True Left

the general principles underlying the structure of languages across the world, the rules which determine their grammar, are common, and that no fundamental difference exists between "civilized" and "primitive" languages.

Universal grammar - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

There are no linguistic universals: universal grammar is refuted by abundant variation at all levels of linguistic organization, which lies at the heart of human faculty of language.[23]

In addition, it has been suggested that people learn about probabilistic patterns of word distributions in their language, rather than hard and fast rules (see Distributional hypothesis).[24] For example, children overgeneralize the past tense marker "ed" and conjugate irregular verbs as if they were regular, producing forms like goed and eated and correct these deviancies over time.[25] It has also been proposed that the poverty of the stimulus problem can be largely avoided, if it is assumed that children employ similarity-based generalization strategies in language learning, generalizing about the usage of new words from similar words that they already know how to use.[26]

Language acquisition researcher Michael Ramscar has suggested that when children erroneously expect an ungrammatical form that then never occurs, the repeated failure of expectation serves as a form of implicit negative feedback that allows them to correct their errors over time such as how children correct grammar generalizations like goed to went through repetitive failure.[25][27] This implies that word learning is a probabilistic, error-driven process

article

article

X (formerly Twitter) · twitter.com

Whites conquered all the other lands as a result of attaining the highest level of consciousness. Among primitives and nonwestern civs, consciousness remained heavily tied to the depths of unconscious psychic life, and alien spirits, as it is among children or when dreaming.

Western civilization considers itself superior to non-Western civilizations in the same sense that adults consider themselves superior to children. And just as children have been mostly conditioned to agree that adults really are superior by accepting the adult standards of superiority, non-Western civilizations have similarly been mostly conditioned to agree that Western civilization is superior by accepting Western standards of superiority. Only we can see that the truth is the complete opposite.

It seems that the "white" identity partially sustains itself by arrogantly comparing itself to "non-whites". Although it mainly sustains itself by violently controlling "non-whites", and its able to continue to do this because only whites and eurocentric telegonized "non-whites" are able to hold positions of power in western civilization.

https://twitter.com/dr_duchesne/status/1655898177948483590

Blacks have always been child-like in their artistic abilities,

article

article

X (formerly Twitter) · twitter.com

Whites categorized all the living organisms on earth including over one million species of insects. They also originated ALL the sciences including Entomology =  study of insects and their relationship to human.

Insect collecting - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Historically, insect collecting has been widespread and was in the Victorian age a very popular educational hobby. Insect collecting has left traces in European cultural history, literature and songs (e.g., Georges Brassens's La chasse aux papillons (The Hunt for Butterflies)).
...
Capture and kill techniques

Further information: Insect trap

Insects may be passively caught using traps such as funnels, pitfall traps, bottle traps, malaise traps, or flight interception traps, some of which are baited with small bits of sweet foods (such as honey). Entomologists collecting nocturnal insects (especially moths) during faunistic survey studies might utilize ultraviolet light traps such as the Robinson trap. Aspirators, sometimes called "pooters", suck up insects too small or delicate to handle with fingers.[1]

Active capture of insects often involves using nets. Aerial insect nets are used to collect flying insects. The bag of a butterfly net is generally constructed from a lightweight mesh to minimize damage to delicate butterfly wings. Sweep nets are more rugged, and used to collect insects from grass and brush. A sweep net is swept back and forth through vegetation quickly turning the opening from side to side and following a shallow figure eight pattern. The collector walks forward while sweeping, and the net is moved through plants and grasses with force. Sweeping continues for some distance and then the net is flipped over, with the bag hanging over the rim, trapping the insects until they can be removed. Other types of nets used for collecting insects include beating nets and aquatic nets.[2] Leaf litter sieves are used by coleopterists and to collect larvae.

Once collected, a insects must be killed before they damage themselves trying to escape. Killing jars are used on hard-bodied insects. Soft-bodied insects, such as those in the larval stage, are generally fixed in a vial containing an ethanol and water solution.[3]

Insect Collections Methodology - Wikimedia Commons

commons.wikimedia.org

Category:Insect collecting devices - Wikimedia Commons

commons.wikimedia.org

Category:Insecta specimens - Wikimedia Commons

commons.wikimedia.org