only one saying it is actually the ugliest one:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-is-ugly-48/

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2852
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Homo Hubris
« Reply #11 on: March 24, 2021, 01:42:42 am »
OLD CONTENT contd.

"discoveries in the field of formal sciences such as mathematics, where arithmetic, linguistics, and algebra predate the West by many years and originated in non Western cultures."

While this may be true, we should nevertheless not encourage a "Who Discovered Most Stuff" contest in any form. The very premise of quantity of discoveries as a measure of civilizational superiority is itself a Western idea:

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/truth-knowledge/

Discoveries in formal sciences, while on the whole less practically dangerous than discoveries in empirical sciences, must ultimately be judged by the equivalent principle as we judge discoveries in empirical science: they are only positive if they can be applied to simplify thought to a greater degree than their existence itself might complexify it. For example, where we are already required to handle a certain type of calculation, a mathematical theorem that generalizes a relationship between elements such that all calculations of that type can be more conveniently solved using that theorem (we can think of this as "formal automation"), then discovering that theorem can be considered positive provided the above is its only effect. On the other hand, a theorem which makes possible a new type of calculation that previously did not exist (we can think of this as "formal machinery") is likely to be better off left undiscovered.

I do not consider it a coincidence that, whereas formal automation comprised most mathematical discoveries in ancient times, a sudden explosion in formal machinery occurred during the Renaissance:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_number#History

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_calculus#Early_Modern

Nor do I consider it a coincidence how terrifyingly formal machinery empowers material machinery:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_analysis

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calculus#Applications

---

www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/11/uk-more-nostalgic-for-empire-than-other-ex-colonial-powers

Quote
A third of people in the UK believe Britain’s colonies were better off for being part of an empire, a higher proportion than in any of the other major colonial powers, a global survey has revealed.
...
Conservative voters were almost twice as likely as Labour voters to yearn for Britain to still have an empire, while Brexit-supporting leave voters were more than twice as pro-empire than remainers.
...
Only the Netherlands appears to be more proud of its imperial history than the UK. Half of Dutch respondents said it was something to be more proud of than ashamed.

www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/11/european-colonial-powers-still-loth-to-admit-historical-evils

Quote
“The general feeling is still: we did it, it was a long time ago, everybody else was doing it, it’s not that serious, there’s nothing to apologise for,” said Sander Philipse, a historian and writer.
...
Piet Emmer, a retired history professor, has argued that present-day criticism of Dutch colonialism is absurd. “You’re not allowed to say, it but colonialism introduced modern civilisation,” he has said.

Of course you are allowed to say it. Modernity is what we are complaining about!

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-sustainable-evil/

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-is-a-health-hazard/

https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/if-western-civilization-does-not-die-soon/

---

Time for another round of laughing at our enemies' crappy aesthetical tastes! So I was reading this enemy article:

www.amren.com/features/2020/03/how-did-whites-get-their-appearance/

and you can guess what happened. Again, I must emphasize that all the examples below are examples chosen by our enemies themselves! In other words, it's not us deliberately picking subhuman faces to showcase, but our enemies picking what they consider to be beautiful:

Quote
I think Hedy Lamarr is the most beautiful Hollywood actress, ever.

Quote
Jewish I believe, but when she looks like that who gives a damn about her religion!



Quote
Paulina [Porizkova] was a legit dime in the 1980s



Quote
Gene Tierney.



Quote
Young Catherine Zeta Jones.



Quote
Come on, Naomi Watts...



Quote
And the winner is Uma Thurman.



Quote
I'd choose Jayne Mansfield any day.



Quote
Bridgett Bardot



« Last Edit: March 24, 2021, 11:39:51 pm by 90sRetroFan »

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2852
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Homo Hubris
« Reply #12 on: March 24, 2021, 01:56:03 am »
OLD CONTENT contd.

If you really want to understand how imbecilic Duchesne is, read this:

www.eurocanadian.ca/2019/01/transcendental-mind-europeans-stands-above-embedded-mind-asians.html

Quote
The advocates of cross-cultural dialogue, anthropologists generally, and the multicultural West, think that understanding other cultures entails adopting the other culture's perspective, putting oneself inside the shoes of the other inhabitants, by bracketing one's own particular perspective. Westerners, they insist, must let go of their own cultural presuppositions, their individualistic and rationalistic outlooks, if they are to grasp the perspective of the Other. The Western worldview is only one among many, and using this perspective is bound to obfuscate matters, result in the imposition of one's concepts upon the other.

What cultural relativists have failed to understand is that only the West developed appropriate philosophies, disciplines (ethnography, anthropology) and methodologies (pragmatism, historicism, hermeneutics) to understand other cultures and other historical epochs, because only the West produced a transcendental mind able to stand outside its own cultural norms, understand how it is bounded by a particular context. In this respect, insofar as the Western self learned to grasp the limitations of its thinking, it learned to stand above any limiting context, and thus demonstrate its unconditional character.

In other words, he himself instantly commits [in bold above] the very thing that the anthropologists explicitly warn him not to commit [in italics above], while thinking that by doing so he has discredited the anthropologists, when in reality it only proves the anthropologists all the more correct (in foreseeing that he cannot help but be tempted to do so)!

And the rest of his article is just repetition after repetition of his exact same mistake using different examples, while sincerely believing he is writing something insightful!

(He is also wrong to call all who disagree with him "cultural relativists". Cultural relativism is the claim that there is no way to determine superiority between different cultures. It is perfectly possible to believe that superiority between different cultures can be determined, without believing that superiority must be judged by Western standards!)

---

“More hubris from Duchesne (by the way, what kind of prick puts "Dr." in their Twitter name?)”

“Dr. David Duke”
“Dr. Henry Makow” (Ph. D)

---

Quote
Since white men invented all the disciplines and wrote all the greatest books

More accurately: since it was "white" men during the colonial era who got to decide what counts as a "discipline" and what does not, and what counts as a "great book" and what does not

Quote
must be discarded with "better" books by Mestizos.

And this "white" man Duchesne does not even have a grasp of grammar. (I think he means to say "discarded in favour of".)

---

He also excessively uses the word "bespeaks", perhaps to showcase his supposedly extensive vocabulary.

---

Duchesne outdoes himself:

Quote
The pursuit of truth is uniquely European, and that's why whites are the most honest in the world.

And I suppose that's why "whites" are the ethnic group most likely to support Trump. It must be because they see how truthful Trump is.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ire9vjnkdI

---

Duchesne is correct about Trump embodying "white masculinity" (the practical effects of which we get to see every day:

www.nytimes.com/2020/04/11/us/politics/coronavirus-trump-response.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=730-i0uIs8s

Now imagine if Trump ran the whole world. That's what Duchesne thinks is "rightful", apparently.

---

www.eurocanadian.ca/2020/04/kevin-macdonald-hail-catholic-5church-forcing-monogamy-upon-nobility.html

Quote
"it is expected that males with wealth and power" will employ their surpluses to "secure as many mates as possible". This is evolutionary biology 101.
...
White elite men were the only ones in history who did not follow this biologically prescribed tendency.
...
What stands out for MacDonald about the Catholic Church was its ability to regulate the sexual behavior of powerful White men in a monogamous direction away from the strong inclination of such men for polygamous relations. Essentially what the Church did was to instill strong religious norms (about mortal sin and punishment in Hell) in the mental processing of the higher brain centers of aristocratic men, damping down the instinctive appetite of the lower parts of the brain for multiple mates.

No it didn't, Duchesne! All it did was to encourage men to pump-and-dump their multiple mates, which enabled the rich/powerful men to go through even larger numbers of women than would have been possible if they were required to formally marry them all.

---

Duchesne exalts Western architecture, denigrates non-Western architecture such as pyramids as "pile of stones":

---

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skyscraper#Environmental_impact

Quote
Skyscrapers have considerable mass, which means that they must be built on a sturdier foundation than would be required for shorter, lighter buildings. Building materials must also be lifted to the top of a skyscraper during construction, requiring more energy than would be necessary at lower heights. Furthermore, a skyscraper consumes a lot of electricity because potable and non-potable water has to be pumped to the highest occupied floors, skyscrapers are usually designed to be mechanically ventilated, elevators are generally used instead of stairs, and natural lighting cannot be utilized in rooms far from the windows and the windowless spaces such as elevators, bathrooms and stairwells.

---

Duchesne achieves a new level of stupidity:

Quote
How was African history "erased" if Whites wrote almost 100% of the books on African history and invented ALL the fields for it: paleontology, archaeology, linguistics, anthropology?

THAT'S HOW!
Funny Funny x 1 View List

90sRetroFan

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2852
  • WESTERN CIVILIZATION MUST DIE!
    • View Profile
Re: Homo Hubris
« Reply #13 on: March 24, 2021, 01:59:31 am »
OLD CONTENT contd.

Pastor: Slavery's Legacy Is "White Blessing"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qIqKN09oc90

You just cannot make this **** up!

How stupid do you have to be to believe that any form of oppression is a "blessing"? What a fucken coward!

---

This kind of **** is what I hate the most about rightists. Any time something bad happens to a non-white person, they immediately try to divert attention from the matter at hand by saying “Oh yeah? Well what about (insert white person who got killed)? Nobody cared about that.” Which yeah, is true to an extent. Non-white people being killed is what gets the media the most attention, and is also what brings the nation closer to the collapse that (((they))) want. But where were you when any of these non-white people were being killed? I never saw you spreading your condolences and condemning the mistreatment. If they really believed in the whole “Love for your own race doesn’t mean hate for any other” excuse that they like to spread around to defend themselves, they would have at least been out there with the protesters making sure that people know that black lives do in fact matter before bringing any of these cases of white people being killed to light. But for 99% of these people, it’s either complete silence or they post edgy memes about the incident. So yeah, screw the whole “white lives matter” nonsense. It almost comes off as narcissistic how much they pull the “Oh yeah? Well what about these white people?” card. Now, if only that person bothered to carry a rocket launcher rather than simply take a picture for social media

---

www.counter-currents.com/2020/06/in-defense-of-racist-liberalism/

Quote
All men are created equal” sounds far more real when we’re talking about whites. And lest we forget, we know from the work of Ricardo Duchesne that we Europeans are descended from warrior-aristocrats who did battle on the Pontic-Caspian steppe for pure prestige. We are creatures of honor; in each European, there’s a king waiting to rise.

The problem of each European being a king, or at least a king-in-waiting, is that you can’t well, rule Europeans in an Asiatic manner.
...
How’s about this: Liberalism, but for whites, who are enshrined as metaphysically better and therefore worthy of the liberal society — something which is refreshingly well-grounded in the latest findings of neuroscience that whites, and in particular white men, have a certain je ne sais quoi that makes us more than just men, somehow closer to God than other races.
...
Racist liberalism, the idea that all white men are free and equal (but others aren’t) can strongly appeal to both the normie and the Dissident Rightist.

Exactly as I predicted:

aryanism.net/politics/foundations-of-the-true-left/western-civilization-must-die/

Quote
The essence of this tendency is best described as Western plebian hubris: a refusal to recognize the existence of a few enlightened individuals incomparably superior to everyone else in the same society and who therefore deserve absolute authority as rulers, judges and other arbitrators. ... This plebian hubris was by no means egalitarianism; on the contrary, it merely replaced the qualitative belief in the superiority of high-grade individuals worldwide over low-grade masses worldwide with an ethnocentric belief in the superiority of “white” over “non-white” regardless of grade, implying, for example, precedence of ”white” commoners over even “non-white” royalty, which provided the psychological priming for the uniquely Western phenomenon of colonialism.

guest5

  • Guest
The "Ancient Alien" theory basically boils down to "whites" telling non-"whites" that there's no way non-"white" ancient peoples could ever build the monuments, temples, and civilizations, that they did, because only modern "whites" and Western culture is capable of the technology to do so. Ancient Alien theory is the epitome of 'whitesplaining'.   

Our history books tell us the ancients were not technologically advanced. Hmmm.......
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4I0koj4uh0

‘Ancient Aliens’ Needs to Stop Erasing Non-White Cultural Excellence
Quote
You might think that History Channel’s Ancient Aliens is nothing more than a kooky guilty pleasure. After all, what’s the harm in letting a couple of camera-ready quacks share their completely unproven theories about aliens visiting ancient civilizations and gifting mankind with their superior knowledge? The problem is that the basic concept of Ancient Aliens is, well, rather racist. The implicit suggestion that ancient cultures, often non-white ones, would be incapable of advanced art, science, or architecture is problematic, to say the least. It’s a blindspot perpetuating the insidious idea that non-white, non-modern, and even non-Christian peoples were intrinsically dumb, when we have ample evidence to the contrary.

Yes, Ancient Aliens is not a guilty pleasure as much as its a troubling reminder of the disrespect we show non-white cultures.
https://decider.com/2020/06/16/ancient-aliens-racist-i-said-it/